User talk:GustavoCza/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Coldplay lead section

Hey there – just wanted to reach out in case you wanted to discuss any little edits at the Coldplay article aside from the nationality part (keeping that discussion at the talk page). I don't want you to feel like I'm trying to have a crack at you/talk down your edits; that being said, my ownership point still stands, as I just feel based on some of your edits/summaries ("jesus, calm down beyoncé" certainly wasn't warranted) that you like to control the content, at least to an extent. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being passionate about a particular topic; just remember that others can edit the article as well, and sometimes having a little cool-off and coming back to a piece of content with fresh eyes can be better than continuing to double down on something. Anyway, just thought it might be worth having a civil discussion in case there was anything you felt strongly about. A couple of things that I will clarify – given you asked – is that I've seen "number one" and "no. 1" used intermittently at different articles, and in my "less is more (sometimes)" approach I thought I'd shorten it, but that's not something I'm particularly strong on; similarly, I thought I'd see how the contents table looked when compact (you can't actually view it in the edit preview), but again, not particularly strong on that one, so happy to leave those things for the time being. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 15:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Well, I particularly have not seen "no. 1" being used in music-related articles. And I usually check for Taylor Swift, BTS, Beyoncé and other articles that I know are updated frequently and, as such, will likely be following current guidelines. The compact table is simply not practical for whoever access the page, each section have segments inside them after all. As for that second paragraph, it still needs work, I wanted to leave it alone while I was working on other stuff before coming back to it. Lastly, would you mind if we shorten the infobox picture's caption to "Coldplay at the Broadcasting House in 2021"? The current one looks good on Awards and Discography, but creates an unecessary additional line at Songs and Videography (which was why I first removed "the"). GustavoCza (talk) 17:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Sorry for the wait; I forgot to add your talk page to my watchlist and you might have also forgotten to ping me, so I didn't know you had responded, and I became busy with a few other things (I hadn't edited the page again until just now, as you can see) – I wasn't ignoring you. Those points that you made are fine, including shortening the infobox caption, but I still think that you're making some sentences too wordy when they don't need to be, so I've shortened some of them. For example, you can achieve the same thing with Each album had a unique theme and explored different genres as you can with Each [album] presented a specific theme and added new musical styles to the band's original repertoire, only the former is more concise (for the record, I think "each one" sounds too informal in this instance); does it need to be worded that way? 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 15:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Each "record" perhaps? I try to avoid repeating certain words too soon. Either way, I'm currently focused in some other Coldplay-related pages, I'll see this with attention later. Please rephrase the "X&Y (2005) and Viva la Vida or Death and All His Friends (2008) explored new musical territory..." part too, it doesn't paint the full picture. Despite incorporating some new electronic elements, X&Y was kind of a confort zone album, which led the band to get their first negative reviews. It was the criticism and trauma (they had a lot of internal fights and still hate the album to this day) that caused them to change their sound and reinvent it every time a new record is released. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 16:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Oh, and thank you for moving Will's quote away from the heading, that was an accident. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 16:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
I've reworded that part of the paragraph. For the record, if most/all of the ref names are single words, you actually don't need quotation marks for them, but I added them anyway; in said edit, why you did you remove the citation entirely instead? (Also, didn't want to go for a more original signature? :P) 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 16:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
I removed it entirely because I don't think it's necessary to source every single word, specially considering how Coldplay's live performances are almost always described that way in articles. (It's practical and visually pleasing :P) GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 17:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coldplay Reimagined EP Cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coldplay Reimagined EP Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Infinity Station Sessions EP Cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Infinity Station Sessions EP Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Biutyful cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Biutyful cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MOTS World Tour Poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MOTS World Tour Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Coldplay videography

Congratulations, GustavoCza! The list you nominated, Coldplay videography, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, GustavoCza. I'm just posting to let you know that Coldplay videography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

That's great news, I pretty much created the whole list, so having it shown to more people is nice! Thank you. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 11:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Coldplay album page possible update

Hey, I'm writing you because you were the most recent edit on the page for Coldplay's "Ghost Stories" album. I found something to possibly add but I'm not sure if it qualifies so I figured I'd reach out to a contributor who has more experience. Supposedly the band dedicated that album (and/or the song "Fix you") to a young man who died of Cancer in 2014. https://twitter.com/coldplayxtra/status/1093955920718118913?lang=en

