User talk:Clconway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good decision. I appreciate when editors can come to a compromise rather than just engaging in a senseless edit war that helps no one and isn't good for Wikipedia. Keep up the good work! --Wordbuilder 14:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Top Chef[edit]

Thanks! Wl219 03:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Top Chef (Season 4)[edit]

What would be, in your opinion, the best way to work in the fact that this is the first couple to ever compete against one another on Top Chef (or any Bravo reality show, from what we know)? I added something in the contestant introduction at top, but I'm tired and it appears awkward. I like that you moved Jennifer/Zoi to each other's individual lines, even if it's a tad redundant. Maybe it deserves it's own section?James D. (Cinemaniac86) 16:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism[edit]

I'd suggest looking at this revert closely - at first glance I thought it was vandalism, too. Turns out it isn't- it does follow the 10-foot user interface model, though it probably isn't something that needs to be in the lede. tedder (talk) 19:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Myth of the Flat Earth[edit]

I've reverted your recent edit, which you labeled as only concerned with style. From my observation, they removed some important factual and interpretative material, which contribute important elements to the discussion. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 22:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The only factual or interpretive material I removed was the Russell quote, ""... with extraordinary [sic] few exceptions no educated person in the history of Western Civilization from the third century B.C. onward believed that the earth was flat," but this quote is redundant. It essentially duplicates what Gould, Lindberg and Numbers say in the preceding paragraphs. I also removed the statement, "the first accounts of the [Columbus] legend have been traced to the 1830s," which is directly contradicted in the following sentence ("In 1828..."). Clconway (talk) 13:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User box, and move change discussion[edit]

This user has a website, which can be found here.

Your user box is linking to a broken page.
Also I went ahead started a move discussion on the Press-up article. Cya. --AerobicFox (talk) 06:44, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Clconway. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Clconway. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Clconway. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]