User talk:ChaseKiwi

Welcome!

Hello, ChaseKiwi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Will (Talk - contribs) 00:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were welcomed because your talk page was a red link. I have a script from George Money called Auto-Welcome. It adds a [welcome] link to every red-linked user talk page. It does not help me check your contribs. So never have your talk page deleted and you should never be confused with a new user.

BTW: George also has a great way to auto-archive your talk page. It is his Auto-Archive tool. Not as good as User:Werdnabot, but you don't need a bot.

Will (Talk - contribs) 04:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't look like a vandal. Please provide an edit summary when you edit.[edit]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Will (Talk - contribs) 00:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would have provided a link to the problem page, but the template I used, {{summary}}, doesn't provide a parameter for that. I am working on getting that template changed to allow that.

However, in the meantime, if you want to know which edit it was I saw, I suggest you check your contribs page. (That link is also up top next to My Watchlist.) Will (Talk - contribs) 04:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ganfyd for deletion[edit]

The article Ganfyd is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganfyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Burhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 10:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note, this should be linked to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganfyd (2nd_nomination) instead. —Soap— 12:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wellesley House School[edit]

Hi, ChaseKiwi!

If you're interested in creating the article Wellesley House School, please feel free to create it! The deleted page you refer to had absolutely no information in it - all it said was "A private preparatory school in Broadstairs, Kent."

I would, however, recommend you take a look at WP:INHERIT, which basically says that Notability is not "inherited" - just because a few notable people went to the school doesn't mean that the school is notable by itself.

That being said, I have nothing against you creating an article for the school :) Happy Editing! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:34, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption and tsunami has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 14:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

South Kermadec Ridge Seamounts moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, South Kermadec Ridge Seamounts, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 13:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Kermadec Ridge Seamounts has been accepted[edit]

South Kermadec Ridge Seamounts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi

Thank you for creating Paeroa Fault.

User:Femke, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Femke}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Femke (talk) 15:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Obturaculum[edit]

The article Obturaculum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest you wait as all articles need time if written by humans to be referenced and expanded. I suspect you are bot mad This resulted from incidental discovery that anatomical features of a class of organism which has over 15,000 different species was poorly described by wikipedia. My comparative anatomy studies were 40 years ago and it takes time to hunt up references when improving another article that had nothing to do with tube worms that used the obscure Japanese name for one. ChaseKiwi (talk) 23:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. Thank you for creating Yamakuni River. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Nagasakibana moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Cape Nagasakibana, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are right even if there are multiple articles on geographical features that have no references that I am aware of and are noted as class 5 articles, but have for the reason that geography context is important in a encyclopaedia been left for years as the facts are actually very easy to verify for travellers. The correct reason for asking for a rewrite is found on the Japanese Wikipedia.ChaseKiwi (talk) 07:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cape Nagasakibana (October 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MB was:

Does not meet MOS:DAB. There can be no blue links in the description, no coords, no references. Consider whether this should be fixed to comply or possibly converted to a WP:SIA

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cape Nagasakibana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MB 14:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I think it should be a WP:SIA as it can't easily be fixed to comply given that even the Japananese have managed to create only 4 articles on their relevant disambiguation page in the Japanese wikipedia. ChaseKiwi (talk) 20:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChaseKiwi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MB 14:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Taupō Volcanic Zone/Map data[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Taupō Volcanic Zone/Map data requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 08:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This certainly should be deleted as a transient misunderstanding of how to tidy up page from inline map data and sandbox development with the brief former content now housed correctly on an allowed data page Wikipedia:Map data/Taupō Volcanic Zone. ChaseKiwi (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Seamounts of New Zealand[edit]

Hi. There has been a suggestion and discussion in response to your comments at Category talk:Seamounts of New Zealand. Do you have any thoughts to add on the suggestion? Nurg (talk) 06:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. Thank you for your work on Auckland regional faults. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. Thank you for your work on Mount Titiraupenga. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:59, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. Thank you for your work on Mount Pureora. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:00, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. Thank you for your work on Alexandra Volcanic Group. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:33, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. Thank you for your work on Whangārei volcanic field. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more articles!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia[edit]

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Zealandia. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick (Talk) 12:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting and now fully compliant with retrospective apology for detail that missed due to corrected ignorance ChaseKiwi (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Magellan Seamounts is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 14:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It hopefully is even better now as it needed a bit of work on disambiguation and the academic reference that got me interested in improving this section in first place. ChaseKiwi (talk) 08:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cape Nagasakibana[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cape Nagasakibana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably worth saving since disambiguation could be useful to others who can not read Japanese, so will have another look ChaseKiwi (talk) 08:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Magellan Seamounts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magellan Rise.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deliberate ChaseKiwi (talk) 08:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Puhipuhi Embayment is another excellent article. Great work! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cape Nagasakibana has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cape Nagasakibana. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vega 1 deprecation - Impacted chart notice[edit]

