User talk:Fejesjoco
Speedy deletion nominations[edit]
Please do not nominate pages for speedy deletion unless they meet the criteria for speedy deletion. A lack of citations is not a reason for speedy deletion. (You can try to ask for deletion via WP:PROD or WP:AFD in such cases). —Kusma (talk) 10:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps I didn't elaborate sufficiently in my changelog message, please ignore that and refer to the A7 criteria itself. I do believe that (at least several of) those articles meet the criteria for speedy deletion A7, not only because they are unsourced, but because they are not notable enough, and couldn't even be sourced if we wanted to. Anyway, let's continue in Talk:Marti_Group. Fejesjoco (talk) 11:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- A7 is not for articles about topics that are not notable, it is only for articles that do not even credibly claim notability. Major companies that are involved in major construction projects may or may not be able to be sourced properly; this is a question that goes beyond the capabilities of a single administrator to decide, so deletion should only happen after a discussion at WP:AFD. —Kusma (talk) 11:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Marti Group for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marti Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.