User talk:Finchwidget

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Finchwidget, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Warren Mott High School have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. John from Idegon (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Warren Mott High School. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 00:12, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Finchwidget, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 02:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references can be easy[edit]

Hello! Here's how to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain the Wikipedia policy of verifiability.

Adding well formatted references is actually quite easy:

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "Cite". Click on it.
Then click on "Templates".
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in as many details as you can. This will add a well formatted reference that is helpful in case the web URL (or "website link") becomes inactive in the future.
Click on Preview when you're done filling out the 'Cite (web/news/book/journal)' to make sure that the reference is correct.
Click on Insert to insert the reference into your editing window content.
Click on Show preview to Preview all your editing changes.

Before clicking on Publish changes, check that a References header ==References== is near the end of the article.
And check that {{Reflist}} is directly underneath that header.

7. Click on Publish changes. ...and you've just added a complete reference to a Wikipedia article.

You can read more about this on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv.
Hope this helps, --John from Idegon (talk) 02:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To use this message, place {{subst:User:Shearonink/ref}} on User:talk pages when needed.

elcome to Wikipedia Finchwidget, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talk page of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.
	Policies, guidelines and peer assistance	Help and Tutorials
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Tutorial. Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	How to start a page. If you want to create a new article
	Style Guide. The complete guide to how articles should look.	Help. The complete help guide
	Copyright. Addressing copyright concerns.	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Your user pages and your sandbox. Editing in your own "personal" space
	Adoption program. Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four tildes (~~~~) or by pressing or in the editing interface toolbox, located just above the editing window (when editing). You won't need to sign your contributions to articles themselves; you only need to when using talk pages. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 02:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC) John from Idegon (talk) 02:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm John from Idegon. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Grand Blanc High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. MHSAA.com still says KLAA, so your change is going to have to have a source, such as a newspaper article. John from Idegon (talk) 03:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yee hah!!![edit]

		The Schools Barnstar
		Great job giving Dakota High School (Michigan) its own home. I'm glad you "jumped the broom" so to speak. Creating your first article is a big step and you should be proud. Thanks for improving the coverage of the great state of Michigan, the only place where you can show someone where you live with palm of your hand. And thanks for your help with shortening the list of missing school articles. John from Idegon (talk) 00:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just reviewed your userpage on WP:NPP. I think we must have met in a previous life or something. Somewhere in my piles of life detrium, I have old Kodachrome slides of myself standing in front of each of the 83 county road commission garages in Michigan. It took many more than one trip though. I think the last one I hit was Sanilac. John from Idegon (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Macomb Area Conference Schools[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Macomb Area Conference Schools, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 344917661X (talk) 01:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Finchwidget! You created a thread called Citing from a Museum at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cros-Lex[edit]

It's hard to see that being a colloquialism when it is the name on the school's website. John from Idegon (talk) 03:52, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point; it really is more of a frequently used abbreviation, so I'll edit it as such. Finchwidget (talk) 13:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Western Peninsula Athletic Conference moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Western Peninsula Athletic Conference, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Finchwidget! You created a thread called On High School Consolidations at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Western Peninsula Athletic Conference has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Western Peninsula Athletic Conference. Thanks! SportingFlyer talk 03:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Western Peninsula Athletic Conference (November 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't think that three mentions in the Mining Gazette constitute in-depth coverage?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Western Peninsula Athletic Conference and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Western Peninsula Athletic Conference, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Finchwidget. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Western Peninsula Athletic Conference[edit]

Hello, Finchwidget. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Western Peninsula Athletic Conference".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 04:47, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed[edit]

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Disambiguation link notification for October 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NCAA Division I FBS football stadiums, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

removing google maps link showing NCAA basketball arenas[edit]

hey! I noticed you removed the link to the google map showing all D1 basketball arenas. what was the reasoning behind that? thanks :) Garrettcarrot12 (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! That link was originally put there by a different user a while ago, I'm not sure when or by who, but it hadn't been updated in a little while, so I decided to take it over. However, I found that I wasn't able to keep all the 360 odd schools updated as consistently as I liked, so I decided to can it thinking no one would notice. Probably a bit selfish of me, in hindsight... if you're the original creator of the map, feel free to put it back up, but otherwise I can give you the link to the map, and you can make a copy of it and put it up again if you're willing to take on the responsibility of keeping it updated. Sorry for the inconvenience, and I'm especially sorry for taking over your work, if you are the original creator! Finchwidget (talk) 20:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UT Dallas on both D-III and D-II in 2024-25?[edit]

