User talk:EOA3928

The Funeral Pyre[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 22:15, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ImmersedByTheFlamesOfMankind.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ImmersedByTheFlamesOfMankind.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:OctoberAlbumCover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:OctoberAlbumCover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:45, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NatureOfBetrayalCover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:NatureOfBetrayalCover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 21:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TheConsumationCover2.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TheConsumationCover2.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:28, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of The First Book of the Kings[edit]

A tag has been placed on The First Book of the Kings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ⇔ ∫Æ_S dt @ 00:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FuneralPyreLeechSplit.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FuneralPyreLeechSplit.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DaemonAlbumCover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DaemonAlbumCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling Change on the Hurt page[edit]

The song is literally spelled "Somnambulist" which translates into "Sleepwalker". This information comes from Wil Quiantance and Loren. Sorry, but it will be changed back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Se7ensmatrix1216 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somnambulist[edit]

Yes, this was a spelling mistake on the case, which was verified by Loren. I'll trying to find the post where it talks about that, but I know for a fact that it was a misprint.

To Clarify[edit]

This song was spelled correctly on the original print of the album, but misspelled on the reprint. No need to clarify it. Mark it as a Minor edit and a spelling correction.

Image copyright problem with Image:WoundsCover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:WoundsCover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rapture Single.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rapture Single.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:OctoberAltCover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:OctoberAltCover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I[edit]

Have a look at this discussion. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 21:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in User_talk:Duffbeerforme, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 00:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very strange and apparently misguided warning[edit]

I don't see any diff or even an article related to this warning. However you seem to have some pretty big misunderstandings about Wikipedia policy. WP:Vandalism has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia. Concisely, it is "any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia". I see no evidence of this on the part of Duffbeerforme (talk · contribs) that this warning could be related to.

~~Furthermore,~~ you seem to have no understanding of what a WP:RS is. Forums are generally not reliable sources.

~~You should refrain from issuing any additional warnings to anyone until you fully understand the policies that you are citing. That warning was disruptive.~~ Toddst1 (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about this diff? Or this? That was another user. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 01:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if the question is directed to me or to EOA. If it was me, I was talking about this warning which I could not map to a specific edit that Duffbeerforme (talk · contribs) had made. Usually warnings - especially uw-4's indicate what article or page they are referring to, if not the actual diff so that a potentially blocking admin can take a look. That was not done here. Toddst1 (talk) 01:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a warning, at least no uw-4. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 01:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c)Ah. My mistake. As there are not too many sigs involved, and the warning was inserted in the middle of a comment left by this editor, I was confused. The diff I posted wasn't a uw-4. I have retracted my comments above and will redirect this comment to its rightful owner who also didn't use a sig. Toddst1 (talk) 01:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion / mess[edit]

Hi. First, sorry about the mess above. There was one important part up there though. It's about WP:RS. It doesn't look like you understand that, based on your comments on Talk:The Funeral Pyre and on Duff's talk page. I really suggest you read it. You've also invoked WP:OSE too - which doesn't work either. Please take the time to follow those two links and read what's there. Not understanding them will lead you in to trouble sooner or later. Let me know if I can help. Toddst1 (talk) 04:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My main issue on this, which I'm starting to get grasp on, is that no one is taking into consideration where these Hurt citations lead. Yes they go to the band's forum, which may be considered bias. Very bias. However, this is not always the case. See, a lot of stuff that's cited are interviews conducted by professionals that can't be found online because they get rid of said interviews because they feel like it's taking space on their site. So, we archive these interviews on the forum. One of the interviews, conducted by Michael Shoulders, was a very large contribution to all the Hurt pages. Both the Hurt (Self-Titled) and The Consumation pages were built off this one interview for the sole purpose of having the information on Wikipedia. But since he has no affiliation to a third party site, the only place that would look remotely "citable" was the forum, since, MySpace isn't a very good source of information. Some non third party sources are acceptable according to this, but I do understand that there (definitely) need to be more. Still, bringing this to my attention only shows that I have a lot of work to do.

As for The Funeral Pyre pages, I'm going to look for MANY more third party sources, for the sole reason of keeping my page. I found this page back in April of '08, and have been trying to provide more information on the band. Internet was knocked out for a bit, so I'll just have to work harder. I still feel that this band is rather notable, as they've done a lot of work with many bands, have released two major (indie) label albums, and is working on their next one after summer touring.

Thank you for not automatically trying to delete my page, though. I'm getting sick of people just saying the article isn't good enough and then destroying it. It's rather annoying. EOA3928 (talk) 15:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, WP:RS is a big deal and sometimes tough to satisfy. One of the things that can help you find better sources is try adding {{Findsourcesnotice}} to the talk page of articles you're working on. Good luck and let me know if I can be of further assistance. Toddst1 (talk) 18:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DecemberCover.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:DecemberCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

In a recent edit to the page Tomb Raider III, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 08:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:NatureOfBetrayalCover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:NatureOfBetrayalCover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 07:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ImmersedByTheFlamesOfMankind.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ImmersedByTheFlamesOfMankind.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]