User talk:FlyingLeopard2014/Archives/2014/FY
Saturday: NYC Art And Feminism Wikipedia Editathon[edit]
 |
Please join Wikipedia "Art and Feminism Editathon" @ Eyebeam on Saturday February 1, 2014, an event aimed at collaboratively expanding Wikipedia articles covering Art and Feminism, and the biographies of women artists! There are also regional events that day in Brooklyn, Westchester County, and the Hudson Valley.
|
Thanked Edit[edit]
You are welcome!--Carliitaeliza TALK 22:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah Sneaky vandalism is hard to detect,do you understand Spanish I guess--Carliitaeliza TALK 22:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
why can't I blank my talk page?[edit]
i read the dumb msg already. no need to keep trash around --76.64.180.9 (talk) 02:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- FYI any user can blank their user talk page for any (or no) reason. Blankings like that shouldn't be reverted, even if users are blanking warnings. Prodego talk 04:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of rollback[edit]
Hello. I noticed that you performed a rollback on this edit (revert diff). Please note that rollback should only be used to revert obvious vandalism. In this case, you were reverting an edit that 1. Was not vandalism, 2. Was performed by a bot that was only trying to do its job and 3. The sandboxes are not permanent storage space for your articles. Bots will regularly clean the sandboxes and you should not revert them. Please only use rollback for appropriate means. K6ka (talk | contribs) 04:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, I was on Sandbox with the intention of making my own test edits, not reverting vandalism. I knew that the bots were there to clean the Sandbox and did not think that their edits were vandalism. On occasion, I see users (myself included) using rollback feature to do a self revert. NHRHS2010 RIP M.H. (1994-2014) 04:21, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Using rollback to revert your own edits is perfectly fine, even if your edits were constructive (though I don't see why you would do that most of the time). However, this wasn't a self-revert. Test edits in the sandbox is fine, but when the bots clean the sandbox, let them do their job. Nobody really cares about test edits anyone makes (unless they just happen to be in that sort of thing).
- Seeing that you are a registered editor, it may be better for you to make your test edits in your own personal sandbox, found here. You can do pretty much anything you want there, and you don't need to worry about bots cleaning it (because nobody cares about that sandbox, so you can play in it and make a big of a mess as you want in it). K6ka (talk | contribs) 04:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- nah I'd still clean it either way so it does not matter whether I use the regular Sandbox or my own. It's just a test edit. (I just saw that admin Prodego used the regular Sandbox to make one test edit and reverted himself). NHRHS2010 RIP M.H. (1994-2014) 04:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Seeing that you are a registered editor, it may be better for you to make your test edits in your own personal sandbox, found here. You can do pretty much anything you want there, and you don't need to worry about bots cleaning it (because nobody cares about that sandbox, so you can play in it and make a big of a mess as you want in it). K6ka (talk | contribs) 04:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Upcoming Saturday events - March 1: Harlem History Editathon and March 8: NYU Law Editathon[edit]
| Upcoming Saturday events - March 1: Harlem History Editathon and March 8: NYU Law Editathon | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join upcoming Wikipedia "Editathons", where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on a selected theme, on the following two Saturdays in March:
| |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Foul-mouthed IP[edit]
I did see your note at AIV, but I usually like to leave the talkpage unblocked initially just to give them a fair chance at requesting an unblock. When it becomes apparent that isn't going to happen - as in this case - talkpage revocation is only a mouse-click away. Incidentally, RPP would be a pretty slow way to get the talkpage access removed - your best bet would be AIV again (or you could just ask me!). Thanks for keeping a watchful eye out. Yunshui 雲水 14:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Former talk pages[edit]
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding your request for speedy deletion of multiple user-talk pages. The thread is "NHRHS2010". Thank you.Miniapolis 16:51, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1. Please check this article. Currently second and third paragraph of 'history' section reads:
"Cars like the customer, but as a result of a contract for the supply of Tiger and has not been signed, but Jordan's Al Dulayle Arab-Jordanian joint venture Advanced Industries of Arabia (AIA, 80% of the shares in BJG) beginning with the June 2005 production of identical armored Nimr in a variety of designs. So Gaza is still hurt - designed and ready for series production car. At GAZ were collected several cars second series - with a different interior and exterior styling. They called GAZ-233034 "Tiger" were presented at the MIMS-2002"
This seems to be really bad english. Cars like customers, or vice versa? How Gaza is related to GAZ Tigr? This article has some issues.
2. It was constructive remark, i just do not know how to use those fancy templates nor i know which one is suitable. Hope you can help me with that. Also, posting a message labelling certain edit as vandalism on a basis of the form only, without checking the validity or reasoning behind the edit seems to go against basic rules such as "assume good faith". You really need to be more, much more friendly toward new users...
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Your editor review[edit]
I have added feedback on your editor review at Wikipedia:Editor review/NHRHS2010 2. You may also be interested to know there is a request for comments on the future of the editor review process at Wikipedia talk:Editor review#RfC: Should we mark WP:ER as historical? and everyone's feedback is welcome. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review[edit]
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 17 March 2014 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Saturday June 21: Wiki Loves Pride[edit]
| Upcoming Saturday event - June 21: Wiki Loves Pride NYC | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join us at Jefferson Market Library for "Wiki Loves Pride", hosted by New York Public Library, Metropolitan New York Library Council, Wikimedia LGBT and Wikimedia New York City, where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on this theme:
| |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Sunday July 6: WikNYC Picnic[edit]
| Sunday July 6: WikNYC Picnic | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" in Central Park, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.
Also, before the picnic, you can join in the Wikimedia NYC chapter's annual meeting.
We hope to see you there!--Pharos (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Nomination of Pelican State Beach for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pelican State Beach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelican State Beach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 14:14, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
[edit]
| Sunday August 17: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the the Wikimedia NYC community for our upcoming wiki-salon and knowledge-sharing workshop on the Upper West Side of Manhattan.
Afterwards at 5pm, we'll walk to a social wiki-dinner together at a neighborhood restaurant (to be decided). We hope to see you there!--Pharos (talk) 15:57, 4 August 2014 (UTC) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Happy 10,000th Edit day[edit]
Hey, I was unable to find or create template for wishing your 10,000th Edit day. I thought words could fill that gap. Happy 10,000th Edit day - Vatsan34 (talk) 18:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
chamone[edit]
HEHE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.160.252.148 (talk) 19:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
[edit]
| Thursday December 4: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the the Wikimedia NYC community for our upcoming wiki-salon and knowledge-sharing workshop in Manhattan's Greenwich Village.
Afterwards at 8pm, we'll walk to a social wiki-dinner together at a neighborhood restaurant (to be decided). We hope to see you there!--Pharos (talk) 07:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)