User talk:Finetooth/Archive 11

Talkback

Thank you for the review. I would appreciate you looking over my comments Senra (Talk) 22:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Macaulay

George Macaulay, which you peer reviewed, is at FAC here. Any comments appreciated, but understand cricket fatigue may have set in! For what it's worth, the main cricket points have been ironed out with Yellowmonkey. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the support. We'll make a cricket fan of you yet! --Sarastro1 (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Dispatch

You might be interested in Tony1's comments on the PR Dispatch we wrote here. I have to admit I do not see the problems he does. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

I (hope?) I have completed all the actions as per your review other than the image which I need to research how to fix. I would appreciate you casting a brief glance over what I have done as further resulting comments would be very welcome Senra (Talk) 15:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Grammy Award for Best Disco Recording

Just so you know, since you offered a peer review, I just nominated the article Grammy Award for Best Disco Recording for Good status. Though it is a short article, I think it meets criteria. Anyways, thank you for your help and you are welcome to comment on the nomination if interested. Oh, and thanks again for all of your contributions for the List of parks in Portland--it might be time for a break since the summer weather has fled the Northwest, but hopefully we can get a good group to resume work on the list next spring/summer. --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:40, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Millennium Park

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions. Please post this on your user page

This user helped promote Millennium Park to featured article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

}

Shimer College

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions. Please post this on your user page.

This user helped promote Shimer College to featured article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

}

Juwan Howard

Thanks for your editorial contributions. You may want to post this on your user page somewhere.

This user helped promote Juwan Howard to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:05, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

}

Thank You!

For the thorough review of Eastern chipmunk. I haven't yet started revisions but look forward to dealing with each of your suggestions and recommendations! Thank you! "Keep up the good work!" Susanne2009NYC (talk) 19:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Hyphenated favor

If you have the hyphen script, could you please run it on The Story of Miss Moppet? It is at FAC and hyphens have come up there. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks - someone else has fixed the hyphens. I thought I recalled that you had the script. Travel safely! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 23:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

AMX

Thanks for your time and efforts at AMX, your suggestions were indeed helpful. I fixed what I could but I would appreciate your help on fixing the repetitious material. Would you mind doing a copy edit to help me address this issue? — GabeMc (talk) 19:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

thank you

Thank you for your comments at PR (Navajo Nation). It was helpful, not so much concerning the technicalities (I'm quite aware of sourcing and such), but it re-affirmed my notion that I'll probably have to kill most sections and start from scratch; I guess I needed another pair of eyes to come to the same conclusion. I just couldn't find another more appropriate venue to get someone else's assessment. I did read the statement about "what peer reviewis for", but couldn't find any "lower-level" feedback venue. Does it exist (for a case like this one where the talkpage seems pretty much unused...)? If not, I'll be content with becoming the sole (or main) author of the re-write. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 03:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

PEFO

Thanks for the heads up - I knew you were planning on taking it to FAC, but missed the PR. Sorry. I will be glad to review it, though it may take me a few days. I took a quick look and it seems very good, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Official Scorer PR

		The Guidance Barnstar
		Your suggestions and comments in the PR on official scorer will improve the article. For that, I award you this guidance barnstar. Aaron north (T/C) 02:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

List of US airmail stamps

Thanks for your comments Finetooth. I will be working on these in the next couple weeks as I have time. Nasa-verve (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Pennsylvania Board of Canal Commissioners

You have created many articles on Pennsylvania's canals, and added to many others on the same subject. Starting with White Horse Farm, I started to read about Elijah F. Pennypacker, who was a member of the Pennsylvania Board of Canal Commissioners. Google searches tell me that there is a lot of information about the PA Board of Canal Commissioners, including official records. Would you think that a separate article would be justified, considering the many other politicians on that board, and the many canals built? --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:18, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Klang (Stockhausen) review

