User talk:Gurmeetchahal

December 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Punjabi language, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ternera (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Ternera, for addressing my edit. It was incomplete, and I intended to revert it. I will provide more comprehensive and accurate information in my future edits if needed. Appreciate your understanding. Gurmeetchahal (talk) 17:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Februrary 2024[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at BHU. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. User4edits (talk) 06:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"After conducting research, I realized the issue needed addressing and made efforts to change. I also attempted to contact you to discuss any concerns you may have had. Instead of simply reverting, we could have engaged in a discussion. Moving forward, I will utilize a sandbox environment. Thank you nonetheless." Gurmeetchahal (talk) 10:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are using AI generated replies, you can simply reply in your words too. I have replied to you on my Talk Page. Thanks. User4edits (talk) 11:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Madam, It really won't matter as long as I am replying myself from my account, I am real human and not a chatbot. You seem really don't want to edit anything. After my consecutive tries, you reverted each time. This is public platform and anyone can be contributor as long as one is legit. Let's settle this. There is no point of debating and wasting each other time. Thank You Gurmeetchahal (talk) 11:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, indeed, my dear interlocutor, I perceive your request for elucidation with regards to the matter at hand. Allow me to engage in the dissemination of information pertinent to your inquiry, albeit in a manner that may necessitate a modicum of intellectual exertion on your part for full comprehension.

In accordance with the premise outlined in your missive, I hereby proffer a response from my persona, unequivocally asserting authorship and proprietorship thereof. It behooves me to direct your esteemed attention to the repository of knowledge colloquially referred to as Wikipedia, wherein a compendium of guidelines and protocols awaits perusal.

Should you deign to embark upon this expedition of erudition, I implore you to commence your journey by consulting the document denoted as WP:WELCOME. Within its annals lie foundational precepts essential for the initiation of one's foray into the realm of Wikipedia editing. Engage with its contents, dear interlocutor, for therein lie the rudimentary tenets upon which the edifice of collaborative knowledge construction is erected.

Furthermore, I beseech you to acquaint yourself with the principles expounded within the sacred text known as WP:CITE. In its hallowed pages, one finds elucidation regarding the sacrosanct art of citation—a practice indispensable for the validation of assertions and the fortification of one's scholarly endeavors. Attend to its teachings with due diligence, for adherence thereto shall facilitate the propagation of veracity within the expanse of discourse.

Moreover, let us not overlook the imperative elucidation enshrined within the canonical treatise denominated WP:RS. Herein lies a compendium of wisdom pertaining to the discernment of reliable sources—a task fraught with nuance and complexity. Heed its counsel, dear interlocutor, for it is through the discernment of credible founts that the mantle of legitimacy is bestowed upon one's scholarly endeavors.

In conclusion, I commend unto you these tomes of enlightenment, each a beacon illuminating the path toward scholarly attainment and intellectual ascension. May your journey through the corridors of Wikipedia be marked by enlightenment and discovery, and may the fruits of your labor be duly recognized amidst the annals of collaborative knowledge construction. User4edits (talk) 13:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]