User talk:FFCETT77

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, FFCETT77!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Cassiopeia talk 04:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File source and copyright licensing problem with File:PeterQueally.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:PeterQueally.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Queally (fighter) (April 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Does not appear to meet WP:NMMA.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 07:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, FFCETT77! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 07:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PeterQueally.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:PeterQueally.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.skysports.com/mma/video/33785/12457962/queally-expects-raucous-dublin-reception. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 11:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Queally (fighter) (April 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bsoyka was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The previous reviewer's comments have not been addressed prior to resubmitting this draft. If the issues mentioned are not fixed, the draft will continue to be declined.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bsoyka (talk) 02:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andre Fialho (fighter)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Andre Fialho (fighter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ––FormalDude talk 22:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FormalDude I have not completed editing this page, is this okay? FFCETT77 (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FFCETT77, NO, this is NOT OK. You need to START with content that has reliable secondary sourcing. It's really not difficult: content needs to be verified with reliable secondary sources, so content placed on Wikipedia needs to have secondary sources. Hurry up and get that in there, and do not waste everyone's time with unverified content. Drmies (talk) 22:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@FormalDude @Drmies do I not get time to edit this article before you delete it? I'm not a superhero and I can't make it all in a day, and I haven't submitted it for review or anything. I will add more information and references in due course, but if I could be allowed more time to edit this it would be excellent, thank you FFCETT77 (talk) 22:39, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have already not deleted it, so you are getting time right now. You do not have to make it all in one day: you need to START with material based on reliable sources. No, don't add it "in due course"--start with it. You want to save it, add those references right now, and if that is too much trouble for you, do NOT place these things in mainspace right away. Set them up as a draft. For the sake of redundancy: we are talking about biographies of living people--and the WP:BLP is serious business. Drmies (talk) 22:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies okay thank you I will change it to a draft and I'm adding references as we speak FFCETT77 (talk) 22:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the CSD tag, and chose not to add a BLP PROD deletion tag, thinking you'd be adding such references. What I do not know is how to judge the sourcing, but User:Bsoyka seems to know that better than me and might have an opinion. Drmies (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies thank you. By the way, do you know how to transfer an article from a non-draft to a draft so that I can edit it without it being visible to everyone on the mainspace? A little unsure thanks FFCETT77 (talk) 22:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing--it's done. Happy editing. But if you keep in mind that it all starts with secondary sources, you will not easily run into the buzzsaw of speedy deletion. Take care, Drmies (talk) 23:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@@drmies thanks a ton, hopefully will work smoothly from now on FFCETT77 (talk) 23:04, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No opinion on this one. The previous draft mentioned on this talk page is more clearly notable with reliable news articles, but I'm less sure about this one. Bsoyka (talk) 23:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Don’t worry about it man I hadn’t finished with the article (and Fialho hasn’t had 3 UFC fights so I don’t expect it to be accepted before he fights again). I will definitely add far more references and information before considering submitting properly. FFCETT77 (talk) 23:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zarah Fairn (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HeinzMaster was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
HeinzMaster (talk) 13:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MMA related articles[edit]

Greetings. Since you have edited a number of pages of MMA related articles in Wikipedia, pls see the below info so you may understand how things work here.

  1. Pls visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts and read through the MMA Wikipedia guidelines.
  2. When a bout is announced which stating "finalizing, in work, rumors, verbally agreed,  in the press, this means the bout is not official yet. Wait until it official before place it under the "Announced bouts" section of the event page.
  3. When a bout is announced in the press, editors put the match up in the  "Announced bouts" section (inline citation is needed)
  4. When UFC.com / its local web site (pls check the reference beneath the fight card table in the Wikipedia page), the editors would remove the bout in the "Announced bouts" and place it in the "fight card" section.
  5. When a fighter pulls from a fight (due to injury/or by UFC/ visa issues and etc), we placed the info in the "Background section" (inline citation needed) and remove the injured fighter name and put "TBD".
  6. When a injured fighter has been replaced, editor put the info in the background section (with inline citation). If the new match up has not been shown in the UFC.com fight card, then we will removed the match up from the fight card and place it back to "Announced section". If the match up already shown in the UFC.com then jut put the replacement fighter in the fight card section.
  7. When the event named has been announced (such as UFC Fight Night: dos Santos vs. Tuivasa) then we place the info in the background section (with inline citation). If UFC.com has shown the event names (Fight Night events or UFC on ESPN) such as UFC Fight Night: Cowboy vs. Medeiros or UFC on ESPN: Reyes vs. Weidman, then editor would move the article and article talk page name accordingly and not before, except the flagship event such as UFC 187, UFC 242 and etc.
  8. No colour box in the fighter's page infobox at event fight card page. No title eliminator in the fight card or body text in fighter page or event page. No (c) - champion on the event fight card unless the fighter is the current champion of the weight division.
  9. "method" in the fight table is as per Sherdog.com as per WP:MMA guideline and please do not interpret the method yourself even if the method is incorrect as Wikipedia is all about WP:verification and not the true.
  10. Info box as per Sherdog. No other nick names or else we would have many nicknames pop up every time there is a internet meme.
  11. Reach as per UFC.com or Tapology as Sherdog dont have the info. Pls provide inline citation.
  12. Stand - need to provide inline citation. IF you can find source to support it, leave it blank
  13. Style - "The style parameter should only be used in MMA fighters that have participated professionally or in international competitions in other combat sports (i.e. boxing or kickboxing) and who are notable in said sports and deserve an article for their merits in these other sports (i.e. Antônio Rogério Nogueira, Alistair Overeem). It is suggested to MMA editors that they actively remove the style parameter in infoboxes of MMA fighters that do not meet these criteria." Leave style for modern mma fighter as they have to train several combat disciplines.
  14. No Flag icon on info box or fight table.
  15. Info could be obtain from Sherdog on Info box - need to support by sources such as teachers, belts, notable relatives, university, occupation outside fighting career and etc.
  16. Pls read referencing to understand about referencing and how to provide inline citation.
  17. Leave a brief edit summary before saving you edit, so other editors know the nature of your edit for Wikipedia is the collaboration work from many editors.
  18. To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Ping|Cassiopeia}}. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).
  19. I have sent you the welcome message, kindly register and read through links. Thank you.


