User talk:Give it back

Sockpuppets and spam

Hi, Jsimlo... Don't think that because you created a new account to and spam links to your site and even created a whole article about your own software program that we won't be able to catch you spamming and delete the link and article. You aren't fooling anyone. DreamGuy 21:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

So much for Wikipedia:Assume good faith. I guess you should think first and write later. Give it back 18:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

I have found out in the history of Talk:Nonogram that jsimlo actually helped you and removed several of the external links on his own and never added a link to himself again. Yet, you assume this had to be him and went on a crusade against him. Very nice! Give it back 23:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

re:Accusations of a Sockpuppet

Excuse me for the short reply, but I have final exams in two weeks and I gotta start studying. :) Regarding your accusations, let me remind you that DreamGuy does have a right to suspect you of sockpuppeteering. Has he submitted a checkuser request? If not, then he shouldn't be leaving a tag on your userpage without trying to investigate further into the situation. This is because we don't want to leave a bad impression on newcomers (like you) Would you like me to file a checkuser for you? I can't make any guarantees, but it will verify whether you are a sockpuppet or not.--Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?} 01:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, he does not seem to need to investigate, yet. He just wanted to scare me by bitching around, 'cos I crossed his line. If it will not help, I shall ask for a check filing, though User:DreamGuy should have done so. Give it back 07:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)