User talk:Foxxygrandpa

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Foxxygrandpa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Mexican Army have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Legion fi (talk) 23:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert the Lanix page?[edit]

You reverted the Lanix page to before my edits. Why did you do so? My copy is better written, and the facts I deleted are not sourced. What I am saying is, "let's add citations to my copy" and we can bring facts from the old one to my copy, too. You have to explain yourself or I will revert the page to my copy, simply because it is better written. Both don't have citations, so of course the better written version is what readers should see. Fleetham (talk) 17:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you didn't respond or change the Lanix page back to my copy. I will revert the page to my copy. Please add citations to my copy, as it is better written. I did delete some numerical facts, but these and their needed citations and can be added to my copy. Fleetham (talk) 21:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you didn't respond and you reverted my revert. Let's talk about this because I don't like you reverting my copy back to a poorly-sourced, badly-written prior version. If you want to add sources, I think that's great. I don't understand your reluctance to add them at my copy. Fleetham (talk) 06:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will simply revert your edits if you don't want to explain yourself. Your edits are unproductive and readers should be confronted by the best possible page. Fleetham (talk) 06:51, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you talk here? I really don't think I omitted much, and a lot of what I did omit was numbers. I think if you can tell me what facts you find wanting in my copy I can introduce them. Or add them yourself. But don't keep a well-written page in reserve to preserve something that is only mildly more informative and significantly less well made. Fleetham (talk) 07:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your responding through the edit summary. Please talk here so we can come to an agreement. If you are reverting the page to a poorly-written prior edit for a purpose, you should talk about that purpose here. I will continue to revert your edits if you refuse to discuss them. Fleetham (talk) 16:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lanix 3d TV[edit]

Your additions to the Lanix page aren't supported by their given citations. The citations in the "3d tv" section do talk about 3d tvs, but make no mention of Lanix. Fleetham (talk) 03:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mercedez Benz & BMW in Mexico[edit]

Foxxygrandpa: Your entries on Mercedez Benz Mexico are completely unknown in Mexico, do you have any references? Particularly the "Mercedes-Benz-Valdez-Xicotencatl de Mexico S.A. de C.V." is not recognized by any personnel of Daimler neither in Mexico nor Gemany. Furthemore this entity is not a registered company in Mexico by any account.

Additionally, the figures and manufacturing of Mercedes and BMW in Mexico you added are not verifiable. Altough some vehicles have been assembled as kits in the past, and some (BMW) are converted to armoured or security variants, a Police car built in Mexico from a S-class MB or a 700-series BMW is science fiction, nor ever built nor ever used by security forces in Mexico.

I have reverted to a more simple but accurate entry, and deleted unaccurate entries, particularly when it comes to Police variants of MB and BMW cars in Mexico, which is unheard of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpfs (talk • contribs) 18:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]