I can't find my sources for this, so not sure if it merits adding. Thanks in advance! -T 69.242.228.250 (talk) 20:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I haven't found any sources either. We should keep this out until further notice unfortunetly. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 20:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Coldplay. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Unexplained reverts are disruptive--and in this case, what you stuck back in there is just redundant. "Since then...further...subsequently" all do the same thing: they point at the passage of time, but that's a given since this section of the lead follows chronology. Drmies (talk) 15:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

GustavoCza, it's a fact: unexplained reverts are disruptive. That's just a simple fact. Sure, you've done a lot here, but it was a GA a decade before you got to Wikipedia, and if I had to review this for GA right now I might not pass it. The verbosity, which others have pointed out too, is a big problem. Claims like "most successful" are part of that, and Y2kcrazyjoker4 was correct to point out how subjective that claim is. You're duking it out with three different editors now, and that's not a good thing either. 4TheWynne pointed at WP:OWN, and they've been here since 2014--consider listening to them. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Whatever, I give up, everyone thinks I'm dumb so it's no use. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 01:41, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Don't be silly. You are clearly not giving up, since you're still editing, so this is overdone and sophomoric. And no one thinks you're dumb. I don't understand why you're fighting over this "the writer" stuff, because that's silly and it's not good writing: you need to just accept that others are writers too, and this is a collaborative project. Now, this reverting/blanking on your user talk page, that's also not good. These pages are for collaborating, and blanking is the opposite of that. You want this article to be OK, or good, or better? Work with others--it's the only way. Use your skills, and let others use theirs--that's how we get good articles. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
It's not "the writer" stuff. That 4TheWynne user keeps editing the heading and whenever I try to adjust it or question what's written they act like I'm insane by using WP:OWN or that I'm dumb because English is not my first language. But then again, as I said, I give up on that page. Maybe you all should consider restoring it to the early 2020 version since it won't have any of my trash edits. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 03:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
No one said "trash edits", no one said "dumb", no one said "insane", and I don't know what edits by 4TheWynne you're talking about--a heading? But this is all way too full of drama for my taste: have it your way. Drmies (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Changes

What do you mean by replacing the 2021 set - Thanks 80.43.51.228 (talk) 18:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

They were going to perform on Jingle Bell Ball 2021, but the performance was cancelled because someone from the band's team got Covid (Chris later revealed it was him). That's why Coldplay performed in 2022, to make up for the previous year. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 19:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

You keep accusing people (not just me) of violating infobox guidelines and don't even bother to link us to these alleged rules, where are they? I would be more than happy to read them. I don't see how informing the amount of shows per continent Beyoncé will be doing is prejudicial. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 03:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

{{Infobox concert}} outlines everything. number_of_shows only asks for the total number of shows on the entire tour., not broken down per territory, especially when location exists to list the territories an artist is touring. livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

It outlines everything and yet you decided to accuse me of vandalism instead of being informative first. Consider being less rude next time. Thank you. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 04:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Avoid personal attacks such as the one you just made above, per Wikipedia's own guideline. And, to clarify, you were not accused of vandalism. You were accused of disruptively editing the page. Both are not the same thing. And you asked for clarification, and it was provided. Everything talk pages are about. :-) livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Coldplay at Orlando County Convention Center on December 3, 2022

Hi. I noticed that you removed my edit for the show at the Orlando County Convention Center on December 3, 2022, because you didn't think that setlist.fm is a reliable source. I agree with that, but the thing is, that show happened. So I am here to give a few more sources.


https://twitter.com/coldplayxtra/status/1599424568703127552?lang=en

https://twitter.com/meddlingmage/status/1599235958896926721

https://www.instagram.com/p/Clu_ElfuvEQ/

https://www.instagram.com/p/CluyBKfgM84/


This may not be enough, but the concert was a private concert and not much is known about it. Setlist.fm has the songs performed if / when that is needed. Cherrell410 (talk) 01:07, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Why does the countries table have England, Scotland and Wales on it when they're not independent countries?

