User talk:Ciao bill

Welcome!

Hello, Ciao bill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Mitchell Wilder, from its old location at User:Ciao bill/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 01:30, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitchell Wilder (December 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This biography is sketchy, skimming across what appears an eminent career, but giving few citations. Notability demands substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources (see WP:RS). The Early life section is mainly an extract from an obituary to his father - likened to the subject's own career (sounds like original research to me). I have toned down the promotional tone, removed the embedded external links, added in some relevant wikilinks, but this needs further work to expand end evidence the subject's career.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mitchell Wilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mitchell Wilder, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ciao bill! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paul W (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I understand the review and am confident that I have sufficient reliable sources in hand to continue work on the entry. Ciao bill (talk) 23:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitted yesterday! Ciao bill (talk) 02:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitchell Wilder (September 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Large portions of the submission are unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mitchell Wilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitchell Wilder (October 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Rachel Nellis, Archivist of the Cosmos Club, Washington, D.C. provided the following list of Wilder's honors [...] Provided them to which reliable source? ¶ Also, there seems to be an accretion of trivia. During his three years at Chouinard, Wilder was able to announce: / The accreditation of Chouinard by the Western Association of Colleges / The appointment of an academic dean / The implementation of a novel curriculum / [...] Is any new school worth the name not swiftly accredited? Does any new school not swiftly get an academic dean? "Novel" in what way(s)?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mitchell Wilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 07:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review, Hoary. Your comments helped me realize the need to clarify several elements: that Chouinard was not a "new" school, that it had been exclusively an art school, not an accredited degree granting college, and that changes anyone unfamiliar with the challenges of achieving or maintaining accreditation might consider "trivia."

Could you point out specific sources Wikipedia guidelines consider not "reliable"? In other museum curator or director entries, I see similar sources, newspapers, books, etc.

Thanks again. Ciao bill (talk) 16:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoary, could you provide some substantiation for this comment: "Is any new school worth the name not swiftly accredited? Does any new school not swiftly get an academic dean?" The Wikipedia entry on "Higher education accreditation in the United States" does not make it sound like something that happens "swiftly," and my experience supporting the re-accreditation of a top ranked medical school would make the answer to your question "Is any new school worth the name not swiftly accredited?" "No", even for well-established institutions, the accreditation process in time-consuming and fraught with critical reviews. Ciao bill (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitchell Wilder has been accepted[edit]

Mitchell Wilder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]