User talk:Freedomlibertyrebels

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Freedomlibertyrebels, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Norvoid (talk) 15:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of National Front (United States)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on National Front (United States) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Norvoid (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

response[edit]

This is a group i am affiliated with. I created this page to share knowledge about this group. I figured a wiki was a peoples encyclopedia, not a regulated one. So if you think people dont need to know this go ahead and dictate our information you fascist pigs. If you delete this page im done with this fake statist joke of a free information source. Good day nazis Freedomlibertyrebels (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article[edit]

Wikipedia has rules. Articles have to pass our notability policies, in this case WP:GROUP IMO. All articles should be referenced with reliable independent sources to prove the notability. It doesn't matter what the politics of the group are, or, as was said, how big it is. (Big ones tend to be more notable, but that isn't always the case.) When/if you can prove notability with sound sources, you are welcome to try again. However, I will quote you from the deleted talk page: "i created this page so people can get information on us". That isn't what Wikipedia is for. That is promotion. We aren't here to help any party, singer, author or even hamster to become well known. When they are, then we'll record them. We do have an article about a bus shelter on a Scottish island, referenced on both sides of the Atlantic, so we aren't sticking to conventional lines of thought. Incidentally, I'm on the other side of the Atlantic, and don't give a damn about your politics. I can't vote for you or against you. Peridon (talk) 17:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Behave[edit]

It's kind of cheeky to complain about someone's "vulgar language" after you've called them a Nazi. Knock it off, or I'll block you from editing. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please note that almost every one of your edits have been reverted by several different people, for the same reason. You can't just make up a political party's philosophy, you need to refer to reliable sources. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Call me cheeky 1 more time

January 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 172.56.42.103 (talk) 01:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So fixing errors is vandalism? Wikipedia really is a corrupt network.

@Freedomlibertyrebels: This looks like posting nonsense on another users' talkpage rather than "fixing errors" to me: [1] 172.56.42.103 (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me? You think this is about me calling that jerk out? No, this is about me creating a legitimate page that was deleted because it was 'useless information' to the moderator who read it. Isnt all information useful? Isnt half of wikipedia useless information

He then had the audacity to say i havent done anything but vandalize wikipedia, after all the hours of work i have put in to perfecting me corrections

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being unable to edit collaboratively with others. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 02:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]