User talk:Gyrferret

References

You provided the following references at Controversies regarding Jehovah's Witnesses: "<ref>United...worship book</ref><ref>''The Watchtower'', August 15, 1996 </ref>". Please provide more specific information for these references, especially the first one.

Noted. Sorry about that. In any case, I have removed the unhelpful reference.--Jeffro77 (talk) 21:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

iPod Touch

Regarding your revert of my change to iPod Touch, please help us come to a consensus on the issue in the related discussion "Product is not colloquially called iTouch" on Talk:IPod Touch. --Cybercobra (talk) 08:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Safari.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Safari.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:ITunes Wi-Fi Music Store.png)

You've uploaded File:ITunes Wi-Fi Music Store.png, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Good job

Good job with this, it looks quite good! Keep it up, VG Editor (talk) 13:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I congratulated you yesterday because you rewrote a few sections that needed rewriting. However splitting the Development section into multiple sub-sections like "Environment and Character Development" and "Public Announcements" is not warranted. Thus, I have removed the sub-sections you added. If you feel that the Development section is getting too lengthy, feel free to open up a discussion about splitting the Development section into its own article. But otherwise, the Development section isn't long enough to be split up into multiple sub-sections. Overview, history, promotion, release versions and Windows version are fine, but the rest weren't. VG Editor (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my terrible spelling on the blink 182 page. I was rushing while typing. (TheRobbEllisonShow (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC))

License tagging for File:Ruffianlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ruffianlogo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

VH1 Greatest Songs of the 80s

I agree, there are tons of articles on Wikipedia that should be deleted, but that is not my intention to go around randomly finding articles and proposing them for deletion. I propose articles that I feel don't need to be an article as I find them. You may have a different opinion since you are the creator of the article, but I won't "hit the Random Article button five times" and see what I get because, like I said, I propose them as I find them, I don't propose articles in a random fashion. Specifically relating to your article, it's non-notable. It has one source, which isn't reliable and the entire list in general is subjective based on one television network. Most of the other "Greatest" articles relating to the VH1 article have been deleted for the same reasons. Take a look here for an "Articles for Deletion" page on a previous VH1's Greatest page that was deleted to see what other had to say about it. If you feel this article shouldn't be deleted, feel free to challenge it and create a deletion discussion page for it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.--Rockin56 (talk) 06:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Grammar

Touche, Sir. :) --Cybercobra (talk) 06:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Cybercobra has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Replaceable fair use Image:IPod Touch 2.0.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:IPod Touch 2.0.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:25, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

File:IPod Touch 2.0.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:IPod Touch 2.0.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

File you uploaded listed for deletion

See here. Thanks. ÷seresin 10:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:App Store 2.2.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:App Store 2.2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ruffianlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ruffianlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)