User talk:Geis0099
September 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Victor Lyatkher, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 23:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
| Wikipedia:Babel | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 23:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Victor Lyatkher, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Foundation Financial Group was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 22:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Foundation Financial Group was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:29, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I'm Flightx52 and I approve this message 00:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)October 2011[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Foundation Financial Group, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. pluma Ø 22:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I am the editor of the page and deleted my old version as I had a new version. Whoever deleted my new version that I spend hours making, please put it back. I am not a vandal and don't go around vandalizing Wikipedia sites.
Talkback[edit]
Message added 00:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
pluma Ø 00:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Resilient Barnstar |
| For remaining as a Wikipedian even with accusations of vandalism. pluma Ø 21:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC) |
Adoption offer![edit]
I am part of a program on Wikipedia called Adopt-a-User. Adopt-a-user has experienced editors "adopt" new users in order to show them the ropes. I'm fltyingpig (AKA pluma). I will give you a few fun tasks to do to help you learn to use Wikipedia and I will also answer any of your questions. If you wish to be adopted by me, please tell me on my talk page. Even if you don't want to be adopted, you can still ask me questions whenever you like Happy editing! pluma Ø 21:57, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 22:02, 22 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
pluma Ø 22:02, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Lesson 1: Wikimarkups 101[edit]
Hi! I'm happy to adopt you! Here is your first task. If you think this assignment looks big, don't worry. It's smaller than it looks. If there is anything you want to know in particular, or if you have questions, please ask me on my talk page whenever.
Introduction to markups[edit]
The most important element of Wikipedia (in my opinion) are wikimarkups, so we will start there. To create your sand box page, click User:1966batfan/sandbox, where you can make test edits. Please complete the task there. When you have completed the task, I will give you another one.
You already know how to edit pages. The interesting bit, however, is getting things to look, well, interesting. There are a number of different bits of code that you can use in your editing to create different effects when the page is saved - they can be as simple as bold text or italics, but different bits of code can be combined to make a very appealing layout.
I should warn you that in most cases, special formatting is frowned upon in articles. It should only be used in certain situations, and when it is necessary to illustrate a particular point. Aside from those cases, text in articles should be just as you see it in this sentence - plain black, with only the occasional wikilink to spice things up.
What I'm going to do first is to show you where you can go to test all this out while you're reading. There are a few places: you can go to the main sandbox that everyone uses at Wikipedia:Sandbox. This is a special page that is cleaned out every hour automatically, that gives editors a place to play with new code and vandals a place to vandalize other than our articles. The only problem with the sandbox is this: Whatever you save there isn't likely to stay for long, and there is a high chance of you getting hit with a few edit conflicts. So, to avoid that, you can create your own sandbox! On Wikipedia, you are able to tack "subpages" onto your main user page to use for testing things out, writing new articles, or other projects like what we're doing here. Your sandbox page is a subpage of your userpage. You can create user subpages by searching for the page you want to create in the search box. It won't find it, of course, however a red link will appear at the top of the page. Click on that, and edit away! For example, try searching for User:Geis0099/sandbox and creating it. Another place you can make test edits is in my sandbox in the guest area.
Markups[edit]
Here we go! These are the basic wikimarkups. You may know how to use some, but others you may not know.
This section is very basic. For more detailed information, see Help:Wiki markup
- In order to make an internal link, type the page you want to link to and place two brackets on either side of the text. Example: for a link to the page dog, type "[[dog]]. If you wish to make a link to one page where you wish to type something other than the page name, write
[[The page you want to link to|desired text]]
The pipe character (|) can be typed with shift+\. Internal links are generally only used to link to pages that could be confused with the pages subject, or pages that explain parts of the text without having to duplicate the material. However, no one will get mad at you if you use links for any other reason. If you make a link to a page that doesn't exist, the link will appear in red. If you click on the red link, it will give you the opportunity to create that page.
- This isn't really a wikimarkup, but in order to make a carriage return, you must type enter twice for it to work. There are some exceptions to this, though.
- The main exceptions for the above are bullets and numbering. To place a bullet, type an asterisk (*) at the beginning of a line. An indented bullet is two asterisks. You will not have to press enter twice to make a carriage return. To place numbering, type an octothorpe (#) at the beginning of a line. An indented number is two octothorpe. You will not have to press enter twice to make a carriage return while using numbering, either.
- To indent, use the colon (:) at the beginning of the line. A double indent is two colons. When responding to something on a talk page, indent your response; if you are responding to a response, indent twice, and so on.
- To place bold text, type
'''text you want in bold'''.
Bold is generally only used when you are repeating the page's title in the first sentence of an article or section. For example, in the page dog, the first sentence is, The dog is the domesticated form of a grey wolf (notice what is in bold). Bold text is not used for emphasis.
- To place italicised text, type
''text you want in italics''.
