User talk:Closed Limelike Curves

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Closed Limelike Curves, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Another friend on Wikipedia! Yay! Benjamin (talk) 06:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Bnuuy" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bnuuy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 1#Bnuuy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I noticed that in this edit to Elon Musk, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information you removed from the lead section is a summary of information that is fully sourced in the body of the article. See WP:LEAD. General Ization ^Talk 02:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I missed that.

When I took a look at the section on COVID-19 in the body of the article, I kinda got the feeling it needs some revision to meet WP:NPOV. But that talk page looks like such a shitshow that I just absolutely do not want to get involved. Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 03:10, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 8 § Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Mathematics of apportionment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uniformly. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mathematics of apportionment into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 02:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Highest averages method[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Highest averages method, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Moved to Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Help_me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have moved your request to WP:VPT as this sounds like a technical issue (and two of us have been chatting and cannot replicate your issue). Please follow that discussion for the hopeful resolution of your issue. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 12:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monotonicity criterion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social choice function.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Participation criterion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Runoff voting.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Closed Limelike Curves. Thank you for your work on Sincere vote. Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT and please do not create redirects to another redirect (known as a double redirect); instead, redirect to the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 00:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sequential loser method moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Sequential loser method. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FULBERT (talk) 20:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Plurality voting

added a link pointing to Runoff voting

Totum pro parte

added a link pointing to Ranked-choice voting

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Comparison of electoral systems

added a link pointing to Social choice function

Plurality voting

added a link pointing to Runoff voting

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Graduated majority judgment + Usual Judgement merge edit[edit]

Hey there, I noticed you completely overhauled the page I knew as Usual Judgement. I was looking at the edit history but see nothing but a big initial edit in January, so I assume you merged in the Usual Judgement page which unfortunately removed it's edit history. I am a bit confused about two sections there: first I don't see how the in the overview presented counting method (paragraph 2) is the same as in the rest of the article. Second I find the line-drawing approach insufficiently explained as to be an understandable and precise procedure. I would strongly encourage you to edit these sections again so that I can verify and proof that they correspond The tie breaking mechanism of usual judgement. I find what you wrote interesting because it suggests that decentralised paper vote counting may be efficient of UJ, which I did not realise yet. However I cannot quite link the Wikipedia page in the current state to people I want to read about UJ which I find very unfortunate Sirati97 (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find the history here. (Sorry about the copy-and-paste, I didn't know about moving pages back then!)

As far as precinct-summability goes, yes, you can tally up grades for candidates in each category. The complexity is O(G*K) for G grades and K candidates. (It's worse than score voting's O(K), but only by a constant factor.) This is a common property of any method that doesn't rely on comparing candidates (only comparing candidate scores).

I've made some edits to try and improve the description. Further improvements are welcome! Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 17:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demeny voting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equal representation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Burlington 2009 election[edit]

Template:Burlington 2009 election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DB1729^talk 20:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished edit[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1204706712

"In more recent years, ranked choice voting has been implemented in." ? — Omegatron (talk) 18:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proportionality for solid coalitions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equal representation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]