User talk:Eliasrurikid

April 2024[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to History of Hungary, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 15:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to András Hadik. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 15:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elias Rurik's Slovak Republic (April 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eliasrurikid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]