User talk:Chapman B. Cox

Chapman B. Cox, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Chapman B. Cox! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Chapman B. Cox. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Chapman B. Cox, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Chapman B. Cox! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Replace Bio, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Not an article draft. Responding separately on user's talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Chapman B. Cox/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:48, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you can create a new article either by going to Wikipedia:Articles for creation, or by doing it in your sandbox (and for that, you can just reuse the sandbox you submitted for review just now; simply blank the contents first). Either way, the draft will then com to the AfC team for review before being published. Hope this helps, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I meant to say also that if you are creating an article on yourself, you should know that autobiographies are very strongly advised against, please see WP:AUTOBIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Chapman B. Cox/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Chapman B. Cox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Chapman B. Cox/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Chapman B. Cox/sandbox[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Chapman B. Cox/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]