User talk:Gavrilov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Gavrilov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

However please notice that this site is not intended for somehing like a personal blog, or as a personal webpage provider, but a encyclopedia. Thus your user page is intended for a short introduction of yourself, while this talk page is intended for communication with other wikipedians on writing of this encyclopedia. andy 21:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --WillMcC 19:46, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Old age. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 12:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicts of interest[edit]

Hello Gavrilov. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --CliffC (talk) 12:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gavrilov[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Gavrilov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ukexpat (talk) 19:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged - see our guideline Writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. --WillMcC (talk) 10:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External Links[edit]

Publications[edit]

Preliminary findings have already been published.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Gavrilova N.S., Gavrilov L.A. "Ageing and Longevity: Mortality Laws and Mortality Forecasts for Ageing Populations [In Czech: Stárnutí a dlouhověkost: Zákony a prognózy úmrtnosti pro stárnoucí populace]." Demografie, 2011, 53(2): 109-128.
  2. ^ Gavrilov L.A., Gavrilova N.S. "Early-Life Predictors of Exceptional Longevity in the United States: Why Centenarians are Different from Their Shorter-Lived Siblings." Living to 100 Monograph [published online – September 6, 2011]. The Society of Actuaries, 2011, 20 pages
  3. ^ Gavrilova N.S., Gavrilov L.A. "Mortality Measurement and Modeling Beyond Age 100." Living to 100 Monograph [published online – September 6, 2011]. The Society of Actuaries, 2011, 22 pages
  4. ^ Gavrilova NS, Gavrilov LA. "Can exceptional longevity be predicted? "Contingencies (Journal of the American Academy of Actuaries), 2008, July/August: 82-88.
  5. ^ Gavrilova NS, Gavrilova LA. "Physical and socioeconomic characteristics at young age as predictors of survival to 100: a study of a new historical data resource (U.S. WWI draft cards)." In living to 100 and beyond: Survival at advanced ages [online monograph]. The Society of Actuaries, 2008.
  6. ^ Gavrilova NS, Gavrilov LA. "Search for predictors of exceptional human longevity: using computerized genealogies and internet resources for human longevity studies." N Am Actuarial J, 2007, 11: 49-67.

Proposed deletion of Reliability theory of aging and longevity[edit]

The article Reliability theory of aging and longevity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lots of OR and SYNTH, created by author of the "theory". No independent references (those that are not by Gavrilov were published evebn before this "theory" was formulated.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reliability theory of aging and longevity for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reliability theory of aging and longevity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliability theory of aging and longevity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 20:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Reliability theory of aging and longevity[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Reliability theory of aging and longevity, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from https://www.soe.ucsc.edu/events/event/179, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Reliability theory of aging and longevity saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 11:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please note that for the record, I regret any off-putting that such walls of deletion reviews and copyright notices may make. Subject-matter experts are increasingly invaluable to Wikipedia, and these procedures are due more to the presentation of the material than the actual content; Wikipedia has developed certain requirements in order to be able to defend and maintain its status as an open-source provider of information, but these are all in the interest of fairly producing the most comprehensive work within the context of copyright obligations. Please don't think that your work is being deemed "not good enough for Wikipedia" or any such judgement; on the contrary, I will be working to integrate it into Wikipedia, so would greatly value your input. Should you be thinking about re-engaging in editing, but have any reservations, please feel free to message me on my talk page or e-mail me. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 11:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gavrilov&oldid=755845441"