User talk:DBD/Archive 33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2017 – July 2018

Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017 November 13#Diocese of Jerusalem[edit]

Could you please take a look at my alt suggestion? Mangoe (talk) 20:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DBD. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RC v Pre-Ref[edit]

Bash, mate! RE: Template:Roman Catholic Archbishops of Tuam — you should know better! The Pre-Reformation ordinaries mustn't be called RC (nor CoI/Anglican). DBD 21:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Got it[edit]

Redirected to Template:Pre-Reformation Archbishops of Tuam Bashereyre (talk) 08:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But I already deleted the Pre-Ref archbishops! Now you've got Post-Ref RCs in a template called Pre-Ref! DBD 09:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello DBD, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Happy Saturnalia![edit]

Happy Saturnalia
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free and you not often get distracted by dice-playing. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:51, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Years new page backlog drive[edit]

Hello DBD, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Minor updates[edit]

Please note that the definition of a minor edit is at Help:Minor edit. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ta. Turns out even old-timers can do with a periodic reminder. DBD 15:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello DBD, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
  • We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

  • We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
  • Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10[edit]

Hello DBD, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
See also

ACTRIAL:

  • ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

  • Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

  • While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

  • The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018[edit]

Hello DBD, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
See also

ACTRIAL:

  • WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

  • Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

  • A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

  • There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

  • Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

  • The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

  • Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
  • The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HRH Prince Harry of Wales listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH Prince Harry of Wales. Since you had some involvement with the HRH Prince Harry of Wales redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HRH Prince Henry of Wales listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH Prince Henry of Wales. Since you had some involvement with the HRH Prince Henry of Wales redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Harry of the United Kingdom listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prince Harry of the United Kingdom. Since you had some involvement with the Prince Harry of the United Kingdom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Henry of the United Kingdom listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prince Henry of the United Kingdom. Since you had some involvement with the Prince Henry of the United Kingdom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bill Stuart-White, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day[edit]

Happy First Edit Day, DBD', from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Kpgjhpjm (talk) 03:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kpgjhpjm (talk) 03:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]

Hello DBD, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ordination template[edit]

I've reverted your addition of the ordination template at Stephen Cottrell because it wasn't showing anything other than the location. Looking at John Taylor (bishop of Winchester), its a very "busy" template verses the Orders section that is already part of the Christian leader infobox. What benefits does the template have over the status quo? Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 15:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Detail, collapsibility, wikidata integration. See Template talk:Ordination for discussion on wikidata calling not working as intended right now. I was hoping that could be fixed swiftly and then your "wasn't showing anything" issue would be solved; but absolutely fine for it not to be there while it isn't working as intended. DBD 17:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Titles of nobility in British judiciary articles[edit]

After reverting your changes to President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom where you took names like "Lady Hale" and "Lord Neuberger" and turned them into "Brenda, Baroness Hale of Richmond" and "David, Baron Neuberger of Abbotsbury", I noticed that you have gone through almost all of the articles for the higher British judiciary and changed the names to this style. Not only is this not in keeping with standard practice for reference to peers,[1] it is also not in keeping with standard practice in referring to senior members of the judiciary in law reports,[2] and it is not in keeping with the precedent on Wikipedia, as every article universally referred to such figures as merely "Lady Hale" and "Lord Neuberger" before your edits (for instance, at Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales or List of Lords of Appeal in Ordinary). Indeed, I have never in my life seen any peer referred to as "X, Baron Y of Z" - even on the UK Parliamentary website, their full title is "Lord Y of Z".[3] In light of this, is there any chance you could you revert the pages in question to their proper form? CuriousCabbage (talk) 16:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/about-us/style-book/5277599/Titles-and-how-to-use-them.html
  2. ^ https://lrweb.beds.ac.uk/a-guide-to-referencing/cite-law-reports
  3. ^ For example: https://www.parliament.uk/biographies/lords/lord-heseltine/94

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018[edit]

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello DBD, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules
  • New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
  • Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
  • Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
Editathons
  • Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
The Signpost
  • The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DBD/Archive_33&oldid=1079157185"