Hi, I noticed that you reverted my edits on the Coldplay A Head Full of Dreams Tour, I changed the countries of England, Scotland and Wales to the United Kingdom, because they are nations that form the sovereign state known as the United Kingdom, they aren't independent countries. So with your permission I would like to revert back to the page I edited please? Thank you. 82.19.40.217 (talk) 13:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

England, Scotland and Wales are referred to as countries on Wikipedia and specifying them on the tour tables avoid confusion about the venue's address. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 13:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
I get that, but they're not independent countries, which is why I prefer to list them as United Kingdom as they all come together as one sovereign state, I mean it just doesn't make sense that all other sovereign states are correct on the page but I believe that it's not right that England, Scotland and Wales should be listed as they are because they are not independent, it's like saying instead of having United States on the page, let's have different states of America such as Utah, Nevada and Illinois, if United States is allowed to be one country on that page, I believe the same should be applied for the United Kingdom. 82.19.40.217 (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Well, the consensus is putting them separately instead of "United Kingdom", every tour page is the same on that matter. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 20:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Well that's probably because they have no idea that they're all in one sovereign state. 82.19.40.217 (talk) 23:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GustavoCza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 186.233.158.87. This is my college's wi-fi network and I use it regularly while I have free time in my work. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 11:43, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as, since you are not directly blocked, there is no block to unblock. Yes, I could theoretically lift the IP block ... but if, instead, you go to WP:IPECPROXY, follow the instructions there and request IP block exemption, you'd be more likely to succeed. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 11:43, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Live Broadcast from Buenos Aires Poster.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Live Broadcast from Buenos Aires Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you so much for keeping all of the Coldplay articles up to date, including the fact that you have expanded all of them, brought back the Parachutes tour, as well as spent a long time digging deep to find more performances and nominations. I really appreciate it!!! Cherrell410 (talk) 16:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
You're welcome! GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 00:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Talk pages

In the future, please start discussions on the Talk page when you disagree with other editors rather than edit-warring (you reverted 4 times today on Chris Martin). Schazjmd (talk) 16:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Yes sir. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Coldplay Tour Dates

It's amazing how fast you are to add them ! As soon as I see the news I update the French version (I'm French) and every time you've already modified the English version. Odyseus2 (talk) 08:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Coldplay usually tease their announcements beforehand, so I already had the editor ready to go when they published the new dates on Twitter hahahah. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 11:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Merging tables

Hello. I noticed you merging tables for Coldplay songs. Normally, I wouldn't protest this, but for instances such as "Yellow", "The Scientist", and "Clocks", it's best to keep these tables separated because of WP:USCHARTS. Because charts such as Alternative Airplay and Mainstream Rock Airplay aren't allowed to be included if the song appeared on the Hot Rock & Alternative Songs chart, people might misinterpret the guideline if they see all these charts in the same table. The HR&A chart didn't exist until 2009—long after the songs reached peak popularity—so it doesn't seem fair to exclude these charts because of an apparent technicality. Ping back if you have any questions. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 23:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

I personally think it's not worth keeping the tables all cluttered because of airplay charts. Multiple Coldplay songs are having a resurgence due to the Music of the Spheres World Tour, so I think the current times should be given consideration as much as the early years. Besides, the fact all of these tracks have made their way into Hot Rock & Alternative despite the ranking only being created years after is a testament to their longevity. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 23:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
I'm not saying merging tables is a bad thing, especially in this day and age. If it's to clear up clutter, by all means, go ahead, but if doing so creates a guideline paradox, we need to be careful. As long as the HR&A chart doesn't appear right next to its subordinates, I don't really care how spacious the year ranges are. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 00:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
I'm going to restore my version of the tables and include only the Hot Rock & Alternative Songs chart, which also counts sales and streaming instead of just airplay. Is that alright for you? GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 01:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
No, that's exactly what I'm trying to prevent. Why should we get rid of a bunch of charts just because a song happened to appear on a newer "master" chart 20-some years later for a brief period? It doesn't make sense to me, and it seems like we're ignoring history by doing that. Articles like "Running Up That Hill" seem to be doing just fine with two big tables—one from a historical perspective and one from a contemporary perspective. Tables that, if merged, would lead to one "historical" chart (Mainstream Rock) getting kicked out for no good reason and a bunch of legitimate 1985 peaks being completely ignored.
The point I'm trying to make is that chart tables should view a song's success from two angles if they experience a resurgence in popularity. IMO, "Yellow" and "Clocks" looks fine as they are—for now—but "The Scientist", "Fix You", and "Viva la Vida" could do with a merge or two for the "contemporary" tables, especially for consecutive years. As long as we don't exclude charts the songs originally appeared on in their heyday, because that just seems like ignorance. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 02:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
How about having it organized by decade then? Should at least reduce the cluttered visual. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 02:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
By decade I mean having one table covering all charts from 2000-2009, then 2010-2019 and 2020-2029. I don't mean to replace the decade-end tables in any way. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 02:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes, grouping weekly charts by decade sounds just fine, so long as "old" and "new" charts don't appear together int he same decade (e.g. in the case with HR&A, a table for 2009–2019 may be the better choice if the song charted before 2009). On another note, whether other users see this system as useful is another discussion entirely. This is something I can and will support, however. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 10:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Jonny Buckland

