User talk:Graaf Statler

May 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. BethNaught (talk) 09:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bethnaught[edit]

@Betnnaught, what are you trying to proof? That every idiot can be a Sysop on the Wikimedia projects? Wel, you succeed. And, don't you think that Jimbo can't handel his user page himself and need you therefore? Well, you made the full out of yourself, because we are all trolls and testing how fullish people can be on the Internet. Very fullish you know. They are my best friends, CaAl, Trijnstel after I was one of the few people, and mabey the only one, who found out they were trolls. Best regards. Graaf Statler (talk) 10:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Graaf Statler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reason::This sysop is a idiot. Like most Wikimedia/pedia sysops

Decline reason:

Add me to the list of idiots who think those who persistently make personal attacks like yours should be excluded from the project. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Only because I am saying that Trijnstel is a <redacted> by advising a boy, age 15, who's articles are copyvio and who did a false copyvio request, to make a global blocking request? And that CaAL is a sokpopmaster? What he is? And because I am saying that the sysop who is blocking me for this a idiot is? What he is? What is wrong with that? It is the same like blocking someone who is saying a dockter is a dockter. And what do you think about yourself? iI don't spent one minute more on this madhouse and it patiences. How was the saying, Where fulls rush in, angels fear to tread? Ore something like that? About critism? and no, I don't make a list, because I don't know were to start or to stop. Have a nice day. Graaf Statler (talk) 11:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you are using this talk page to continue your personal attacks, I have revoked your ability to edit it. I have also redacted an accusation that has sexual connotations in the English language. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Exciting...[edit]

...to see that someone who was uncovered My Terrible Secret actually has a Wikipedia account--or had, of course, in this case (I had no idea who you were, and now that I look at your edit history I'm not surprised). Ha, I'm the same person as MoiraMoira? Because I speak Dutch? Hey, MoiraMoira, did you know this? And we're also Natuur12? Ach, je hebt volledig gelijk, ik geef het op. I'll dedicate the rest of my life to living differently, not with "A rhythm which is not natural". Moira, it's 9:15AM here. Can you bring me another cup of coffee? Drmies (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]