Many thanks, Finetooth, for the many helpful suggestions in your review, most of which have now been implemented. I have responded to your seven open questions on the review page, but I would like to ask your advice about one point you raised. You stated, "'Himmelfahrt (Ascension), for organ or synthesizer, soprano, and tenor. 2004–05 (36 mins.). Work number 81. The specified colour is deep violet-blue.' - Although the article seems well-sourced, it's good practice to provide at least one source for every paragraph except, usually, the paragraphs in the lead. Most paragraphs in the article are sourced, but this one isn't". I concede I have been concerned about this. It is not usual in music articles to supply an inline citation to the score of a composition that is the subject of an article or section, at least as far as things like the title of the work, opus number, instrumentation, etc. are concerned. The associated colour, however, is unusual, and so may require a citation (also for the other 20 Hours—or even 23 Hours, since the colours were assigned for the three planned compositions that were never written). However, in the case of the First Hour, this entails citing the cover of the score or the colour wheel published by the composer in at least two different places. Unlike most of the other scores, those for the first four Hours do not include a statement of the standard HKS number in the preface—it is necessary to look at the type on the cover (or consult the colour wheel, which cannot be reproduced anywhere near as accurately as a single HKS colour). Do you think this is a reasonable way to cite a colour, or does this require "expert knowledge" to interpret, in the same way that a traditional musical score with a three-sharp signature requires expert knowledge to determine whether it is in A major or F♯ minor? If you think this may be a problem, do you have any alternative suggestion?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Main page appearance

This appeared on my talk page today. You deserve the honor too for all you hard work... you are the one who got the article to FA status. Thank you for everything you did on the article. Bgwhite (talk) 00:03, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on November 22, 2010. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 22, 2010. If you think that it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, Raul654 (talk · contribs). If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 07:01, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

The Jordan River is a stream, about 51 miles (82 km) long, in the U.S. state of Utah. Regulated by pumps at its headwaters at Utah Lake, it flows northward through the Salt Lake Valley and empties into the Great Salt Lake. Four of Utah's five largest cities—Salt Lake City, West Valley City, West Jordan and Sandy—border the river. More than a million people live in the Jordan Subbasin, which is the part of the Jordan River watershed that lies within Salt Lake and Davis counties. During the Pleistocene, the area was part of Lake Bonneville. Members of the Desert Archaic Culture were the earliest known inhabitants of the region; an archaeological site found along the river dates back 3,000 years. Mormon pioneers led by Brigham Young were the first European-American settlers, arriving in July 1847 and establishing farms and settlements along the river and its tributaries. The growing population, needing water for drinking, irrigation, and industrial use in an arid climate, dug ditches and canals, built dams, and installed pumps to create a highly regulated river. (more...)

Congrats! LittleMountain5 02:56, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

I have to personally thank you again for the article you found while researching the Petitcodiac River. An extremely useful Government of New Brunswick publication I had overlooked used it as a source and, as a result, I am now able to drastically expand the Geology and Wildlife sections, create a new Recreation section, and add little bits to the Watershed section. I know that the nomination is hard to support at this stage, but it's this type of help that really gives nominators the necessary boost to bump such a nomination to get a feasible chance at a promotion. Keep it up, and thanks. _EricLeb⁰¹ (Page | Talk) 03:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Peer review thanks

Thanks very much for your helpful comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Poulton-le-Fylde/archive1. As always, you've provided a thorough & detailed review, and it is much appreciated! --BelovedFreak 10:19, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations!

