User talk:Elblanco

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Elblanco, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fra nkB 20:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alert: Change in redirect[edit]

Your use on your user page of 'P.C' now links to the majority page: Political Correctness. Since even a Polack as dumb as I am knows that's not quite what you mean, you may want to redirect it using a pipetrick to the Amiga article, or just to the PC disambigulation page. Alas, I fear refering to the 'Good ole' Amiga' is a bit different than the way the rest of us use the term these days. Suggest you delete the periods so the rest of the world will know what you were saying. (I'd do it, but user pages are supposed to be changed only with permission.) If you ever want to join our online community in earnest, I'm on the welcoming committee (WP:WC) and will be glad to lend a hand up the learning curve. Good luck with the music— must have been fun in it's day! Best regards, // FrankB 20:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Xee.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Xee.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alice (programming language)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alice (programming language), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cyclopia ^talk 18:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alice (programming language)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alice (programming language) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cyclopia ^talk 18:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Programming language articles[edit]

Hello - and welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you are repeatedly recreating the articles for the programming languages Alice and Nemerle. Unfortunately, a deletion debate has already taken place for each of these topics and so your recreations will simply be deleted.

However, the deletion of these articles is currently subject to review at deletion review. If you have an opinion on whether the deletions were correct or believe that there are issues that were not considered in the deletion discussions, you can add your thoughts there.

Repeatedly recreating "stubs" will not achieve anything. It's also unwise to refer to good-faith editors as vandals.

If you do choose to comment at the deletion reviews, be aware that comments that are grounded in Wikipedia policy (especially [[WP:GNG|the general notability guideline) will be given greater weight by the closing administrator.

CIreland (talk) 18:38, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing wikipedia by deleting articles on notable programming languages. See discussions about this vandalizing ref:

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alice (programming language)[edit]

Re Alice: Because this article was deleted after a deletion discussion at AFD, just two days ago, it's improper for you to keep reposting it. If you think the AFD decision was incorrect, you can make your case at Wikipedia:Deletion review. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's improper for you to keep deleting it. Stop it, it's vandalism. Elblanco (talk) 18:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing privileges have been suspended for 31 hours[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

31 hour common vandalism block. Things have changed a little since you made a dozen or so edits in 2005 (two thirds of which are deleted) and the four in 2008 - WP:N in now a requirement, and WP:NPA is rather strictly enforced. Lastly, a notice to not recreate a deleted page of one article is regarded as a general notice to not recreate deleted articles - which is the basis under which you are now blocked. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:N is a guideline, not a requirement. If you feel it should be a requirement, edit the guideline page and change it as such. Elblanco (talk) 03:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

God I fucking hate wikipedia. Elblanco (talk) 03:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]