Note that there are three apostrophes for bold text and two for italics. Italics are usually used for emphasis, in stead of bold.
- To place Bold and italicised text, use five apostrophes on either side of the desired text. Type
'''''Bold and italicised text'''''
Bold and italicised text is only used for emphasis on the title.
- To insert an image type:
[[File:Example.png|thumb|Caption text]].
To search for pictures, click the magnifying glass in the search bar to enter the search bar. Uncheck all of the boxes in the "Search in namespaces:" section other than the one for file. Then search for what you want a picture of. To upload your own picture to the wiki, click on the "upload file" link in the toolbox section on the right side of the window under the Wikipedia logo. Once you have clicked the link, just follow the instructions they give you.
- References! To sit your source, type
<ref>your source</ref>.
- If you think their is text somewhere that needs a source, type
{{citation needed}}
- When you make a citation, your citation will show up not where you cited it, but at the bottom of the page in the references section. If you are the first to site a source on a page, make a references section at the bottom of the page (==References==), then below the heading, type
"<references />".
- External links: To use external links, type:
[Page'sURL desired text]
Internal links are generally used only in the
- Last one: If you are wondering why the above examples have the text for markups, but aren't doing anything, it is because I placed nowiki markups around them. Nowiki markups, when placed around a markup, make the markup not work. To place Nowiki markups, type
<nowiki>Markup you don't want to work</nowiki>.
Nowiki markups will be rarely used, just because they aren't very useful.
Assignment[edit]
Use all of those wikimarkups at least once on your sandbox page (it doesn't have to be remotely coherent) or my sandbox page in the guest sandbox. I will check on the page and give you another task. If any part of my instructions don't make sense, or if you have any questions, please tell me on my talk page. Happy editing!
pluma Ø 00:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- I saw that you have started your homework. It looks good so far, but I just wanted to let you know that you don't have to sign your edit summaries, because it won't work and will show up as four tildes. Signatures are only for talk pages. Happy editing! pluma Ø 01:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 02:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
pluma Ø 02:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 02:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
pluma Ø 02:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Vandalism[edit]
Sorry this was late. Anyway, unfortunately, not everybody edits Wikipedia in a a good way. When editors make edits that are not appropriate, we call this vandalism. To counter vandalism, there are some tools one can use to revert it, or remove it.
Introduction to vandalism[edit]
To start off, let's get some background. Wikipedia is, as you have probably figured out by now 
, a wiki, meaning anyone can edit virtually any page. This is both a blessing and a curse, however, as while it does allow a wide range of information to be added and shared, it also allows people with less than benevolent intentions to come in and mess around with stuff. It requires a fair amount of work during every hour of every day to ensure that this vandalism does not run rampant and destroy the project. Fortunately, with a near-endless supply of volunteers across the world, this doesn't really cause a problem. The addition of various tools help aid our cause and make the "reversion", or removal, of vandalism happen within minutes (sometimes seconds).
What we define vandalism as is "an unhelpful or non-constructive edit" to an article or other page. Most commonly, these are pretty blatant - replacing a whole page or section with curse words, simply removing entire sections, and so forth. Occasionally, it's less obvious, like changing key words in a section to completely alter the meaning. Basically, anything that can't be helpful at all to the article should be considered vandalism, however you should always remember to assume good faith for questionable cases.
Special:RecentChanges[edit]
The most commonly used, and arguably the most critical tool in this respect, is Special:RecentChanges. Recent Changes is a special page that lists every edit made across the project within the last few minutes. You can find a link to it in the toolbar to the left in the "toolbox" section. The page is formatted similarly to a page's history, with a few differences. Here's how a standard entry generally looks:
- (diff) (hist) . . Shigeru Miyamoto; 14:32 . . (+28) . . 201.152.102.192 (Talk) (→Competition with Sony and Microsoft)
So that you can know all the terminology (which in some cases will be used across the site), I'm going to explain what all of this means. Feel free to skip this if you've already clicked the links.