I just saw that Petrified Forest National Park earned its well-deserved FA star - congrats! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Glad to help. I plan to try and do such spot checks in FACs and PRs from now on. There is a a proposal here User:SandyGeorgia/IPTemp you might be interested in. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Good job! Dincher (talk) 04:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

My congrats, as well. A truly well-crafted article and a real pleasure to read. --Nasty Housecat (talk) 03:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

I just came to post exactly what Ruhrfisch said, so ditto! --Another Believer _(Talk) 06:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Clemuel

Thanks very much - I was also quite pleasantly surprised when Raul picked it. There was not much notice, but it was still in pretty good shape. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

.hack FAC

As the one who peer reviewed this article a few months back, perhaps you'd be interested in taking a look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/.hack (video game series)/archive2? Thank you in advance, Axem Titanium (talk) 03:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, thanks for your previous help. If you happen to notice any prose troubles, you're welcome to comment. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Silver Reef, Utah

Hello. A while ago, you reviewed the article Silver Reef, Utah, giving suggestions on how to improve it before a GAN is attempted. A user has nominated the article, but I'm certain that the article isn't ready yet. You mentioned in your review that a few of the sources aren't reliable. I haven't gotten to fixing that yet. Is there a way I can put the nomination on hold so I can work on the article? Thanks, The Utahraptor^Talk/_Contribs 22:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi The Utahraptor. I think the only way is to convince the nominator to defer to your wishes. I posted a note about this just now to the Silver Reef talk page. I hope this helps. Finetooth (talk) 23:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

They still aren't withdrawing the nomination. Would you mind reviewing it so I know exactly what needs to be done? The Utahraptor^Talk/_Contribs 19:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Warren County, Indiana

Greetings! I've requested a peer review of the Warren County, Indiana article, and I saw your name on the list of volunteers for geography-related articles, so I wondered if you would have any interest in providing input on this article. We've spent a lot of time improving it, but there may well be some issues that need to be resolved. Thanks for your consideration. Omnedon (talk) 03:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your review of this article, which seemed very thorough; I've begun addressing the points you raised, and I very much appreciate your time and effort on this. I'll continue to update the PR page as work progresses. Omnedon (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

This is my first time through a peer review, and I was wondering if you would have any further comment on the article, or if I need another reviewer to look at the article, and how this process gets completed. I did ask a couple of other editors if they'd review the article as well, but that hasn't happened yet. Most of the issues you identified have been addressed; there are still a couple of areas that we are fleshing out which require some research, but we expect to have that done soon. Thanks for any advice you can give. Omnedon (talk) 20:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge

Well done! I look forward to reading your next FA! --Another Believer _(Talk) 03:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Evelyn Waugh: sources

I was very grateful for your support at FAC, and the nom looks in pretty good shape. Could I ask you, when you have time, to briefly revisit the FAC page and review the sources? It seems I am the only editor currently doing FAC sources reviews, so unless someone steps in, this aspect of the Waugh article may remain unreviewed! I don't anticipate any sources issues arising. I have asked Ruhrfisch if he would look at the images, another area in which FAC reviewing is somewhat uncertain at present. Where have all the flowers gone? Brianboulton (talk) 16:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Peer review of Malmö FF

Hi, would you help me by contributing to the peer review of Malmö FF, Wikipedia:Peer review/Malmö FF/archive1? I nominated it on December 9th and would really appreciate some comments by anyone. I've noticed that you have contributed to a lot of featured articles which is my goal for the article. Therefore your comments and opinion would mean a lot of if you have the time. Thank you! --Reckless182 (talk) 06:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for replying! I've been working on the article for a long while and I'm looking forward to hear your opinion. --Reckless182 (talk) 18:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi, thank you again for your very useful peer review of Malmö FF, its been very helpful. I've considered and acted on your suggestions and I think the article has been very much improved by these steps. The only things I am in doubt over is the image licenses and sourcing. I've tried to clarified license verification on every image desription page and I hope it is enough, would you take a few minutes to look them over? I've also improved sourcing from 28 footnotes to over 60. Every paragraph now has a source, I im fairly certain that this is OK. Thank you again for your kind help!--Reckless182 (talk) 22:38, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I'm just writing to let you know that I've now closed the peer review since all of your suggestions + copyediting have been completed. I will nominate the article for GA status shortly. Thank you for your help!--Reckless182 (talk) 23:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Balloon}} to your friends' talk pages.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Pilot (Desperate Housewives) review