Just a heads up that I chose one to review. It doesn't notify co-nominators. dannymusiceditor oops 22:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Feel free to notify me as much as you need, I wrote most of the article. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 22:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Elon Musk

@GustavoCza: An edit like this one, especially from an established editor and on a highly-viewed article, is beyond unacceptable. Wretchskull (talk) 20:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm just mad Twitter is down. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 20:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Elon Musk, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello GustavoCza!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I'm very flattered for the invitation, but unfortunately I have to decline it. My college vacations were recently over so even the Coldplay articles, which are my main project, are being a struggle to maintain. Perhaps in a better moment. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 12:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Stop your reverts

See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_62#Multiple_infobox_chronologies. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

The EP pages still say "Coldplay EP chronology", if you don't want me to revert it, don't make incomplete edits. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 22:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Feel free to improve articles, that's great. Don't feel free to ignore consensus. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Pretty certain that making sure a chronology moves more smoothly is an improvement, making incomplete edits on the other hand... GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 23:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
How does it "move more smoothly"? Also, please follow consensus. Also, it was only one of the four articles and you could have easily fixed it yourself instead of complaining about it and acting like that somehow justifies your unjustifiable actions.................................................................................................... ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Only 5 out of 18 Coldplay EPs have their own page, not including them avoid numerous interruptions on the chronology. And it was not four articles, I had to edit all of the studio and live albums pages to remove the "albums" from "Coldplay albums chronology". Changing things were your endeavour, not mine, so I don't see how it's up to me to make corrections. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 23:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
It's not anyone in particular's job to do it, it's just your responsibility to follow consensus. Too bad that Coldplay have so many non-notable EPs, I guess. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
As per user "Isento", I skipped the releases without a page. Redirecting to Coldplay discography would be too complicated. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 00:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Okay. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Christmas Lights Elvises.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Christmas Lights Elvises.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Bakery (recording studio)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Bakery (recording studio) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phil Harvey (manager)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phil Harvey (manager) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Bakery (recording studio)

The article The Bakery (recording studio) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Bakery (recording studio) and Talk:The Bakery (recording studio)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Bakery (recording studio)

The article The Bakery (recording studio) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Bakery (recording studio) for comments about the article, and Talk:The Bakery (recording studio)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phil Harvey (manager)

The article Phil Harvey (manager) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Phil Harvey (manager) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FuzzyMagma -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Continents in world tours

I don't see the need to remove content from the tour dates table if a certain concert tour visits at least two continents. People wouldn't know which continent certain countries are in otherwise. 96.227.141.216 (talk) 19:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm assuming you're talking to me about Guts World Tour, right? Not diving the tour dates table by continents is a guideline from Wikipedia's Manual of Style. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 20:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, GustavoCza. Thank you for your work on Impact of the Music of the Spheres World Tour. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Reviewing; good work on the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx 01:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Please read

... If you put something up on Wikipedia, you must expect others to edit it. Your bloated article is ungrammatical and contains uncited claims.TheLongTone (talk) 14:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