A "diff" is the difference between two revisions. Wikipedia has a special feature that allows you to compare revisions to see exactly what was changed. This is particularly useful when on vandal patrol, as this is the best thing available to tell you if the edit was or was not vandalism. Clicking on the link above will only take you to the help page on diffs, unfortunately, however an actual diff link will bring you to a screen that looks like this one, an actual diff of another article. Content removed appears in red text in a yellow box on the left; content added appears in red text in a green box on the right. The "hist" link will bring you to the page's history. You can click on the "hist" link above to get to the help page for this feature. A page's history lists all edits ever made to a page, something which is required under the terms of the GFDL, Wikipedia's licensing. The next link is the article that the edit was made to. The time stamp will indicate when the edit was made. The time will appear in your time zone, as you have it defined in your Special:Preferences. Note that this is different from signature timestamps, which are always in UTC/GMT time. The green or red number after the timestamp will tell you how much was added or removed to the article in the edit. A green "+" number shows the number of bytes added to the article - a red "-" number indicates the number removed. In general, the number of bytes is equal to the number of characters, however this is not always the case: Certain special characters can contain more than one byte, and templates can completely mess this number up. Templates will be covered in another lesson later on, however you will be using some in your patrols later. This number will be in bold if a very large number of characters were removed, which is usually a good indicator of vandalism. The next part is the name of the user who made the edit, which will link to their user page. In this case, an IP address made the edit, so the link will instead go to their contributions. Since most vandalism comes from these anonymous editors, this serves as another convenience to those on patrol. The user name is followed by a link to their talk page. The last part of a RC report is the edit summary. When editing a section of an article, the title of that section will automatically be included in the edit summary, as you see above. Other special edit summaries include "Replaced page with..." and "Blanked the page". In general, these last two are dead giveaways for vandalism edits, however you will occasionally see an editor blank his own user or user talk page, so be careful about that.
Types of vandalism[edit]
There are 20 recognized types of vandalism, but the following are the ones you will run into the most frequently. The complete list can be found at WP:VANDTYPES.
- Blanking, illegitimate
- Removing all or significant parts of a page's content without any reason, or replacing entire pages with nonsense. Sometimes referenced information or important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary. However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary.
- Blanking that could be legitimate includes blanking all or part of a biography of a living person. Wikipedia is especially concerned about providing accurate and unbiased information on the living; blanking may be an effort to remove inaccurate or biased material. Due to the possibility of unexplained good-faith content removal, {{uw-test1}} or {{uw-delete1}}, as appropriate, should be used as initial warnings for content removals without more descriptive edit summaries.
- Page creation, illegitimate
- Creating new pages with the sole intent of malicious behavior. Includes blatant advertising pages, personal attack pages (articles written to disparage the subject), blatant POV pushes, hoaxes and other intentionally inaccurate pages. New users may sometimes create test pages containing nonsense or even autobiographies, and doing so is not vandalism, though such pages are normally speedily deleted. Also, creating a page on a topic that is simply not notable is not vandalism.
- Silly vandalism
- Adding profanity, graffiti, or patent nonsense to pages; creating nonsensical and obviously unencyclopedic pages, etc. However, the addition of random characters to pages is often characteristic of an editing test and, though impermissible, may not be malicious.
- Talk page vandalism
- Illegitimately deleting or editing other users' comments. However, it is acceptable to blank comments constituting vandalism, internal spam, or harassment or a personal attack. It is also acceptable to identify an unsigned comment. Users are also permitted to remove comments from their own user talk pages. A policy of prohibiting users from removing warnings from their own talk pages was considered and rejected on the grounds that it would create more issues than it would solve.
- User and user talk page vandalism
- Unwelcome, illegitimate edits to another person's user page may be considered vandalism. User pages are regarded as within the control of their respective users and, with certain exceptions, should not be edited without permission of the user to whom they belong. See WP:UP#OWN. Related is Wikipedia:No personal attacks.
Undoing vandalism[edit]
Undoing vandalism is fairly simple. When you see something in recent changes that could be vandalism, click on the diff link. You will then see two columns. The one on the left will be yellow, while the one on the right will be green. If the one on the left is vandalism, click on a link to the side of the green sections heading that says (undo). Check carefully before undoing an edit, though, because some edits that appear to be vandalism are not vandalism. I must warn you that you will find some cases of vandalism that will offend you. Don't take it seriously.
Homework[edit]
Go to Special:RecentChanges and find five places where there is vandalism. If you find vandalism, undo it. Pay extra attention to IP edits, for vandalism is done almost exclusively by IPs. Try to be very lenient on sort of bad new pages (these will be distinguishable in Recent Changes by the giant N next to the entry). If you don't see three examples of vandalism in one set of recent changes, just refresh the page and look for some. Please tell me the names of the pages you cleaned up on my talk page, as well as why they are considered vandalism. Good luck! pluma Ø 19:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
An award for you![edit]
|
Award of First Success | |
| For completing your first task. I know this is a little bit late, but then, better late than never! Awards, usually called barnstars, are ways of showing appreciation to another user. We'll talk about how to give them later. Good job and happy editing! pluma Ø 18:30, 30 October 2011 (UTC) |
Adoption page[edit]
I have created a page that contains all the adoptee tasks here. If you have any questions, let me know, and happy editing as always! pluma Ø 19:39, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Also ould you tell me whenever you complete a task? How many have you done so far? Thank you and happy editing! pluma Ø 19:40, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 22:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
pluma Ø 22:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Foundation Financial Group, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Foundation Financial Group[edit]
Hello Geis0099. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Foundation Financial Group.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Foundation Financial Group}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)