I want to extend my sincerest apologies for how late this is, but thank you so much for your comments on the Pilot (Desperate Housewives) article. I found them incredibly helpful and I genuinely think the article has improved because of your comments. Thanks again! Akcvtt (talk) 02:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Finetooth, Thank you for your comments. As I can see you are an autopatrolled user and have contributed to many GAs. So I was wondering If you could help more. *** in fact *** (contact) 09:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you so much for your very helpful observations! I loved writing the analysis section (partially because the themes of guilt, grief and redemption make up the core of Silent Hill 2) and so I'm very happy that someone else enjoyed reading it too. However, I would like to point out that in the film, Pyramid Head is definitely male. Sorry about that. Have a lovely Christmas, Hanukkah, Winter Solstice, Kwanzaa or whichever holiday you celebrate at the end of the year! Kaguya-chan (talk) 16:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit request

Hi Finetooth, I'd like to request that you copyedit a GAN I've been working on, Washington State Route 11. Its in rough shape, so it may take some time and I'm willing to wait as long as needed. Thanks. –CG^Talk 04:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

The Utahraptor^Talk/_Contribs has given you a Christmas tree! Christmas trees promote WikiLove and are a great way to spread holiday cheer. Merry Christmas!

Spread the WikiLove by adding {{subst:User:The Utahraptor/Christmas tree}} to any editor's talk page with a friendly message.

--The Utahraptor^Talk/_Contribs 02:48, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Led Zeppelin discography

extract from Wikipedia:Peer review/Led Zeppelin discography/archive1:

References

• Can the double-nesting of parentheses in some of the citations, like citation 3, be eliminated?
  • I don't know exactly what you mean. But I think you meant the brackets in the allmusic refs should be deleted.

Is it correct? Regards.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!

	<font=3> Merry Christmas / Happy Holidays, Happy New Year, and all the best in 2011! Yours,Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:52, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too! Dincher (talk) 19:34, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Jivesh seeking your help

Hi, i am Jivesh from Mauritius. I usually edit Beyonce related articles in Wikipedia. I am currently working on Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It) since three weeks. It took me a lot of time and research to expand the article. I will take it to FA soon. Actually, i saw your peer review of "Bad Romance" and it is just flawless. May I tell you that you did an amazing job. I will be very happy if you could do the same for me for "Single Ladies". I will sincerely be very happy and grateful to you. Please, if you have time, I kindly request you to spare some for me and help me. Please. Jivesh • Talk2Me 06:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you anyway Finetooth. I will open a second PR soon. Please lend me a helping hand then. Whatever kind words i said, i really meant it. Thank you. Happy New Year 2011 and may this new year brings infinite positive changes in your life. See you very soon. Take care. Jivesh • Talk2Me 04:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

IRAN

Hi and HAPPY NEW YEAR. Best wishes for you and all your family.

There is a discussion here. We need your help. Thanks. *** in fact *** (contact) 06:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hello Finetooth! If you don't mind, can you do a Peer Review of Why Does It Hurt So Bad. The article is short, so it won't take too long. Thanks. Novice7 | Talk 17:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you :) Novice7 | Talk 04:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the amazing review!!! I've addressed the issues or suggestions. Novice7 | Talk 16:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank You!

Thank you for your comments on the peer review for "Remember Paul?". I found them to be very helpful for the article and in my understanding for what to look for while doing a peer review. Thanks again! Akcvtt (talk) 21:01, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

South Park (season 13)

Hey Finetooth. I'm coming to you because you've always been extremely helpful in peer reviewing articles. South Park (season 13) has currently been nominated for featured article. However, there have been disputes recently regarding the use of the infobox image. The article itself has been well-reviewed, and literally no other actionable concerns have been addressed about it, but unfortunately the image issue has largely overtaken the FAC discussion. I very badly need people to review the entire FA criteria of the episode, not simply the image. At the suggestion of the FA delegate, I'm seeking people to weigh in on the entire criteria, and was hoping you would take a look? Much appreciated in advance. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 02:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

