User talk:Cavaliers2016

September 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at FoxBox (sports). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Argles Barkley (talk) 22:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Score bug. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 13:38, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Score bug. [[User:Felida97|<b page. You are also welcome to add our userbox template

This user is a participant in WikiProject Women in Red (redlinks→blue)

style="color:black">Felida⁹⁷]] (talk) 13:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it i will stop it Cavaliers2016 (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry[edit]

The disrespectful edits was not me it was a hacker and I’m not responsible for this Cavaliers2016 (talk) 14:36, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK then; we believe you. Which means that per standard networking security protocols, we must block your account indefinitely. Sorry about that. Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cavaliers2016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here Me, as a blocked editor, are responsible for convincing administrators: that your conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and you are unintentionally blocked as a result because you use the same ip address

Decline reason:

We do not unblock compromised accounts. See WP:COMPROMISED for more information. 331dot (talk) 14:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.