Cassiopeia talk 04:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cassiopeia:
Thank you for this, I’m much more clear on what is required now. Keep up the good work.
(FFCETT77 (talk) 12:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC))[reply]


Welcome FFCETT77. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 22:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Fialho (fighter) (April 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cassiopeia was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Subject needs to have at least 3 fighters under top tier promotion (UFC) to pass NMMA notability guidelines. Currently, the subject has only two fights
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Cassiopeia talk 04:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Fialho has been accepted[edit]

André Fialho, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HeinzMaster (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Mobile (May 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deepfriedokra was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
--Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Movsar Evloev into Draft:Aliaskhab Khizriev. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry for the confusion, I don’t intend to keep the text which originally came from the Evloev page in the Draft:Aliaskhab Khizriev page, I just inserted it so I could use the techniques and change the text, as it makes the format easier. Is this not okay? I’m changing everything too it’s not like I’m keeping the text and changing one or two words. I’m quite busy right now I’ve got exams every day this week, so I was just wondering if this was okay, because I don’t have loads of time to edit and nobody has ever said anything before to me.
Thanks for letting me know.
(FFCETT77 (talk) 16:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Stuart Coetzer[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Stuart Coetzer. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. WP:GNG needs to be meet to be notable. WikiVirusC(talk) 19:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Didn’t Happen of the Year Awards moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Didn’t Happen of the Year Awards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have just seen that you placed this article into draftspace because of a lack of citations from verifiable sources. If it is okay, please could you expand upon this as I am unsure of which areas require more sources, if any. Is the issue with the opening paragraph? Or something else? Because there are lots of references which I assumed were useful. Thanks for the help (FFCETT77 (talk) 15:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leah Letson has been accepted[edit]

Leah Letson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lewolka (talk) 10:52, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Didn’t Happen of the Year Awards (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alexandermcnabb was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sourcing is problematic - passing mentions, blogs and deprecated media form the basis for this article, which therefore doesn't pass the General Notability Guideline - WP:GNG or the subject specific guideline, WP:WEBNOTE. Despite the addition of six sources, there's no fundamental change in notability taken place since the article was sent to draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:T.J. Laramie[edit]

Information icon Hello, FFCETT77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:T.J. Laramie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Albert Duraev[edit]

Information icon Hello, FFCETT77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Albert Duraev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bryan Battle has been accepted[edit]

Bryan Battle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Takekubo (talk) 06:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aliaskhab Khizriev[edit]

Information icon Hello, FFCETT77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aliaskhab Khizriev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:T.J. Laramie[edit]

Hello, FFCETT77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "T.J. Laramie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aliaskhab Khizriev[edit]

Hello, FFCETT77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aliaskhab Khizriev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:25, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Didn’t Happen of the Year Awards[edit]

Information icon Hello, FFCETT77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Didn’t Happen of the Year Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi FFCETT77! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:27, Thursday, September 28, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi FFCETT77! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:28, Thursday, September 28, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Your submission at Articles for creation: Istela Nunes (November 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't seem to meet WP:MMABIO, largely cited to fight reports and MMA fan sites
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sionk (talk) 23:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Trevor Peek[edit]

Information icon Hello, FFCETT77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Trevor Peek, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Trevor Peek[edit]

Hello, FFCETT77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trevor Peek".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Albert Duraev[edit]

Hello, FFCETT77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Albert Duraev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Lloyd (footballer) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Ben Lloyd (footballer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Authors request!. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FFCETT77&oldid=1218558398"