User talk:EWLwiki

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, EWLwiki. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Trevj (talk) 23:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms in order to preserve the slave patrol militias in the southern states[edit]

Tanks for the warm cookie :) Just registered on here tonight after seeing what i'll talk about below. (i'll get this thanks line in the right place sometime lol) anywho on to what motivated me to register tonight...

from the 2nd amendment page, right on the top it says "The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms in order to preserve the slave patrol militias in the southern states"

The reference points to http://truth-out.org/news/item/13890-the-second-amendment-was-ratified-to-preserve-slavery which looks to me to be a progressive blog, making it rather biased, and in my opinion not a good reference for what was added to the top of the page. It has been in the list of reasons farther down the page "suppressing insurrection, allegedly including slave revolts" and i see no reason that alleged reason should be mentioned on the top of the page.

Even in the article you referenced, there is alot of additions of words in []'s, meaning the person that wrote the article, or someone else, took the liberty of adding those bracketed words, and reading it from my unbiased standpoint it seems most all of those bracket additions were put in place to try to make it a fact that the 2nd amendment was created for that purpose, or entirely for that purpose.

They just finished fighting off a tyrannical government that they wanted to get away from. I don't think that alleged reason was first on their minds when they created the 2nd amendment. Granted it is allegedly one of several reasons the 2nd amendment was created, it is not the only reason, and should not have special mention in the beginning of the article that, in the way it is worded there, tries to make it sound like a positive reason and the primary reason the 2nd amendment was created.

That alleged reason has no higher precedence over the other reasons listed lower in the article. The addition of "in order to preserve the slave patrol militias in the southern states" at the beginning of the page should be removed as it is appropriately mentioned with several other reasons in the "Experience in America prior to the U.S. Constitution" section.

XXxDSMer (talk) 07:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Your addition to Qshell has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Do not put the project at risk by introducing copyright violations. You have already been warned about this. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing some of your other contributions, this is also a copyright violation. It appears to have been copied from this webiste. Again, this kind of thing puts Wikipedia at risk. Please review your past contributions and remove all instances in which you have copied text. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not mark major edits as minor[edit]

Hi EWLwiki! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]