The citations are in the article's body. I managed to promote multiple pages to Good status and reviewers often mention the head should not have too many references if those are already in the body. I also use grammar checkers when writing stuff, you can dislike my writing style but that's on you buddy. You should also consider be more polite, the world does not spin around English-language countries and I'm a Latin American editor. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 14:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
And since you are in my talk page, the section above you is literally a page reviewer saying I did a good job. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 14:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I would point out that altho your command of English is good, as a native speaker I am probably alert to infelicities of style which escape you. The page reviewerrs comment reflects an opinion, btw: it differs from mine.TheLongTone (talk) 14:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
"infelicities"? Liz Read! Talk! 19:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phil Harvey (manager)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phil Harvey (manager) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 01:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phil Harvey (manager)

The article Phil Harvey (manager) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Phil Harvey (manager) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... Hello! I would like to delete Wikipedia:WikiProject Coldplay/templates and Wikipedia:WikiProject Coldplay/help as I placed all of their contents on the main WikiProject Coldplay page for making things simpler. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 14:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Looks like you PRODded them already. NotAGenious (talk) 14:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Is it correct though? The template says "Please use PROD only on articles". Shouldn't I use something different since these pages are under "Wikipedia:"? GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 14:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Ah, my second comment didn't send;
I would say that these fit under WP:G6 criteria for speedy deletion, as you just moved them to the main Wikiproject page. But, to be sure, you could message User:Smileguy91 to get his opinion on the move, and he could tag the pages with WP:G7. Another venue for these kind of deletions is WP:MFD, though I don't think that exhausting the process would be beneficial in this case. NotAGenious (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
User:Smileguy91 only made three edits this year so far and has been inactive from WikiProject Coldplay since April 2013. I don't think they will answer to any messages. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 15:22, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirected with attribution. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The redirect makes sense. Thank you. NotAGenious (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Help me!

I just exported File:WikiProject Coldplay Logo.png to Wikimedia, so I would like to delete it from Wikipedia. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 15:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

See {{Now Commons}}. Primefac (talk) 17:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

IP Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GustavoCza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 177.220.179.76. This is my parents house wifi, there is nothing wrong with it. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 15:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have been able to edit after making this request. Additionally, that IP address is a confirmed p2p proxy. Yamla (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Applied Art Forms (brand)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Applied Art Forms (brand), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AM2-1 Modular Parka.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AM2-1 Modular Parka.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Jauerback. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User talk:Rodericksilly. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

In other words, stop edit warring on this user's talk page and making accusations. You need to WP:AGF now. If you continue to harass this user with constant talk page messages, you will be blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
He is watching over my edits, calling me a child by telling me to grow up, and I'm the one who is harassing? Alright then, thanks for teaching me that being an old editor has privileges, I will not mess with them again. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 20:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
No idea if that's true as you've provided absolutely no proof to back up your accusations. However, do you really think the constant talk page messages it is the way to resolve that? There are other avenues. Utilize them, if necessary. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
I made minor edits (which do not trigger notifications) and the reversion were their first edits of the day. I am supposed to believe they stumbled on the article coincidentally while entering on Wikipedia? The person who only contributed seven times to the pages which I have my focus on? I find it hard to assume good faith when the other side is assuming I am stupid. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 21:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
First of all, minor edits show up on a user's Watchlist. Secondly, see WP:MINOREDIT. These edits should not have been marked as a minor edit. Finally, being called a "paranoid child" was definitely a bit WP:BITEY, but quite frankly, I can't blame them for your continued unjustified harassment on their talk page. Feel free to go ahead and make a report on WP:ANI, but I wouldn't recommend it as you might get hit by a WP:BOOMERANG. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Make a report for what? The fact you are in my Talk page is already enough to show how old accounts have privileges and can offend new ones as they please. Very cheerful reading from the person who made seven edits to Coldplay against my 1,312 that my edits are useless. So much for being "mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors". GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 21:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
I have no idea how old your account is or how old their account is and quite frankly, I don't care. Also, see WP:OWN. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
It's not about ownership, it's about contribution. Calling an editor's contributions useless when they did more for an article than you is ridiculous. They also clearly violated the personal attacks guideline, but I am the one getting heat here. If that is not privilege, I don't know what it is. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 21:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
You can feel free to think that, but you'd be wrong. Have a good day. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
I've been harassed and someone came to defend the harasser just because I asked to be left alone, that can hardly be considered a good day. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 22:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Ok, consider this a final warning as you continue to cast aspersions without any evidence. From what I've seen, YOU were the one harassing. Continuing to do so is a violation of WP:NPA. So, I would strongly advise that you drop this stick and learn to WP:AGF. Feel free to get another opinion from a different admin if you disagree. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Grammar on The Eras Tour

