User talk:FCBWanderer

Rüdiger

He played in 14-15, so the end date can not be 13. Kante4 (talk) 14:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

But we list the time he was playing with one team and as he played 1 game in 14-15 the Stuttgart II time should end in 15. Kante4 (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

I disagree as the spell is closed but he appeared afterwards which makes not much sense. And since you inserted something i reverted and we agree to disagree, we should ask the footy project for input. Kante4 (talk) 18:39, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mesut Özil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberliga. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Reinildo Mandava article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 22:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Gavi (footballer), you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Li Weifeng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Football manager.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

List of best-selling manga

Why you changed the Dragon Ball sales? There was written "300 million copies". I mean, even in the Dragon Ball article here on Wikipedia it's clearly written "The manga's 42 collected tankōbon volumes have over 160 million copies sold in Japan and 350 million copies sold worldwide, making it one of the best-selling manga series" with many sources to prove it. C'mon, at least just write "300 million copies". A bit of consistency. Fleyzk (talk) 12:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

2005 Supercopa de España

Hi FCBWanderer, just wanted to let you know that before including the 2005 Supercopa de España in the Messi article, you should try to discuss it at the Wikipedia talk:FOOTY since there is already a WP:Consensus about it. Just my two cents. Thanks Bocafan76 (talk) 02:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Spanish Sahara, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 23:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

@M.Bitton: Perfect, I have put the reason now. --FCBWanderer (talk) 23:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

I didn't ask you to put any BS and call it a day. The so-called reason that you left in the edit summary is not a valid one. M.Bitton (talk) 23:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

@M.Bitton: Why not? Is not correct to say that "Spanish West Africa" (what btw is just the name for the Spanish colonies in Africa), is the precedent of the Spanish Sahara. If you studied the history of the region, you should know that those tribes populated the WS for centuries, as is established on the History section of the article. If you do not give any historical reasons to contradict this, I will put back my edit. --FCBWanderer (talk) 00:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello, I'm Arms & Hearts. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Trumpism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello, I'm Vacant0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Serbia Against Violence (coalition), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 06:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 17:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 13:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Nswix (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alba García Martín, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Podemos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Elkarrekin Podemos

I don't know what are you doing. You are using election day to undo accepted versions without justification and without any arguments other than a name maintainment (which was already discussed weeks ago!). Both Podemos-AV and Sumar have been treated by the media and electoral authorities as Elkarrekin Podemos's successors, with both inheriting its electoral rights (and even both participating in debates with equal rights because of that). If Podemos-AV was a mere continuation of the alliance, then Sumar wouldn't have been allowed in. The same has happened in opinion polls and other electoral info.

Elkarrekin as such was mainly a Podemos-IU coalition (together with others), and IU left. Now it is just a Podemos-AV alliance, similar to the ones set in place in multiple other regions in 2023 and 2024 (yet you want for it to use a different colour and article). Merely retaining the name (which has not been the case the acronym, btw) and re-using part of the logo (which, btw, is brand new) doesn't mean a continuation, as there are multiple examples of political entities using similar names to other ones but being different entities. Further, it is not that you have brought new evidence around here, you just came taking advantage of election day to impose your edits unilaterally, then accuse me of being me the one making changes without justification. I cannot comprehend this, and I really seek to assume good faith despite the looks of it, so I'm open to talk (but avoid disruption during election day, please). Impru20^talk 17:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Impru20 @FCBWanderer, I'd like to enter the discussion (despite being a bit late). I think Elkarrekin Podemos exists indeed as a coalition. I reckon that the essence of a coalition is not only its members, but also its name and maintaining a continuity. In this case, the name has been maintained and one of the three original has remained (Podemos) with an additional party (AV). You've pointed out that the equal treatment that Sumar and Podemos have received means that Elkarrekin has been dissolved. As a counterpoint I must say that in 2020 Equo left the alliance and inherited the same electoral rights as Elkarrekin. Moreover, the current coalition has used the same naming formula (Elkarrekin member parties) as in 2020 and the same logo as in 2023.

I'd like also to put as an example Euskal Herritarrok (a coalition of Herri Batasuna and Zutik), which preserved the name despite Zutik leaving the coalition. This has also been the case in many Israeli coalitions (Yamina or Blue & White). To finish I must point out that however the dispute is settled we must change the difference that appears between the infobox and the results section:

2020 United We Can–United Left (Podemos/Ahal Dugu, Ezker Anitza–IU) // Infobox: Elkarrekin Podemos–IU

2024 United We Can–Green Alliance (Podemos/Ahal Dugu, AV) // Infobox: Podemos–AV

Cheers! Basque mapping (talk) 19:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Oh yes, I'm not questioning that the current "Elkarrekin Podemos" exists as an alliance, but it is not the Elkarrekin Podemos that is depicted in the article (which is established as a Podemos–IU alliance, even using the Unidas Podemos colours), but a mere Podemos–AV alliance as it was established for Galicia 2024 or Aragon 2023, for example. It just maintains the "Elkarrekin" brand, but it has even changed its acronym to Podemos–AV, so it makes no sense to depict in in a different way as other Podemos–AV alliances. Impru20^talk 19:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

I agree with @Basque mapping, Sumar members have even filed a lawsuit against Podemos for using the Elkarrekin label, but justice has stated that there is nothing illegal in Podemos mantaining the logo and the name. But whatever, it has no use likewise. FCBWanderer (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)