User talk:ChickSR

Copyright problem on Judaism and masturbation[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Judaism and masturbation, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Putin in Schoeps article[edit]

Hello. You've recently added a news photo of Putin using Schoeps microphones to the "Schoeps" articles in English and German. In the English-language version, the photo that you added is the only one in the article. This has the very painful effect, when one sees it, of implying guilt by association for the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Maybe you intended that effect and maybe you didn't--I could understand it either way. Any and all protests against the invasion are justified in my opinion. But Schoeps has no control over who uses their products--and like many other companies around the world, the company has suspended all business in or with Russia in response to the invasion. So this association is really not warranted, and in this case actually misleading.

On a less emotional level, the choice of that photo also creates another false impression: that speech transmission is the most characteristic application for Schoeps microphones. (In the German article, the only other photo is one from the German parliament.) While microphones for film and video sound, broadcasting, conferences and public address systems have always been an important secondary market for Schoeps, the most representative photo would probably be the Three Tenors or Pavarotti using Colette microphones with RC extension tubes and B 5 D pop screens, or any of the many orchestras that use Schoeps microphones for broadcasting, streaming and recording.

Also, just as a technical point I don't think that the microphones in the photo are actually from Schoeps' Colette series as you say. I think they are CCMs (a series not covered in the article), which use the transducers of the Colette series but are non-modular as far as capsules and amplifiers are concerned.

I would really ask you to reconsider your editing choice and possibly to revert it. Other, more representative and less "charged" photos can surely be found. I promise to spend some time looking for something more suitable in the near future.

Best regards, DSatz (talk) 19:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the technical information. Feel free to add more photos illustrating other fields of use. ChickSR (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Social entropy[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Social entropy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds (German magazine) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Sounds (German magazine). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mattdaviesfsic, thanks for the notice. I have added sources to establish notability. Is that enough? I would not like to write more than a stub, since the article had to be created due to a disambiguation problem, related to my moving of the page Sounds (UK magazine). ChickSR (talk) 11:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks alright, thanks. I don't like stubs personally (not that I have a hatred of them - I just like an article to be comprehensive!) but that should be fine. About me, talk to me; to notify me, type [[User|Mattdaviesfsic]]. Thanks! 13:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like stubs either. But since I don't have the time and interest in the subject and there is already an extensive German-language article, this was the only thing I could quickly do to solve the issue. ChickSR (talk) 14:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattdaviesfsic, can it be removed from the draftspace now? Thanks for helping out. ChickSR (talk) 10:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sounds (German magazine) (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sounds (German magazine) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChickSR! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]