User talk:Emces2015

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2015[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Celia (telenovela), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Philip J Fry / talk 03:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please I'd like that my edits were respected[edit]

I edit the Celia (telenovela) page, first presenting to Celia as she is and also based on what in the novel you see but my edits are being reversed by someone who don't give reasons neither arguments why do it.Emces2015 (talk) 05:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Como veo que hablas español, te pediré que por favor no insistas en añadir este tipo de información, tantos elogios son innecesarios, además insistes en añadir información sin fuentes confiables. La telenovela no está basada totalmente en la vida de Celia Cruz, solo en algunos momentos de su vida. Todos esos reconocimientos ya están en el artículo de la cantante, no es necesarios tantos elogios.--Philip J Fry / talk 13:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

¡¿¡¿¡Que tantos elogios son innecesarios!?!?? tu eres tonto o estas pasando el curso para graduarte de tonto[edit]

hágame el favor y no insista usted en revertir mis elogios que no son innecesarios, si tus los consideras innecesarios se nota que ni imaginas lo que significa Celia Cruz, ningún elogio es TANTO o MUCHO para ella. Si no te gusta Celia no leas mas artículos sobre ella, ella es la mas grande la mas importante pero tampoco fue ni es moneda de oro, la mayoría la quiso y aun la queremos sin embargo hay un grupo reducido de personas que no les llamó la atención o les molestó su desempeño o tanto privilegio que recibió. La novela se trata de su vida, el hilo conductor es su vida aunque como se anuncia en cada capitulo hay personajes pasajes y anécdotas ficticias o modificada producto de incentivos para atractivo novelisticos. Yo voy a seguir insistiendo en poner eso que escribo y te agradecería que te dediques a observar la gente o los artistas que te gustan y no los que no te gustan. Nada de lo que yo he escrito en esta pagina es incierto pues Celia es realmente el icono mas importante de la música latina es lo mas trascendental y muestra de ello son los múltiples homenajes y la evidente vigencia de su esencia en las nuevas generacionesEmces2015 (talk) 21:53, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Emces2015 reported by User:Philip J Fry (Result: ). Thank you. Philip J Fry / talk 02:10, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:40, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Celia (telenovela)[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emces2015 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

my edits in Celia (telenovela) aren't inappropriate or questionable all I've added to the page only makes lives up to the truth, for example in the page where it said -IS BASED ON THE LIFE OF CUBAN SINGER CELIA CRUZ-, I change it to -IS BASED ON THE LIFE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT AND INFLUENTIAL LATINAMERICAN SINGER CELIA CRUZ-, what I added is easily verifiable in many interviews in different articles from reliable sources on the Internet and testimonies of the art world personalities worldwide.

In the space for the plot of the Celia (telenovela) page, it said only -CELIA TELLS THE STORY AND MUSICAL LEGACY OF A WOMAN WHO BEGAN HER CAREER IN THE MIDST OF THE CUBAN REVOLUTION, DURING A TIME WHERE A FEMALE SINGER HAD NO STAGE-, I change it to -CELIA TELLS THE STORY AND MUSICAL LEGACY OF AN AMAZING WOMAN WHO BEGAN HER EXTRAORDINARY CAREER IN THE MIDST OF THE CUBAN REVOLUTION, DURING A TIME WHERE A FEMALE SINGER HAD NO STAGE. THIS LADY CREATES A REVOLUTION AFTER IMPOSING RESPECT FOR WOMEN IN POPULAR MUSIC; SHE BREAKS THE BARRIERS OF RACISM, SHE TAKES OVER THE WORLD WITH HER POWERFUL VOICE AND HER APPEALING STYLE, BECOMING THE UNIVERSAL ICON OF LATINOS WORLDWIDE-, all which I've added is in short what is shown in the serie however there is a Wikipedia editor who questioned me and reported me as unreliable information inserter. Anyone who has seen the serie, about Celia, knows that what I have written is what is shown in the serie, the Celia Cruz's life is the thread of the plot although certainly there are passages characters or fictional stories that enrich the plot, but it does not mean which I've added to the Celia (telenovela) page, is not the summary of the serie or is something false. In the serie shown as she is an amazing woman and how she began her extraordinary career, her struggle against racism and his triumph by winning as a woman in a musical world where only men was excelled, in the series is also shows how she begins conquering the world with his unique style and powerful voice, reasons that becomes her the legitimate icon of Latinos Worldwide. Just you have to see the novel or its synopsis to verify that my contribution to the Celia (telenovela) page, is completely true and reliable.

I sincerely believe that are being violated, by administrators of Wikipedia, my rights to make contributions to Wikipedia because locked me without analyzing that my contributions are completely truthful. It is painful but true. I would like to unlock me immediately and indicated me how to protect pages of unscrupulous and corrupt editors who just want to encourage unnecessary controversies.Emces2015 (talk) 21:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please read WP:PEACOCK, WP:NPOV, WP:EW, WP:AGF, WP:FANCRUFT, and if you want to spend your time writing in praise of this person please go and do it somewhere else, as Wikipedia is not the place for it. And as for "I sincerely believe that are being violated, by administrators of Wikipedia, my rights to make contributions to Wikipedia...", you do not have any rights to edit Wikipedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

to poor and uncultivated Boing! said Zebedee[edit]

I understand that there is a plot in wikipedia, I see it in this way and it serves me to convey the kind of ilk that have administrators of this site. I have explained a thousand times that I am not praising to anyone but if I were praising to Celia it is something she has more than deserved and it must be mentioned wherever concerning her, but apparently that bothers to several mediocres as some administrators and Wikipedia editors who know well that never going to be praised by anyone. ja ja ja handlers as you, embarrass me, it is really painful but it is the reality of Wikipedia. Emces2015 (talk) 03:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Insulting me (and others) is really not going to help your cause, you do know that don't you? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Boing! said Zebedee. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- GB fan 00:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- GB fan 00:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  -- GB fan 00:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]