User talk:Catherinejarvis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hhjnj — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.249.185.14 (talk) 01:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Catherinejarvis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ALI nom nom 17:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For your first article, this looks great. Nice work! ALI nom nom 17:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re [1] this edit, can you check this edit. I think your removal came from a poorly worded phrase from me, which I have tried to correct. Ceoil (talk) 21:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buchanan and King[edit]

I agree with you in terms of how the Buchanan-King relationship has been described in modern times, despite the scarcity of evidence. I just updated the relevant passage on the William R. King page and fixed one of the footnote references. Please take a look at it and let me know what you think. If we have the right tone and facts captured, that's good. If not, please let me know. Billmckern (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The Original Barnstar
{{{1}}}

You receive the barnstar for your work in insisting on precision in articles, and upholding the true mission of WikipediaOnonuofk (talk) 21:43, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

"Wikipedia articles are not carved in stone; they are not even copyrighted." Yes they are. Please read WP:COPYRIGHT and amend your user page. HelenOnline 17:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Katharine Hepburn[edit]

Hi, in case you don't see it I just wanted to let you know I've replied to your comment at Talk:Katharine Hepburn. Cheers, --Loeba (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Madonna[edit]

Yes, I agree also. Would you like to participate in an informal review of the article? Myself and two other editors are trying to weed out the fancruft through an informal review on the article talk page and your contributions would be welcome! —JennKR | 00:46, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Max Baucus Name Change[edit]

Catherine,

While I appreciate your no-nonsense or "gossip" deletionist principles on articles, you deleted a talk point that I had made. The reason I put it into the talk, rather than the article, was to create a discussion and maybe prompt people to search for sources. A seemingly toxic comment, out of context, it was not entirely false. Source: He's my cousin, although I have no vested interest since I am not, nor ever was, an heir to Stephen Enke's estate. That source, in and of itself, also does not follow article guidelines, but since I did not include it in the article it should not be deleted. There is an interesting story here, and seems to have been eradicated from record. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.198.202.26 (talk) 14:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Grace Kelly[edit]

Hi,

We are Cornell University students working on a class project that involves the editing of Wikipedia pages. We are all very new to the Wikipedia editing process, and as such we were hoping for some feedback from some more experienced editors on our edits to the Grace Kelly article. We were wondering if you could assist us by verifying our sources, which we posted [[2]] on the article's talk page. We were also hoping to make some minor changes to the structure of the article and were hoping for some input on that as well. Our plan for the new structure is as follows:

PERSONAL LIFE

Family
Marriage
Wedding
Later Years
Death

Career

Movies
Awards
Fashion
Modeling

Legacy

Style
Links to the Community
Historical Sites
Philanthropy

Our group members have the following user pages:

- dcl248

- Kategruenberg

- Mfrosselot

- CeciliaIachetta

In this link you can find our Wikipedia class page and the description of our assignment: Cornell University Online Communities (Fall 2014)

We hope to hear back from you soon! Kategruenberg (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Catherinejarvis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Catherinejarvis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Catherinejarvis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]