User talk:Chickitychina`1`1
FPC[edit]
I noticed that you left an unsigned post at Featured Picture candidates. Please sign all posts at WP:FPC. Thank you. J Are you green? 01:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Voting on FPCs[edit]
Please try to make constructive comments on Featured picture candidacies, even when you don't like the image. I am trying to assume good faith, but right now it really looks like you're trolling, and if you continue in the same vein, you will be blocked from editing. Mak (talk) 02:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Mak (talk) 03:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Chickitychina`1`1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wasn't properly warned and my edits weren't made in bad faith.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Do not abuse the unblock template. I have protected your page for the duration of your block. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Watch it[edit]
This is not the sort of phrasing that will help you avoid another, longer block. You really have been warned this time. --YFB ¿ 07:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- The articles aren't censored. We expect a certain level of civility in Featured Picture discussions; you've already been blocked for not meeting it. Take a look around FPC and see how often you see other editors using your style of voting. Not many? There's a reason for that. --YFB ¿ 07:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Moved from YFB's talk page - let's keep this discussion in one place, please.
- Okay, thanks for the warning. I will be civil from now on. I have a question though, does a vulva that has gone AWOL disqualify an image from attaining featured status? Because there is an image with a vulva that is MIA and that was used as a justification for two oppose votes. Chickitychina`1`1 07:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- That's a valid reason to oppose. If you look at the Featured Picture Criteria, you'll notice that criteria 6 (is accurate) and 10 (no significant digital manipulation of the subject) would technically disqualify this image from featured status, since obviously the removal of a significant anatomical feature constitutes a misleading lack of accuracy. On that basis, I'm inclined to speedy close the nomination. --YFB ¿ 08:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy close the picture of a beautiful butt? Wow. If you are going to do that, please take a look at the banana peel one. That one is a speedy close if I ever saw one. Chickitychina`1`1 08:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- I was already planning to - they're both gone now. I'm glad you've decided to accept our conduct standards. Please remember that you've caught the attention of a number of editors for the wrong reasons, so your edits will be watched carefully and a block will quickly follow the first sign of troll-like behaviour. Cheers, --YFB ¿ 08:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Copied from YFB's talk page
- May I recommend a tastefully comedic video to you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmyMHJMokoM
- I was already planning to - they're both gone now. I'm glad you've decided to accept our conduct standards. Please remember that you've caught the attention of a number of editors for the wrong reasons, so your edits will be watched carefully and a block will quickly follow the first sign of troll-like behaviour. Cheers, --YFB ¿ 08:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy close the picture of a beautiful butt? Wow. If you are going to do that, please take a look at the banana peel one. That one is a speedy close if I ever saw one. Chickitychina`1`1 08:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- That's a valid reason to oppose. If you look at the Featured Picture Criteria, you'll notice that criteria 6 (is accurate) and 10 (no significant digital manipulation of the subject) would technically disqualify this image from featured status, since obviously the removal of a significant anatomical feature constitutes a misleading lack of accuracy. On that basis, I'm inclined to speedy close the nomination. --YFB ¿ 08:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for the warning. I will be civil from now on. I have a question though, does a vulva that has gone AWOL disqualify an image from attaining featured status? Because there is an image with a vulva that is MIA and that was used as a justification for two oppose votes. Chickitychina`1`1 07:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Peace. Chickitychina`1`1 08:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)