User talk:Fephisto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Fephisto

Thank you for creating Section 609.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Elifism" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Elifism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 24#Elifism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation for your NATO edits[edit]

Hey Fephisto,

Just came by to your page to say thanks for your clarification on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization talk page, including the Cuban Missile Crisis and the recent Poland Missile Strike. Keep it up mate.

Happy Holidays, MateoFrayo (talk) 01:32, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Yakhchāl[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Yakhchāl, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got it...? Fephisto (talk) 17:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citations in the lead[edit]

Hello, and thanks for addressing the [citation needed] tag on Night of the Living Dead. I'm responding here to a question you posed in your edit summary: "Including citation near the top instead of just eliminating citation needed and shoving a comment in the edit history where nobody can see it. This is on the front page of Wikipedia atm, so it'd be nice for folks to more conveniently see where this is sourced from. Also, aren't citations supposed to be right next to the claim instead of buried in a subsection?"

Citations in the lead aren't typically required by Wikipedia policies or guidelines because the top (lead) section is meant to summarize the rest of the cited content. Per WP:WHENNOTCITE, "Citations are often omitted from the lead section of an article, insofar as the lead summarizes information for which sources are given later in the article, although quotations and controversial statements, particularly if about living persons, should be supported by citations even in the lead." Happy Halloween, Rjjiii (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Fephisto (talk) 15:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]