User talk:Donalds

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page

Hi Donalds, I'm considering creation of an external wiki for Shambhala related topics. Would you be interested in participating or offering thoughts on the project? - Owlmonkey (talk) 00:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YesDonalds (talk) 04:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ritrö Gönpo[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ritrö Gönpo, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritrö Gönpo. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fred Talk 18:57, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Lee Watson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dumont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Wayne Lamb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Cole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Kevin Dreyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

For all the great work you did at Kevin Dreyer, I sent you a little friend!

Gtwfan52 (talk) 17:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of South Bend Civic Theatre, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sbct.org/about.php.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 01:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you should not remove the copy violation notice especially if the issues have not been addressed. Persistent template removal will result with a block, please note that Wikipedia can't accept copy and pasted material. Users must write the article themselves, not copy and pasting from a website. I have now changed the article but I wanted to notify you about removing notices. SwisterTwister talk 02:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the problem is this: Articles need sources. The article begins. The bot comes along and recognizes the sources before the article even begins to take shape. It is a very devisive cycle. I don't use the sandbox. Maybe I should. It is not copyright infringement if it is cited. Donalds (talk) 15:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Donalds...It is still a copyvio even cited if it is a near word for word copy. That is what the bot spotted. I do disagree with SwisterTwister tho...by the time you pulled the tag, you had cleared the copyvio (Qualifying that...you still had a word for word copy of the first line, except you added "in Northern Indiana". Still close, but I wouldn't think for one line, it should matter too much, IMHO.) Anyway we are moving on from that and the article is shaping up nicely. I am a former Niles resident and you may recognize my name and its SB connection. Thanks for your good work on articles pertaining to Indiana. I for one appreciate it. BTW, I would thoroughly suggest starting articles in your sandbox. Regards, Gtwfan52 (talk) 00:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mae Faggs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princeton High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kevin Dreyer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Dreyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Dreyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Above[edit]

Hi, Donalds! I just visited the AfD for Kevin Dreyer. I will be supporting the article, but I wanted you to realize a fallacy in your argument. There is absolutely nothing that the subject of any article can do on their own to establish notability. Notability is established by respected sources noticing what the subject of an article has done. It is a difficult concept and one unique to Wikipedia. I think your NY Times review should satisfy the requirement and that is the argument I will make at AfD. You should, however continue to look for other newspaper articles (maybe the Notre Dame campus paper?) and add as many good independent references as you can. Good luck and happy editing. Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BLP=Wikipedia policy on Biographies of Living People. Gtwfan52 (talk) 04:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dance Moms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goodwill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joel Fink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endgame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lord family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Riley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Kay Place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The New Normal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:17, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Donalds. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priscilla Inkpen (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 16:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Donalds, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 16:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priscilla Inkpen (July 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 18:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Donalds. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Donalds. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Donalds. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]