User talk:Frithewlf

User Norum[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frithewlf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would love to have my account unblocked. I have been an editor since 2005. Yes, I confess to vandalising Emma Gonzalez' wikipage and I am sorry for that. I confess that I was under the influence of alcohol when I did it. I am trully sorry for this and, if unblocked, I promise not to do anything that would cause me being blocked forever. Saying this, I still believe that Daniel Case didn't give me the opportunity to defend myself and he actually completely blocked me as I was typing my appeal. I was at work when the original message was left on my wall. When I came back several hours later, I was already blocked from editing pages. I was unable to defend myself right away and was blocked before I was able to say anything. This is why I believe this was nothing short of a kangaroo court. That alone I believe could be questioned. Daniel Case actually believedd that my account was hacked whereas I clearly stated that I was under the influence of alcohol, but he opted to ignore that fact. I actually was able to tell him that my 72 hr block was up and I was requesting to be unblocked. At that time I did mention that I wa slooking into filling out a complaint agaisnt him as I believe he abuse dhis admin powers. His reply was you're going to find this to be rather difficult. That alone should raise question. Not to mention that user Daniel Case completely blocked me as I was typing my appeal I also believe that user Anna Frodesiak was verbally harrassing me as she called me a racist without any solid evidence. Frithewlf (talk) 00:26, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Once you assert that your account was compromised, we must leave it blocked. Even if what you say is true and that you were drunk while making those edits, it would be difficult to trust that you would not do so again. Further, your request mentions the behavior of and attacks others, which you seem to have a history of having done based on your user talk page. I do not see a benefit to the project in unblocking you. I am declining this request, and blocking this account as well. You will need to appeal your block from your original account(and seem to already have done so) using the UTRS. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2018[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.331dot (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Frithewlf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21270 was submitted on Apr 20, 2018 14:21:13. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]