Hi. "Controversy" is grammatically correct. Just like Philanthropy. Why did you not make it "Philanthropies" on the same article? Same logic. ℛonherry☘ 15:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't know, it looked strange the title being on the singular when the section itself has multiple sub-topics. It's not any hill I'm willing to die on though, English is not my first language. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 18:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Well, as a trilingual person, I'd agree that English is a weird language, LOL. Just kidding. This is one of English's peculiarities. "Controversy" as the section title is an uncountable, abstract noun, and not necessarily a countable, concrete noun. While we can also use "controversies" as a word in day to day life, it's grammatically incorrect. There are different genres/styles of music, but never different "musics". In our article, even the "Impact" section is titled singularly so, instead of "Impacts" eventhough the tour has impacted the society in many ways. Same logic! We are never supposed to use the plural forms of such words. Happy to help you with this! Regards. ℛonherry☘ 19:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
I will be correcting this on Impact of the Music of the Spheres World Tour then, thank you. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 19:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Coldplay

I agree with you on the capitalisation, but why do you think it's not correct to put the dates at the end? It's much more functional, flowing and aesthetically pleasing. JackkBrown (talk) 03:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

It's a history section, so putting the year first is not only more important, but also more logical. You present a time period and then what the person did on said period. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 03:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
How then do you explain the Frank Sinatra page? It's the same thing. Don't tell me "en.wiki" has made such a mistake about one of the most influential artists in American music culture... JackkBrown (talk) 03:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Again, please check WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. And even if we do consider that other stuff exists, we have articles such as The Beatles and Taylor Swift, which are listed as Featured and receive a lot more views than Frank Sinatra, meaning that more editors are making sure things are correct there. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 03:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Pollstar report for U2 Sphere shows

Can you point me to where the Pollstar report for U2's box office results is so we can cite it as a reference? Thanks. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 20:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Information icon Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 01:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Notes for tour locations

About your reversion of this edit, I beg to differ. I think for most readers, Manila and Lyon (for example) will be more familiar than Bocaue and Décines-Charpieu, and a note will be useful for that purpose. If you like, I can provide the references where those concerts are promoted as in those cities on the band's official website. Shuipzv3 (talk) 05:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Coldplay templates

Hello, GustavoCza,

If you want these template pages to be deleted, please take them to WP:TFD, do not tag them for speedy deletion. You've done this twice already, both times leading them to be untagged. You should try another way and that proper way with templates is to take them to TFD. Make your argument there. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Just to be clear, I don't want to delete the template themselves, they are very useful and I contributed to their current format. I want to delete those documentation subpages, are the guidelines the same? GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 07:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Sparks (Coldplay song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ken Nelson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coldplay February 9th and 10th Poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coldplay February 9th and 10th Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

GustavoCza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. This is the same Wifi I have used for like, over a year now. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 02:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I've granted IP block exemption for one year. If you continue to run into these problems after it expires, see the linked page for instructions on how to request it again. Spicy (talk) 15:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Yes, the unblock is still needed, I'm only being able to edit by using my phone's direct internet provider, which is very limited compared to my home's Wifi. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 02:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Ok. In that case, {{checkuser requested}}. This block was made by ST47ProxyBot, which occasionally makes errors on this sort of thing. Is there any technical evidence that 138.186.110.20 has been abused on Wikipedia as an open proxy? Alternatively, does the requesting user have a history of proxy use? If the answer is no to both, I would be willing to unblock the IP as a false positive. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
That's a misunderstanding of how p2p proxies work. I've granted IP block exemption. Spicy (talk) 15:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
The answer is no to both. I'm just an English/Portuguese student who loves Coldplay really. I don't have knowledge over proxy use, IP addresses and that sort of thing. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 02:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
The block information is here and expires tomorrow at 15:09 UTC. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
The expiry is somewhat irrelevant as the bot will re-block the IP if it's still being used as a p2p proxy (see the block log). Spicy (talk) 15:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for unblocking me. This was a really weird situation. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 15:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GustavoCza/Archive_2&oldid=1200105745"