• Much, much appreciated, Finetooth! — Hunter Kahn 04:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review

Just a quick, and a little late, thank you for your peer review of Richie McCaw. Your comments were extremely helpful. AIRcorn (talk) 10:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		Because with these comments, it's like the third, fourth or fifth time you help me improving an article, but unlike the previous PRs, in which I could change things in the respective articles, you are giving me a different point of view of what I believe a FAC is, and how I can handle them. Thank you Tbhotch™ © Happy New Year 07:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

In name of all users which you have reviewed at peer review, your comments are really much more important than what you think, keep doing it :D. Tbhotch^{™ ©} Happy New Year 07:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Jerusalem Biblical Zoo

Thank you!!! Your username is well-deserved! I appreciate your excellent comments and will try to incorporate your suggestions into the article.

I would be happy to review another article, but I don't think I'll come close to analyzing it the way you did. Is it enough for me to comment on structure, copy-editing, and the like? Yoninah (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Juha Vainio

Hi Finetooth, and thanks again for your helpful comments in the Juha Vainio peer review. You recommended adding translations for the Finnish-language song names, book titles etc. Do you think I should add them in parentheses in the text, as is currently done in the article? I'm concerned the text might get too distracting for the reader if there are a lot of translations in parentheses in the middle of sentences. Translating the song titles seems like a tricky task, by the way, especially since some of the titles that contain wordplays and made-up or obscure words :) Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 14:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Okay, that sounds like a good solution. Thanks again for your help! Jafeluv (talk) 00:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Finetooth/Archive 11! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Davenport, Iowa/archive3

Can you please take a look at and review this? It's been going on for 30+ days, and needs more input. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 18:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Jersey City Armory

Never got to thank you for your help with National Dock Secondary. Have been here and there working on your feedback. Now I come with another request that you comb thru the above. Pieced it together over a few months/days and likely am not seeig all the little mistakes. Much appreciated. Djflem (talk) 15:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Somerset Levels PR

Thanks for agreeing to take on the peer review of the Somerset Levels. I spotted you working in your sandbox & have already taken action on some of your suggestions, which are really helpful.— Rod ^talk 17:29, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Peer review of 2010 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup Final

Hello and thank you for leaving review comments on the peer review page. I've followed up on many of the comments and replied to all of them (sometimes with a question). Please have a look at my replies and provide any followup comments you have. Thanks again for taking the time to jump into this review. It's much appreciated. I have asked some other folks to take a look at it too, but the more eyes I can get to review it before WP:FAC, the better. --SkotyWA^T_C 06:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

One PR per day

I took down two of them. Thank you for the heads up. I didn't know. — Joao10Siamun (talk) 07:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Common Eland

Hi Finetooth! I read your useful suggestions about the common eland article. I think I can answer some of your questions you asked there:

• "A coat of arms is, strictly speaking, a distinctive heraldic design on a cloak used to cover and protect armour, but the term is more broadly applied to mean a full heraldic achievement which consists of a shield and certain accessories."- I've got this santence from Wikipedia's own article Coat of Arms. The sentence is the definition given there.

• For the verifiability, I didn't get much sources-but I'm trying to get more sources.

• Some of the citations are incomplete or malformed. Actually when I was creating the citations, I wasn't well at that. But now I'm able to create such citations. Thanks for your help.

Thanks for all your help. I would try to develop this article. --Sainsf<^> (talk) 15:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Peer review of article RVCE

Hello Finetooth, I really appreciate you reviewing the article RVCE on Dec 23. I found your assessment here very useful, and today, I made many changes to the article, in order to make the article comply to the WP:MOS and of course, with your suggestions in mind all the time. If you can make the time, would you consider taking another look at the article, and point out if it is better, or worse, or just the same.

Here are some changes I have done to the article, many of them, as you suggested in your review.

