User talk:HDRadioGuy2100

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of CaptainHog (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Block[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HDRadioGuy2100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not trying to cause any trouble here. I really have no idea who this "CaptainHog" guy is. You can't just assume that someone is a sockpuppet just because she/he edited a page. I even used some official licensing information straight from the FCC and from the HD Radio website. Are those not good enough? HDRadioGuy2100 (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per WP:DUCK, yes we can make that assumption.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But I specifically said that I wasn't that guy. I don't know who he is. I swear.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HDRadioGuy2100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not CaptainHog and WP:DUCK just doesn't seem like a good way to see if someone's a sockpuppet or not. I feel like I'm being bullied. HDRadioGuy2100 (talk) 00:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

After analyzing the evidence, I concur with blocking administrator's decision. Max Semenik (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.