User talk:Coosbane

Is it permissible under any circumstances to quote a single paragraph from a copyrighted book? It is short, with five sentences. Its use is contemplated because of its particular relevance to the topic. Thanks. --Coosbane (talk) 16:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not. Sorry! — neuro^(talk) 16:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. According to the rules, what is the required format for publisher's permission to use copyrighted material. Thanks. --Coosbane (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You would have to get them to release it under a GFDL-compatible license, and then send the proof to OTRS. — neuro^(talk) 17:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Style[edit]

You seem to be doing good work, but your style is a little informal - for instance, sentences like "Time for Plan B." and section titles like "Sic Transit Gloria Mundi". There's a manual of style if you're in the mood for some heavy reading, but it's better to read through other articles, especially those at "GA" and above in Category:Rail transport articles by quality.

A few other things:

You shouldn't blank your talk page; see Help:Archiving a talk page.
You state that File:RochesterAndPittsburgh1.jpg was "first published prior to January 1, 1923", but only give the date it was taken. Many images taken before 1923 are not usable because they were not published until later, if at all. See [1].
Are you sure that the Rochester and Pittsburgh Railroad built the Kinzua Viaduct? Everything I've seen, including our article, says the Erie did.

--NE2 20:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sic transit gloria mundi is an intentional literary device utilized to make the point that grand plans often ended up in ruins in the railroad industry. Is there a page which lists all Categories? Haven't been able to find one with everything. The notation that the R&P built the viaduct is an error. Thanks for pointing it out. It'll be corrected shortly. --Coosbane (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know what "sic transit gloria mundi" means (and it's not specific to the railroad industry), but it's a little too colloquial for Wikipedia. Generally the history would go into a "history" section, and that can be split if necessary. [2] lists all categories, but I don't know if you want that

--NE2 21:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As soon as the weather allows, I plan to canvass the local rail historical resources for a better collection of better-documented photographs. For what it's worth, my recent image selections have been more carefully made than the earlier ones were. --Coosbane (talk) 21:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but there's still a strong possibility that they are not free. It's certainly annoying, but that's life. --NE2 21:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm making fewer rash assumptions about that now. As for replacing Sic transit gloria mundi, how about a play on the word, "terminal"? --Coosbane (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about not making plays on words? Except in rare cases, like Conrail, the disposition of the property is not complicated enough to require a separate section anyway. --NE2 21:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The exception in this case (or these cases) is that, in almost all instances, the end of one railroad led to the appearance of another. The Terminal section deals with the details of this connection or relation. --Coosbane (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would fit nicely at the end of a history section. See, for instance, California Southern Railroad. --NE2 21:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will work the change in as I go through these articles. --Coosbane (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second thoughts on this. Since these are all railroads which disappeared long ago, their entire stories are history. Thus, there is no section per se as history, as the entire article consists of historical content. It seems to me that it makes more sense to retain the structure of dividing the history into the sections that I've used, including one clearly identified as how things ended for the railroad. This creates a consistent top-to-bottom/start-to-finish pattern that keeps the article from being merely a factoid list. Does this make sense, as you see it? --Coosbane (talk) 22:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Depending on how long the article is, you may only need one section for history. Sections are generally at least several paragraphs long. --NE2 22:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting an unneeded article[edit]

{{helpme}} The Rochester and Pittsburgh Railroad article has been folded into Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway and can be removed. What's the proper procedure for accomplishing this? Thanks. --Coosbane (talk) 12:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Easiest would be to turn it into a redirect, that way people looking for the old name will find the new article. Regards So Why 12:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:WilliamNoonan.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:WilliamNoonan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC) --Stifle (talk) 12:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That image was removed from its article some time ago. The image can be deleted at any time. --Coosbane (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sluggishness[edit]

{{helpme}} In light of the recent six million dollars received by WP, I find it peculiar that the WP system remains sluggish and unresponsive on many occasions. Did the money go into resources other than servers? --Coosbane (talk) 13:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you need help with anything in particular? --Closedmouth (talk) 13:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) It went into various things. This should answer your question. — neuro^(talk) 13:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wheatland Center, New York[edit]

I have nominated Wheatland Center, New York, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheatland Center, New York. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 00:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: that page also includes the AFD nominations for Belcoda, Beulah, New York, Garbutt, New York, Mumford, New York, and Scottsville, New York. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask, and to put in your opinions on the AFD page. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 01:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mallets kissing.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mallets kissing.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 23:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Mallets_kissing.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Mallets_kissing.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 00:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Connor2.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:American Railroad Journal.jpg[edit]

The file File:American Railroad Journal.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Henry Bicker Gibson.jpg[edit]

The file File:Henry Bicker Gibson.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mise-en-scene.jpg[edit]

The file File:Mise-en-scene.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused file. No encyclopedic usage since 2009.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Peter Sheffer II.jpg[edit]

The file File:Peter Sheffer II.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Wheatland Ag Society.jpg[edit]

The file File:Wheatland Ag Society.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dedication of Scottsville train station 1911.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dedication of Scottsville train station 1911.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 18:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scottsville passenger station.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scottsville passenger station.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 16:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Scottsville train station 1911.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:New Scottsville train station 1911.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 23:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]