User talk:Elena2341

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Elena2341!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 20:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Risk-based approach in the GDPR (May 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Risk-based approach in the GDPR. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is not clear that the topic is of sufficient notability for a stand alone page. It would, however fit nicely into the General Data Protection Regulation page which may in turn lead to the section being split off into a new page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Risk-based approach in the GDPR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Risk-based approach in the GDPR, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elena2341! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits as minor[edit]

Hi Elena2341! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at General Data Protection Regulation that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --Rocknrollmancer (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can now see that you've copied content from Draft:Risk-based approach in the GDPR which you authored. I'm unsure how this works with a draft, but normally there is a protocol described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Normally, annotation is needed in the edit summary (which you have not completed) and/or the Talk page. I've left notes at both the draft and the article Talk pages.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 21:47, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rocknrollmancer: Hi, they were advised in the topic above to merge this draft into that already existing article. I think that is why they did that. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did see that. Thank you.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Risk-based approach in the GDPR[edit]

Hello, Elena2341. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Risk-based approach in the GDPR, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]