User talk:FOARP/Archives/2022/July
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 9, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 11:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for your recent creation. Would you please replace "Kersten" (misspelled) with her correct name? In Wikipedia articles, we also avoid using first names only. I suggest you use "Bernadotte" or "Kerstin Bernadotte" rather than just her first name. I am going to make a change re: their titles from Luxembourg, which you will better understand if you read Prince Bernadotte. Thank you again & best wishes, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the pointers SergeWoodzing. I often find it hard to decide what name to use - "Bernadotte" could be misread as a reference to her husband, whereas "Kersten Bernadotte" ends up a bit over-long and the same effect is achieved simply by using the first name. Not sure if we have a MOS on this but please feel free to post a link if you are aware of one. I've fixed the spelling but please feel free to make any other edits you wish. FOARP (talk) 09:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)