• Improving lead section
• Arranging images so that they don't overlap sections
• standardising the style of writing the date in citations
• fixing some citations
• adding more citations
• introducing more relevant sections
• adding more images
• removing bulleted lists in many places

I have thoroughly gone through Wikipedia:College_and_university_article_guidelines, and I think most of the article complies with this. Also, many of the citations are links to the college website itself. The guideline mentions that this is acceptable (the college website has overpuffery in many places, but I have usually taken care to bring out only the facts from that. hope it is acceptable to you).

Also, I had a question regarding sections like "environmental initiatives", and "facilities". In the guideline, it advises us to write about buildings in the campus, and environmental initiatives (if any). I think you will agree with me that for these kinds of sections, articles from third party sources are almost impossible to find (unless it is a very famous building). As of now, in the article, they stand uncited. What is the standard way of dealing with such sections?

Also, in your review, you mentioned the presence of various bulleted lists. I have removed the bulleted lists, and converted them to prose in various places, but in some places like "Departments", I couldn't think of a way to write it in a prose format, chiefly because there are 11 departments, and writing them in a prose format would take up a lot of space.

Looking forward to your comments. Thanks! TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 18:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Bridge TFA

Thanks for watching it and your kind words. I was surprised to see it will be on the Main Page. A quick look shiows that there is at least one dead link (the msnbc.com article on bad bridges by state) that I want to try and find a better ref for. I also want to upbate the National Bridge Inventory data. Only wish is that there were a little more time before the article hits the Main Page. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

BS4U

		WikiProject Ghost towns Barnstar
		Thank you for the reviews, edits and fixes to help Thistle, Utah reach FA status. Dave (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

C. D. Howe article needs a reviewer

Agent finetooth, if you choose to accept this assignment... FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks and Qs

Finetooth, many thanks for your thorough and thoughtful review of Mantra-Rock Dance. I am learning a lot just by reading your comments. I have implemented most of your suggestions except for the ampersand one, as "&" appears to be built into {{harv}} by design. I followed your suggestion regarding the layout and swapped the images throughout the article. Would you mind taking a look at them now and letting me know? As for the link inside a direct quote, can we link the whole direct quote, like this: "Stanley Mouse-inspired"? I could not decide for myself by reading WP:MOSQUOTE. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 08:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for further comments, Finetooth. I think I'll stick with ampersands as using |Bromley and Shinn| in the template requires that this string be used as a tag in the reference cited. Would you mind marking your comments as resolved on the PR page? And do you think the article is ready for GAN now? Cinosaur (talk) 19:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

I thought all it took was {{subst:rc|1=Comments}} to mark all of your comments resolved in one go, and I thought that was required, but never mind. Many thanks again. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 20:35, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough, Finetooth. You've been very helpful and accommodating. Thank you very much. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 21:28, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

You're Invited! Come Celebrate Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary!

<font=3> You're invited to help celebrate Wikipedia's 10th anniversary! Visit this link for details. An informal celebration will take place at the AboutUs office located at 107 SE Washington Street, Suite 520 in Portland on Saturday, January 15, 2011. An Open Space Technology meeting is scheduled from 5pm to 7pm, with a party to follow. Admission is free! --Another Believer (Talk) 17:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy 10th

File:Verre de whisky.jpg

Happy 10th anniversary of Wikipedia!

HeyBzuk (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{subst:User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Bzuk (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Awesome

Your efforts on behalf of the Peer review page during the past few weeks have been truly astonishing. This is to let you know that, since Ealdgyth has returned, more or less, to FAC source reviewing, I don't have to spend so much time there, so I will be able to return to peer reviewing on a much more regular basis - though I don't expect to match your industry! But if you feel like a bit of a break, don't worry, I'll do enough to keep the backlog at bay. I hope you enjoy the party later tonight. Brianboulton (talk) 00:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