I saw you reverting one of my edits on one of the articles, involving UT Dallas. How come they be in TWO divisions within the NCAA? For example, they will remain D-III while transitioning to D-III by fall 2024. Also, in terms of conference affiliations, will they still remain in the American Southwest Conference by then, or will they be an independent (either on D-III or D-II) before joining the Lone Star Conference by fall 2025? jlog3000 (talk) 01:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about reverting without giving a proper heads up, that was my bad. Generally though when a school moves from NAIA or D-III to D-II, they have a three year transitional period, where they spend the first year in their old league while entering Division II as a provisional member... basically a way for the transitioning school to get their affairs in order before moving on, is my understanding of it. Sul Ross State is in the same situation as UT Dallas-- they applied to join the LSC from the American Southwest Conference this year and were approved just recently, so they are now a provisional member of Division II in their first year of the three year process, while officially competing in the ASC for one final year. Then in the 2024-25 season, they will play a full D-II and LSC schedule. This way everyone wins, as the athletic department at the transitioning school have gotten the approval from the higher ups and can use this year to prepare for their move, while their old conference won't have holes to fill in their athletic schedules and can have time to prepare accordingly for the following season.

In terms of conference affiliations, when a transitioning school is in their first year of reclassifying, I've kept them listed as a departing, but still active NAIA or D-III member, as well as a transitioning Division II member and a future member of their new conference, since they will have gotten the approval from the D-II membership council to move. Then when they enter their second year, I remove them from their old NAIA or D-III conference and add them as a member to their new D-II conference, albeit listing them in yellow to indicate they're still reclassifying. Hope this helps! Finchwidget (talk) 01:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then in Sul Ross State's case (who will be a D-II member by fall 2024 and in the LSC), while being a provisional member for D-II, does it make them a full independent within that level or rank, while still being in D-III and in the ASC (or AmSW as I abbreviate it)? jlog3000 (talk) 01:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not as far as I've seen. Another example is Thomas More, who got approved to join D-II last year and just now entered their second provisional year. Last year they were still listed as a future member of the G-MAC as well as a current, but departing member of the Mid-South Conference, which I had no hand in. Then after July, I moved them to be a full but reclassifying member of the G-MAC. I wouldn't label any of the transitioning schools as D-II independents when they're in their first year of transitioning, because as far as I've seen, none of them actually participate in any Division II play in any sports in their first year; they're still fulfilling schedule obligations to their own league and conference. My impression is that they become a Division II member on paper their first year, and then become a D-II member in practice their second. Finchwidget (talk) 01:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Finchwidget. Thank you for your work on 2023 NAIA football season. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hey y'all! I sure hope y'all are havin' a mighty fine day today. I just wanted to say a heartfelt thank you for takin' the time to contribute to Wikipedia by creatin' that there article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Now y'all can rest easy and enjoy the rest of your day, along with your kinfolk! Y'all take care now, ya hear?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NCAA Division II baseball programs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newman University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding colors to athletics articles[edit]

Hello, please be careful when adding colors to athletic articles, or their conferences. I've noticed on a couple of pages, mainly American Athletic Conference and Pac-12 Conference, you used {{CollegePrimaryStyle|team}}, however when they display, they are not compliant with MOS:ACCESSIBILITY. Please use {{NCAA color cell|team}} and {{NCAA secondary color cell|team}} in the articles so that they are compliant (this template automatically adjusts the font color to comply). If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, Corky 00:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it removes the border which isn't needed. {{CollegePrimaryStyle|team}} should primarily be used for navbox templates (i.e. Template:Michigan Wolverines football). Corky 00:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]