User talk:Fissionprime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Fissionprime, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011[edit]

Your recent edit to the page Sleazy (Kesha song) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. 'Please do not change content without a supporting high quality reliable source; the lyric change you implemented is not supported by the given source, please do not do it again. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 01:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lakeshade; I think it is quite possible that the source in question (Vena) is mistaken regarding the song's lyrics. Perusing online, I haven't been able to find any other evidence of the lyrics excluding the word 'technique'. While this is a concern to bring up on the talk page, I think it is safe to presume Fissionprime's edit was made in good faith. Your thoughts? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:45, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately the author has made a mistake in the lyrics, but we cannot change the lyrics or it is a violation of WP:OR which violate WP:GA policy which all her articles are (or will be soon). You're an admin and know Wikipedia is written based on what can be sourced, not truth. I never disputed that the corrections where made in goodfaith, but they were still incorrect (which is why level 1 was issued) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 03:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Undoubtedly! But as you know, we take great care in cordiality towards our newcomers, and so I must confide that the bolded statement trailing your notice reads rather harshly (not that this was intentional). Nevertheless, it seems that Fissionprime brings up a query worthy of attention - while the quotation itself shouldn't be altered, identifying it as mistaken is hardly original research, considering the overwhelming amount of evidence. Here is the first place to start. Regards mate, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]