User talk:Draykaay
May 2024[edit]
Wikipedia is not a web host for holding personal web pages unrelated to work on building the encyclopaedia. You are, of course, very welcome to start making contributions to the encyclopaedia, in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, if you are interested in doing so, but if you wish to have a personal web page, then there are many web sites which provide that sort of service, but Wikipedia is not one of them.JBW (talk) 13:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Nyakase. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Portable (musician) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nyakase 15:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:XfD today. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 16:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:XfD today, you may be blocked from editing. Annh07 (talk) 16:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Draykaay[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Draykaay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 14:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draykaay[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draykaay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 12:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Â Bbb23 (talk) 12:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Draykaay (block log ⢠active blocks ⢠global blocks ⢠contribs ⢠deleted contribs ⢠filter log ⢠creation log ⢠change block settings ⢠unblock ⢠checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please I'm sorry, I wasn't trying to promote or go against Wikipedia guidelines please unblock I'm truly sorry please Draykaay (talk) 13:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No response to query below in five days, and in any event just saying you're sorry (even though you may be) isn't enough (If it were nobody would be blocked for very long, and we might as well not block anyone). â Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You won't be unblocked to edit about yourself(please read WP:AUTO), so we will need to know what you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 14:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
I would be glad if you consider it please.
My article merited block because....
Before I start, Please I'm sorry for multiple accounts I created
My first article I wrote on Wikipedia was "Draykaay" which is about my brand but it was deleted and I was blocked because the admin said it was promotional article. I accept my wrongs
The account I created next was "Godsendodile" it was a "sockpupet" of my First account "Draykaay".
The next acc I created was "Draykaayrg" this time around I took time to write the article but it doesn't have good sources and I left it on my Draft: Draykaay. To avoid nothing bad happening to this acc I created another one
Which was mnationonly and was later blocked as a sockpupet to Draykaayrg.
Things I'll do..
I promise you if you give me my last chance by unblocking me on Wikipedia, I promise to read the wiki guidelines before doing anything on Wikipedia
And also I'll contribute positively on Wiki by writing articles I can, which needs to be on Wikipedia and are eligible to be on Wikipedia, Like the way I wrote for an artiste who doesn't have an article on Wiki and I also wrote article about a town.
- Olease follw the instruction sin the block notice to request unblocking. Thanks.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- okay, thanks I'll. Draykaay (talk) 12:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- The edits you made to artists are not good examples of constructive edits. Both your edit to Portable (musician) and Khaid were simply unsourced personal opinions, so both edits were quickly reverted properly and you vandalized the articles for deletion page. I would encourage you, if unblocked, to study more about how Wikipedia's content is sourced and verified before editing again, or you might get blocked again very quickly. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 13:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- okay, thanks I'll. Draykaay (talk) 12:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Draykaay (block log ⢠active blocks ⢠global blocks ⢠contribs ⢠deleted contribs ⢠filter log ⢠creation log ⢠change block settings ⢠unblock ⢠checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As you asked yesterday why was my article merited block.
My article merited block because....
Before I start, Please I'm sorry for multiple accounts I created
My first article I wrote on Wikipedia was "Draykaay" which is about my brand but it was deleted and I was blocked because the admin said it was promotional article. I accept my wrongs
The account I created next was "Godsendodile" it was a "sockpupet" of my First account "Draykaay".
The next acc I created was "Draykaayrg" this time around I took time to write the article but it doesn't have good sources and I left it on my Draft: Draykaay. To avoid nothing bad happening to this acc I created another one
Which was mnationonly and was later blocked as a sockpupet to Draykaayrg.
Things I'll do..
I promise you if you give me my last chance by unblocking me on Wikipedia, I promise to read the wiki guidelines before doing anything on Wikipedia
And also I'll contribute positively on Wiki by writing articles I can, which needs to be on Wikipedia and are eligible to be on Wikipedia, Like the way I wrote for an artiste who doesn't have an article on Wiki and I also wrote article about a town.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I would be glad if you consider it please. As you asked yesterday why was my article merited block. My article merited block because.... Before I start, Please I'm sorry for multiple accounts I created My first article I wrote on Wikipedia was "Draykaay" which is about my brand but it was deleted and I was blocked because the admin said it was promotional article. I accept my wrongs The account I created next was "Godsendodile" it was a "sockpupet" of my First account "Draykaay". The next acc I created was "Draykaayrg" this time around I took time to write the article but it doesn't have good sources and I left it on my Draft: Draykaay. To avoid nothing bad happening to this acc I created another one Which was mnationonly and was later blocked as a sockpupet to Draykaayrg. Things I'll do.. I promise you if you give me my last chance by unblocking me on Wikipedia, I promise to read the wiki guidelines before doing anything on Wikipedia And also I'll contribute positively on Wiki by writing articles I can, which needs to be on Wikipedia and are eligible to be on Wikipedia, Like the way I wrote for an artiste who doesn't have an article on Wiki and I also wrote article about a town. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= I would be glad if you consider it please. As you asked yesterday why was my article merited block. My article merited block because.... Before I start, Please I'm sorry for multiple accounts I created My first article I wrote on Wikipedia was "Draykaay" which is about my brand but it was deleted and I was blocked because the admin said it was promotional article. I accept my wrongs The account I created next was "Godsendodile" it was a "sockpupet" of my First account "Draykaay". The next acc I created was "Draykaayrg" this time around I took time to write the article but it doesn't have good sources and I left it on my Draft: Draykaay. To avoid nothing bad happening to this acc I created another one Which was mnationonly and was later blocked as a sockpupet to Draykaayrg. Things I'll do.. I promise you if you give me my last chance by unblocking me on Wikipedia, I promise to read the wiki guidelines before doing anything on Wikipedia And also I'll contribute positively on Wiki by writing articles I can, which needs to be on Wikipedia and are eligible to be on Wikipedia, Like the way I wrote for an artiste who doesn't have an article on Wiki and I also wrote article about a town. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= I would be glad if you consider it please. As you asked yesterday why was my article merited block. My article merited block because.... Before I start, Please I'm sorry for multiple accounts I created My first article I wrote on Wikipedia was "Draykaay" which is about my brand but it was deleted and I was blocked because the admin said it was promotional article. I accept my wrongs The account I created next was "Godsendodile" it was a "sockpupet" of my First account "Draykaay". The next acc I created was "Draykaayrg" this time around I took time to write the article but it doesn't have good sources and I left it on my Draft: Draykaay. To avoid nothing bad happening to this acc I created another one Which was mnationonly and was later blocked as a sockpupet to Draykaayrg. Things I'll do.. I promise you if you give me my last chance by unblocking me on Wikipedia, I promise to read the wiki guidelines before doing anything on Wikipedia And also I'll contribute positively on Wiki by writing articles I can, which needs to be on Wikipedia and are eligible to be on Wikipedia, Like the way I wrote for an artiste who doesn't have an article on Wiki and I also wrote article about a town. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}