I looked at Peer review just before I saw Brian's comment on my watchlist, and was amazed at the number of reviews you had done there. Thanks and I too will try to do more there. Happy Tenth! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you both. I have been on something of a reviewing roll, though a couple of research and writing projects are looking very enticing. I'm glad to hear Ealdgyth is back. Finetooth (talk) 02:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Burger King peer review

Thanks for the help, I needed some fresh eyes on that. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 05:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Wallkill Valley Rail Trail review

Thanks for the help, I believe I've addressed all your issues. Please see my comments on the review for more information about the hiking infobox.
--Gyrobo (talk) 02:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk page templates

First, I must say that I admire your work on many Pennsylvania canal articles, including the Leiper Canal, which was not far from where I live. If you look at the talk page for that article, you will see that I have added two templates, and provided class and importance for all three templates. As you create or update Pennsylvania articles, I would appreciate it if you could do likewise, especially since you know the canal subjects better than I do. My goal is to have no unrated Pittsburgh or Pennsylvania articles. --DThomsen8 (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Lofty Large peer review

Many thanks for the review of this article—all good stuff, and I shall act on it accordingly. As you suggest, I'll have a crack at a couple of peer reviews myself as well. Arthur Holland (talk) 12:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

17 August 2010 Baghdad bombings

Article: 17 August 2010 Baghdad bombings

Yes I did try asking one of the WikiProjects listed on the articles' talkpage just a few minutes ago, because I've totally forgot about this article. Unfortunately silly old me "Peer Review" isn't a place for any feedback on the article to assess it even though it's in that WikiProject. Next time I'll ask my neighbours' American Pitbull dog for an assessment, while the other contributers who tried to help I appreciated their feedback and suggestions. Adamdaley (talk) 07:20, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Petrified Forest National Park - FP nomination

Hi Finetooth, just letting you know that one of your images has been nominated for FP. Currently there are two versions dicussed, and I think your opinion as the author would be valuable. Note that you as author also have the right to vote for the nomination, and that the nomination will close in less than a day. --Elekhh (talk) 01:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

I am not sure if I understand correctly, but if you support the original without the potentially misleading extended caption, please state so, so that the closer can judge accordingly. Elekhh (talk) 05:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Questions about Collaboration of the Week

Hi Finetooth, I am a PhD student from the Carnegie Mellon University. I am interested in the Wikipedia community, especially the mechanism of Collaboration of the Week. I noticed that you have participated in WikiProject Oregon’s collaborations before. Could you please take several minutes to answer five questions if possible? Thanks for your help!

1. How many times (approximately) have you participated in Wikiproject Oregon's Collaboration of the Week?

2. Why did you participate in the Collaboration of the Week?

3. Do you feel you become a better editor through participating in the collaborations? If so, could you provide some examples?

4. How did Collaboration of the Week change your behaviors (if any)? What caused the changes?

5. Are you still participating Wikiproject Oregon's collaboration of the week recently? Why?

You could leave your answers either in your or my talk page if possible. Thanks for your time! We have the same goal to make Wikipedia a better place.

Cheers --Haiyizhu (talk) 21:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Done now

Hi Finetooth, I'm now done with another round of fiddly tweaks to Finnhorse. You can return to your very thorough review work if you want to. Sorry to dive into the middle of your efforts!  :-) Montanabw^(talk) 00:58, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Petrified Forest National Park

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:The PEFO Tepees.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 02:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Wooooo Hooooo! Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

I much prefer the original to the cropped version, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Congrats! Makes me wish I was there. LittleMountain5 03:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the peer review

Thank you so much for reviewing SS Edmund Fitzgerald. Your suggestions were very clear, helpful learning guides that helped improve the article.--Wpwatchdog (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

PR of Robert Rossen

Hi, Finetooth. Thanks for Wikipedia:Peer_review/Robert_Rossen/archive2. I've reviewed all (I think) your comments, have make most of the suggested changes, and have a few responses that I'd like for us to discuss. --Philcha (talk) 16:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Finetooth. I'm going off to WP:GAN now.--Philcha (talk) 09:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)