User talk:Hcsrctu

jadoun or jadon

it is one of the 36 Royal races Rahul pal jadoun (talk) 04:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

jadoun

jadoun or yadu is the surname of rajput community jadou is a part of 36 Royal races Rahul pal jadoun (talk) 04:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Warning

Hello, I'm Rajanyas. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Graharipu have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.

Rajanyas (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

General sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ratnahastin (talk) 19:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Yadavs in Gujarat moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yadavs in Gujarat. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Yadavs in Haryana moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yadavs in Haryana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Abhira Brahmins moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abhira Brahmins. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Yaduvanshi Aheer. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 07:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

@Ekdalian: I made changes or added material to the article with a reliable sources, why did you remove it? And the word Aheer is not mentioned in any source in the article. If you can't improve the article then don't try to spoil it. You should focus on your kayasthas releted articles and not on other communities. Thank you. Hcsrctu (talk) 08:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Yaduvanshi Aheer, you may be blocked from editing. For further page move, you need to discuss on the article talk page! Ekdalian (talk) 10:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

@Ekdalian: You ignored my message, please read and understand it carefully. On one hand you remove the source of Bhragupati Singh But the source of the same author still exist what a doublespeak? Hcsrctu (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Let's discuss on the article talk page. Detailed review of the article is pending; all unreliable sources will be removed, don't worry. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)