Not that I disagree with the edit, but a bit harsh, no? [1] -- Khazar2 (talk) 08:28, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I should probably have semi-protected the page also, "harsh" or not. – ExTechOp (talk) 08:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Semiprotection seems to me an excessive reaction to one bad IP edit, but you're welcome to request it if you like. Khazar2 (talk) 09:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not just because of this one edit, I'm sure the article will soon gather quite many further bad edits. – ExTechOp (talk) 11:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My experience has generally been that admins will only protect an article in the face of demonstrated persistent vandalism, which we've been lucky enough to avoid so far. (Ironically, unlike the painting itself). But I'll help keep an eye on it, too. Khazar2 (talk) 16:58, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