Hey @ChaseKiwi. I'm working with a few community members to deprecate an old version of Vega.js that is used to power the Graph extension. I wanted to note that later this year, when we deprecate version 1 of Vega, the charts in this sandbox and associated talk page will be break. Work related to this change is discussed on phab:T260542#8737244 Seddon (WMF) (talk) 23:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Upper Waikato Stream Fault is yet another excellent article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. You have new messages at Talk:Arago hotspot.
Message added 09:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update since I replied. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wishbone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wishbone Ridge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cape Nagasakibana (July 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia can not be used as reference sources. Use significant coverage from reliable and independent sources instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cape Nagasakibana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GAN of 1886 eruption of Mount Tarawera[edit]

Kia ora ChaseKiwi - just thought I'd stop by to give you a heads up that I've nominated the above article for Good Article status and it's in the process of getting reviewed. I'm happy to work on most of the feedback as it comes in, but given you've shown interest in a lot of volcanic articles (including that one) I thought you might like to keep half an eye on it in case anything super technical comes up? I also can't seem to find a source to back up the comparison to Mount Saint Helens that I evidently added at some point, do you have any idea where might back that up? Turnagra (talk) 10:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See your talk page for perhaps a way to handle what is an accurate comparison but the source is likely 33 years ago and so pre-internet and google indexing. Have walked Mt Tarawera when it was allowed, Mount Saint Helens yet to have my feet for eye ball comparison but this may happen. Cheers and hope you are successful. ChaseKiwi (talk) 22:29, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tarawera Falls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kolk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. Thank you for your work on Ruby Seamount. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating and expanding the article on Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Rotomahana Basin: your recent posts[edit]

Dear ChaseKiwi, a private note to recognise your diligence in revising and correcting the sorely dated pages for Lakes Rotomahana and Rotomakariri, (not forgetting Rangarua tapu) and the Pink and White Terraces. These pages were five years out of date, with perhaps fourteen of my published research papers alone, overlooked or ignored by other editors. Because of my prolific research publishing, I'm unable any longer to edit on Wiki, lest I be accused of self-promotion ... a Catch-22 Wiki has never resolved. Our decade-long research in the Basin draws to the end with the fifth and sixth research papers for 2023 publishing this month, and the seventh and final 2023 paper in press.

I applaud your recent effort on altimetry. Long ago we recognised this was the overlooked key to the Terraces. Last year, I finally published the evidence and I think this may have escaped your formidable focus. Finally, I see we share a medical background and as geology was originally a branch of medicine your active editing is historically appropriate. Regards, Rex Counterrev11 (talk) 06:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your supportive comments. Can I thank you and colleagues without whose diligent research, not hidden behind pay walls, improvement would not have been much more difficult and escape what focus I have. I also thank you for bringing your recent publications to my attention. ChaseKiwi (talk) 23:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, ChaseKiwi. Thank you for your work on Lau-Colville Ridge. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cape Nagasakibana (November 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please cite more sources. Also, try revising biologically significant marine area as it is a Loggerhead sea turtle feeding ground at the southern limit in Japan of eel grass ecology. to something else as it reads promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cape Nagasakibana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cape Nagasakibana has been accepted[edit]

Cape Nagasakibana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted[edit]

Hi ChaseKiwi, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede 66 14:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ta thanks. Sure that much of my work could do with improvement by those more experienced but will try to keep added content to fair standard.ChaseKiwi (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Volcanic events in Iceland[edit]

Hello Chase, Many thanks for your latest chat. I think that I have willingly addressed every point, because I was less than satisfied by the state of the article. Also, I am sorry about what is about to happen to you ... Whilst I was clearing my throat to ask for technical help, you stood up and proffered technical skills beyond my wildest dreams, (mark=Red Arrow Up.svg). Where can I find a list of other graphics? But my real need/craving is to optimise . To wit: How can I put new anchors within the list of images and then navigate to them from the text-index.

i.e. ===Askja===

- Askja; An active volcano in the central highlands. A complex of nested calderas within .... ..... the shield volcanoes .... .... and Svartadyngja.

See index of eruption images on the right: [[#Anchor ??????????

I cannot associate anchor to images, I cannot navigate to them.

Apologies for asking but 'trial and error' cannot solve this challenge.

Many regards - Peter Chienlit (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC) Chienlit (talk) 20:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]