User talk:Gearbox162

May 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wikimedia Foundation has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wikimedia Foundation was changed by Gearbox162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936288 on 2017-05-27T15:39:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:39, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think as you're new here it is harsh to call your activities "vandalism", but you do need to take note of our policies on sourcing. For instance your addition about the primary school at Brandon, Suffolk includes "there is talk" and "people say", and that is not sufficient for a Wikipedia article. Please cite reliable sources for any information you add – if your "source" is just your own knowledge or something people have mentioned in conversation, it unfortunately is regarded as "original research" and cannot be included. If unsure about any of this please ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Teahouse where they specialise in assisting new editors: Noyster (talk), 21:06, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on Human[edit]

Is it possible to make a more constructive, easy-to-read edit on Human? I appreciate a well-meaning edit (yes, our species is demonstrably violent, but the way you assert that in your sentence seems to 'write a blank check' to the violent tendencies. Also, that sentence doesn't read like a clear, English-language sentence. MaynardClark (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nap. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 14:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Siesta, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Asus X555DG[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Asus X555DG. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Asus Vivo#VivoBook X Series. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Asus Vivo#VivoBook X Series. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at Talk:Asus Vivo.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Washing Day[edit]

The article Washing Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition, nothing encyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 17:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Plotagon[edit]

The article Plotagon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 07:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to IPhone 6S has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: IPhone 6S was changed by Gearbox162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922947 on 2018-01-21T11:33:25+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roblox Ban[edit]

A tag has been placed on Roblox Ban requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Irrelevant

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Super Ψ Dro 19:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Features of YouTube[edit]

I deleted that article, which was simply copied from YouTube. First of all, there was no need for this, nor did you explain why you did it. Secondly, please see WP:Copying within Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IOS 13[edit]

Hello Gearbox162,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged IOS 13 for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with IOS 13. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 18:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

F1 calendar[edit]

A slot can be stil found despite this sprint break. In any case, that information should not be mentioned there as it is not a real "change" to the calendar. Island92 (talk) 20:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]