User talk:Dermann69

HI I DELETED ALL YOUR DUMB COMMENTS! YEAH!

Uranus[edit]

This material has been added and deleted before. It has been discussed on the talk page, but I believe it does not belong in the article. It has been noted in Uranus in fiction and culture. I was just reverting like so many before me. I'm sorry for the confusion. You could bring up the topic on the discussion page and tell why you think it should be added, but I'm not sure they will accept it. I hope you understand. Also, the Dole logo on your page needs to be deleted because copyrighted images are not allowed on User pages. Thank you. --Will Mak 050389 01:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OC Map[edit]

If you would have look under Talk:Orange County, California, you would have seen why your map was removed. Unless you post why you think its relevant expect it to get deleted again. --MarsRover 01:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:MarkMathabanePic.JPG[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:MarkMathabanePic.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:JohannesburgJSE.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:JohannesburgJSE.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fram0Historical.JPG listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fram0Historical.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —innotata 03:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nueva (typeface)[edit]

The article Nueva (typeface) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm not finding any sources discussing this font in any depth. Unfortunately Type Magazine doesn't have searchable archives and the Baseline Magazine website isn't loading for me, so I couldn't check those typography-specific publications, but on other sources (Google, JSTOR, Questia, DeepDyve) I found nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]