User talk:Dankafanchan

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Dankafanchan, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Bamyers99 (talk) 00:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kafanchan[edit]

Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.--Quisqualis (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shadalafiya[edit]

Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.--Quisqualis (talk) 05:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kafanchan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 21:34, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kafanchan, you may be blocked from editing. - Among other things, your edits broke the formatting of a reference. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Kaduna (April 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://books.openedition.org/ifra/761?lang=en. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Southern Kaduna may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dankafanchan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kafanchan edit warring[edit]

Your continued insistence on making the same inane edits, without citing sources, and ignoring requests that you support your edits, constitutes edit warring and a general failure to comprehend the purpose of Wikipedia and standard editing etiquette. I've requested that your account be blocked.

Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

preposterous[edit]

You must be out of your mind.. You keep writing wrong information of Kafanchan because of your selfish religion purpose.. Kafanchan is not under any emirate..he is only known as sarkin Hausawa... So please stay away from making wrong information on Kafanchan... And I've requested you be blocked from Wikipedia aldo Dankafanchan (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Posting a warning on your own talk page without any indication as to whom it is addressed to is of no value. If you wish to warn another editor then post either on his/her talk page, or if you believe that they are vandalizing then on WP:ANI. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:48, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Christianity in Nigeria. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:36, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Christianity in Nigeria, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Christianity in Nigeria. - Arjayay (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning[edit]

Your recent editing history at Christianity in Nigeria shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 16:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Christianity in Nigeria. - Arjayay (talk) 16:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Middle Belt. - Arjayay (talk) 16:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 12:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Middle Belt.

October 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nenadi Usman. - Arjayay (talk) 15:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kafanchan. - Arjayay (talk) 11:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kafanchan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 10:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly adding names with no evidence of notability[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:31, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kafanchan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
You have repeatedly been blocked for adding non-notable people - your first edit after your last block expired was to add another such person - Please STOP before you are permanently blocked - Arjayay (talk) 09:46, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Middle Belt. - Arjayay (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Kaduna State. - Arjayay (talk) 11:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Abuja. - Arjayay (talk) 12:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kaduna State, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]