User talk:Carflo213

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Carflo213! Thank you for your contributions. I am WereSpielChequers and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Ϣere SpielChequers 11:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MidNite DLite[edit]

The article MidNite DLite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY, possible hoax; this google search gets no hits.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rohit Gupta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 04:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saniya Anklesaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Max. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Carflo213. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rohit Gupta, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations.
I post this because the overwhelming majority of your edits (going back to 2013) are related to Gupta. See also WP:Single purpose account. (WP:SPA) 220 of ^Borg 19:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any connection to Ryder212 (talk · contribs) or Aterrence (talk · contribs), who also are mostly making edits related to Rohit Gupta? 220 of ^Borg 19:42, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Rohit Gupta, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 19:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Carflo213. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Carflo213. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block on Commons[edit]

@EugeneZelenko:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carflo213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I understand the mistakes I did and ensure it will not happen again. I respect wikipedia and it's administrators time and effort for everything you all do to maintain its integrity for the readers. I have never had the intention to do otherwise but only learn and enhance what you create. I clearly made mistakes in selecting the correct licence due to my inexperience and also respectfully appreciate your kind assistance in articulating what should and shouldn't be done. In the past I couldn't understand the process well therefore I sincerely request to help me learn and grow in an attempt to be a better wikipedian. I sincerely thank you in advance for your kind assistance and once again humbly request to assist. I would hope you will consider that anyone willing to correct their mistakes should be given a chance to improve.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only; this account is not blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 10:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You was blocked on Commons by commons:User:Elcobbola because of Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko:, Hello there, I did read up to get informed and educate us about sockpuppetry [which I had no idea about) and clearly as you pointed out we made a mistake. I realize that if using the same computer we need to inform at wikipedia. The other account is used by my cousin who uses my laptop for his work related as he relies on me for economic support. Please know, every action has been only in line with wikipedia guidelines without any malicious intent by any stretch of imagination in terms of editing articles etc. In case of any errors, if any, please know it was truly unintentional and mainly because of learning in progress. I therefore humbly request you to kindly uunblock the account thus helping us to become better wikipedians. I thank you in advance and applaud the time and effort you put in to ensure wikipedia's integrity is maintained. Rest assured we shall continue to do the same which you will notice along this journey. Thank you. Carflo213 (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This account is still not blocked. If you are talking about Wikimedia Commons, that's a separate project and you'll need to ask there. Note that WP:MEAT will likely apply. --Yamla (talk) 15:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Thank you so much for the guidance. Really appreciate it. Will reach out there. Carflo213 (talk) 18:42, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rohit Gupta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telecom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eng?[edit]

Re: this, what professional journals abbreviate English as "Eng"? This is not appropriate for inclusion in encyclopedic content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:40, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT COPY[edit]

"DO NOT COPY" is a basic concept in academia. The plot summary you included when you created Survive or Die here was copied from somewhere, for instance I see the summary in this Google cached page prior to your creation of that article. This is unacceptable. Copying is intellectually dishonest and lazy, and constitutes intellectual theft. Plagiarism and copyright violations will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:27, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright investigation request filed[edit]

Hello, Carflo213. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 19:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]