User talk:Elmorgan

{{helpme}}

I have a question regarding valid acceptable references and sourcing for new articles.

For technical entries, are articles and reports from industry-leading analysts (such as Gartner, IDC, Forrester Research, etc.) considered valid?

Thanks for your help!

Elmorgan (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

What do you need help with? xenocidic (talk) 17:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Right, sorry, I forgot to check back on you. I think those would probably be valid, yes. See WP:RS for more on what Wikipedia considers a reliable source. Also, don't forget to sign your posts with ~~~~. Cheers, xenocidic (talk) 18:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I figured out who posted it by looking at my talk page history =). See above for your answer. xenocidic (talk) 18:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

As long as the sources are reliable, 3rd party, published documents, you should be ok. I gather the analysts you mention would meet these criteria. xenocidic (talk) 19:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I really appreciate your help.

Elmorgan (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Any time. enjoy the following welcome template, you may find it useful. xenocidic (talk) 18:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Elmorgan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! xenocidic (talk) 18:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Nomination of Managed file transfer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Managed file transfer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Managed file transfer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vectro (talk) 21:52, 10 May 2019 (UTC)