User talk:Forthe1789usconstitution

I'd like to know what folks would think about starting a wiki page on police brutality? The regular documentation of it from around the world. What would you think about doing something like that and who would be interested in contributing to that page with me? Let me know via messaging. Thanks!

Nomination of Edmund F. Brennan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edmund F. Brennan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund F. Brennan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 12:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reconsideration.

June 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Laser brain. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Elvis Presley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 11:52, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. May I inquire as to what has been removed to the history section for the Elvis Presley page? Thank you kindly for informing me.

It's all been removed. You introduced speculative text that was not reliably sourced. There are two essential Wikipedia pages you should read carefully: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:No original research. These describe what kinds of sources are appropriate for Wikipedia articles, and how to avoid personal interpretations in your writing. Additionally, Elvis Presley is a Featured article, meaning it should maintain the highest quality of writing and sources. --Laser brain (talk) 13:08, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. And thank you for the clarification as well as the help. I will get those citations for the necessary edits I wish to make, because neither the Mahalia Jackson and Elvis Presley connection has been cited or noted on the page, and the treatment of Elvis Presley's remains/body has not been noted on the page. And I very much do not appreciate this being left out of this page.

Additionally, there seems to be an issue that whenever I make corrections to pages, asserting historical significance or noting inaccuracies there seems to be an issue with, "cite your sources". When I do cite my sources, immediately, or after the fact, they say, "cite your sources". What part of, "here it is in black and white" don't folks understand? Forthe1789usconstitution (talk) 13:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the following citations for the Elvis Presley page - I'll even let you review my friend and make the notations yourself.

Link #1 http://elvispresleyphotos.com/celebrities/mahalia_jackson.html

Link #2 http://www.elvis-history-blog.com/elvis-canada.html

Link #3 http://www.musiclyric4christian.com/elvis-presley-sang-gospel.html

This will get you started my friend. I'll be back with more later. Forthe1789usconstitution (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, did you read the page I linked for you, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources? It can be a bit difficult to parse in one sitting, I grant you, but it should offer some advice on determining which sources are reliable. Those you just listed are not reliable for the purposes of Wikipedia. I'm sure you can imagine that a lot of information about Elvis is contentious and so we need to stick to high-quality, vetted sources. I am speaking of books and scholarly sources where there is strong evidence of fact-checking, editorial process, and a good reputation among serious scholars of the subject. We cannot include text citing blogs and amateur/fan sites about Elvis. --Laser brain (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Forthe1789usconstitution/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 09:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Forthe1789usconstitution, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Happysailor ^(Talk) 09:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Forthe1789usconstitution/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Forthe1789usconstitution. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lakun.patra (talk) 07:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 16[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

New donations - science, humanities, and video resources
Using hashtags in edit summaries - a great way to track a project
A new cite archive template, a new coordinator, plus conference and Visiting Scholar updates
Metrics for the Wikipedia Library's last three months

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 17[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria

New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 18[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads

New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 19[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti

New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
New Library Card Platform and Conference news
Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links

Read the full newsletter

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 20[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)

Partner resource expansions
New search tool for finding TWL resources
#1lib1ref 2017
Wikidata Visiting Scholar

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 21[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

#1lib1ref 2017
Wikipedia Library User Group
Wikipedia + Libraries at Wikimedia Conference 2017
Spotlight: Library Card Platform

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 22[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017

New and expanded research accounts
Global branches update
Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 23[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017

Library card
User Group update
Global branches update
Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
Bytes in brief

Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 24[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017

User Group update
Global branches update
- Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Nomination of Edmund F. Brennan for deletion[edit]

June 2015[edit]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 17)[edit]

Your draft article, User:Forthe1789usconstitution/sandbox[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 16[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 17[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 18[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 19[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 20[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 21[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 22[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 23[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 24[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 25[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 26[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 27[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 28[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 29[edit]

Books & Bytes, Issue 30[edit]

Books & Bytes, Issue 31[edit]

Books & Bytes, Issue 32[edit]

Books & Bytes, Issue 33[edit]

Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 36[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 37[edit]

Issue 38, January – April 2020[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 40[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 41[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 42[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 42[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 43[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 45[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 46[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 47[edit]