User talk: electricController

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


user | talk | great edits | awards | unusual

navbar stolen rebuilt from Enterprisey's one

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David Gross Clean Autograph.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Atomized, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Halo 5: Guardians[edit]

FYI, I think the GA nomination is a little premature. For a game that received so much coverage, it should be broader in its coverage. The article needs quite a lot work and some copy-editing. It'll fail GA in its current state. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Good Article Nominations Page Needs Your Help![edit]

Good Articles: Music needs the help of willing reviewers!

Hi there. You nominated an article for evaluation against the good article criteria some time ago, but I noticed you have yet to review an article yourself. Although it's not mandatory, it would be helpful if every user who creates a nomination also reviewed at least one other article, as this would help clear the massive backlog. Reviewing someone else's article can also help you in the long run: every article reviewed brings yours one position closer to the top of the nominations list! If you worked on the article you nominated, chances are you're already familiar with the six good article criteria. It really isn't hard to review, and may take an experienced editor only a few hours to complete. If you have the time and would like to help, please click here, take a moment to figure out which article you'd like to review, then click on its (start review) button. Thank you for reading, and if you need assistance with your review at any point, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page and I'll respond to you as soon as I can. Homeostasis07 (talk)

Good job building up The National Anthem article[edit]

Thanks! --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for cleaning up The Velvet Underground & Nico. It would be nice if it became a GA again. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore. It is a wp:self published source. Since this is a long running dispute, any contributor warned by the situation and who doesn't respect it, would encounter sanctions and could be blocked from editing. Thanks. You've been informed because you used this source here. Woovee (talk) 23:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. – electricController 23:28, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thanks for expanding and adding sources to You're Dead!, it's about time that somebody expand the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Velvet Underground & Nico you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Velvet Underground & Nico you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Velvet Underground & Nico for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Discovery (Daft Punk album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha, that's funny...[edit]

First off, thank you for the Half-Million Award for American Idiot, I very much appreciate it. I think it's cool you even noticed my trophy case of sorts. It is quite a prestigious award to me - as far as Wikipedia awards go, haha.

Imagine my surprise, however, when I realized I qualify for a top-tier Million Award for this article I got promoted over a year ago. Then again, I see on the award's page that the person who helped Green Day themselves get promoted waited over three years for that thing. So, sincerely, thank you very much. Danny from IP 104.39.123.142 (talk) 14:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Getz/Gilberto, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Don Payne and The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inserting whitespaces in references[edit]

Hi. I see you've worked on Discovery (Daft Punk album), Richard D James Album and The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars recently. I'm sure many editors thank you for your extensive contributions. However, upon working on those articles, it appears you've used a script to insert whitespaces into references. I don't think this is the preferred layout of referencing for most readers, and it adds unnecessary bytes of data to a page, making it upon editing longer to load and lengthens the page, interrupting the flow of horizontal referencing. Please cite WP:CITEVAR—maintain the original style of citations, even if you prefer another. Thanks. Ss112 13:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: Thank you for warning me. I thought it was better for editing the references later, but since there are issues with it, I will stop using the script (at least, this function). Again, thank you! – electricController 16:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 14:21, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, ElectricController. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kid A[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kid A you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kid A[edit]

The article Kid A you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kid A for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You[edit]

The Music Barnstar
For your work on Discovery. Much appreciated. Freikorp (talk) 12:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Discovery (Daft Punk album)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Discovery (Daft Punk album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 13:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kid A[edit]

The article Kid A you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kid A for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 22:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Discovery (Daft Punk album)[edit]

The article Discovery (Daft Punk album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Discovery (Daft Punk album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deep trance listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deep trance. Since you had some involvement with the Deep trance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:48, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avicii New Logo.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Avicii New Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. hiàn 01:08, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Break Through The Silence EP Cover Art.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Break Through The Silence EP Cover Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, ElectricController. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:The Chainsmokers logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Financial markets content project[edit]

Hello,

My name is Tijana and I am managing a newly established non-profit project called Wikinvesting. Generally, it concerns a knowledge base creation, where everyone will be able to share their knowledge, experience and information related to financial markets. I saw you expressed interest in topics related to it on Wikipedia and I’d love to discuss the project with you further.

If you are interested, please let me know how can I contact you? Cheers,

TijanaRistic (talk) 13:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I personally think it's a good idea to include the DaBaby/Manson controversy in the lead, though I would scrap due to their allegations of homophobia and abuse respectively, which caused the album to receive a zero-star rating from a publication to avoid going into too much detail. It's elaborated on in the critical reception section, which is sufficient in my opinion. What do you think? Throast (talk | contribs) 18:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Throast: I agree that is too long, but I personally think that scrapping the sentence entirely would not give enough context as to why their appearance attracted controversy.
You're right, the last half sentence was pretty much the one I was having an issue with. Throast (talk | contribs) 18:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back[edit]

After seeing you have not edit since 2017, glad to see you back. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Thanks a lot! – electricController 23:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paint.net screenshot.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paint.net screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]