User talk:Camoka4

Welcome!

Hello, Camoka4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Beeblebrox (talk) 16:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page messages[edit]

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

File copyright problem with File:Bolutuneliacilis.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Bolutuneliacilis.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 12:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mehmet Haberal[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mehmet Haberal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ozellestirme logo.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ozellestirme logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:17, 10 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Bolutuneli.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Bolutuneli.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:49, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 22:49, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mehmet Haberal[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mehmet Haberal. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehmet Haberal. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Haber24.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haber24.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:34, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ergenekonkapak.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ergenekonkapak.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Erdogandemocracydebate.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Erdogandemocracydebate.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dogan holding logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dogan holding logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Phyllo[edit]

I think maybe both editors should take a break and let others weigh in. camoka you really don't help your case at all when you suggest that another editor is working in bad faith, and A Macedonian, I think the edit is a good faith edit so it doesn't do to call camoka a vandal.Wikipelli Talk 5:23 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Edit war[edit]

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Phyllo. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Phyllo. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 00:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Orphaned non-free image File:Ford otosan.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ford otosan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Interior karsan.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Interior karsan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karsan exterior.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karsan exterior.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karsan.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karsan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ford cab.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ford cab.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File on Turkish visa free[edit]

Your addition seems to have been contested now twice. Please discuss at File talk:TurkishVisaFreeTravel.png and obtain consensus before adding it again. It might be just a simple thing, but from the edit summaries I don't see what you are doing (something with russia+something with the "blue countries" or more?... L.tak (talk) 21:05, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is good to here; but could you explain that a bit? Does Ozguroot agree (I didn't see any discussion there). Please also note that you are at WP:3RR now, so (even if you think it is resolved), it might be better to leave any more reversion until the consensus is confirmed... L.tak (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rasim Ozan Kütahyalı requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. » nafSadh did say 18:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Karsan NYC.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Karsan NYC.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Istanbul-2020.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Istanbul-2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Istanbul-2020.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Istanbul-2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Map[edit]

Hi Camoka4 and thank you for your map File:Europe-Mapv2.gif. It is very useful. However, I notice that Switzerland is spelt with a Z instead of S; please could you upload an updated version? Thank you once again. - Cloudz 679 08:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thank you very much! - Cloudz 679 13:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europe-Mapv2.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Europe-Mapv2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Blue-Haired Lawyer ^t 21:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bolivia and Republic of Congo[edit]

In the map of web browser, Bolivia is blue, and the Republic of Congo is orange (not to confuse with Republic democratic of Congo) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.234.137.109 (talk) 21:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

map[edit]

please stop posting the map on other pages. Just keep yours on the page it was. --Ty Rezac (talk) 16:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Usage share of web browsers. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sudo Ghost 16:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upload of copyrighted images[edit]

Hi, please note that images like File:Ahmed-shafik.jpg and File:MohammadMorsy.jpg cannot be used on Wikipedia because they constitute copyright violations. Please check out Wikipedia:Image use policy for detailed information. Regards Hekerui (talk) 19:34, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monaco, San Marino, Vatican[edit]

Why these sovereign countries has been delete from the map of browsers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.239.229.128 (talk) 19:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bold Revert Discuss-cycle[edit]

He Camoka4, Thanks for letting me know you reverted my revert (and yes: I rereverted as the discussion is ongoing and you have no consensus for change). Please read up to the bold revert discuss cycle| to see why I did it and please don't call it vandalism. It is a very specific term in wikipedia terms (see WP:vandalism). Which doesn't mean I think you didn't bring up valid points. Probably the term "future member" will be changed to something more apt because of what you started! L.tak (talk) 21:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(and just a small reminder that you made some edits this afternoon and just 10 minutes ago as an IP (User talk:88.242.153.250 ‎)). That can be confusing for the discussion as it is not clear then if it is 1 or 2 users....L.tak (talk) 22:06, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012[edit]

Your recent editing history at Schengen Area shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. TDL (talk) 22:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Schengen Area, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Sudo Ghost 22:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Camoka4. You have new messages at SudoGhost's talk page.
Message added 23:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sudo Ghost 23:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Schengen Area[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TDL (talk) 23:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 00:13, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Schengen Area. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sudo Ghost 23:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Personal attacks[edit]

Well it appears above that you've already been blocked once for your insistence on the Schengen Area , but let me be absolutely clear: Just because multiple users disagree with you does not make this a grand conspiracy like you suggest at Talk:Schengen Area. But more importantly, if I see more personal attacks from you like you did today on L.tak's page, I will not hesitate to seek a further block. That's not acceptable and while L.tak may be more generous in putting up with it, I won't be so generous. Fry1989 ^eh? 21:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed: this is your last and final warning on the matter. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Camoka4 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sudo Ghost 00:36, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for logging out to violate the three revert rule (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Camoka4). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 21:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The two weeks have been restarted, as you appear to have attempted to evade the block. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:57, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Camoka4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I asked my ban to be lifted, they put another extra 2 weeks ban. I dunno why.??

Decline reason:

Because you evaded your block. Max Semenik (talk) 14:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Camoka4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can you show me an example where I evaded my block? I didn't evade any block. Camoka4 (talk) 15:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While it's true that you did not technically evade your block, you definitely tried to. I ran a check on your account to verify if you had really done so and saw that today you logged out and asked that an admin lift the autoblock which was automatically imposed on the IP you last used to edit. I cannot indicate which IP it was due to Wikipedia's privacy policy, but I'm sure you know what address I'm referring to. I'm sorry, but, since I consider this block extension reasonable, I shall not reverse it. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 17:55, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Camoka4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Sir/Madame, I apologize for everything. I think I was punished for a long and enough time already, and the ban will still continue for almost 2 weeks more. (because of a misunderstanding). I want to be free to edit with my account again. Thank you for understanding. Thank you. Camoka4 (talk) 14:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There was no misunderstanding, you tried to evade the block and it was therefore reset to begin anew. Unless and until you are ready to take responsibility for your own actions I can see no reson to lift this block prematurely I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

sock puppeting after the block extension?[edit]

Your name has been mentioned again in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Camoka4 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before commenting. You may comment on this page regarding the charge (as you can not comment on the SPI page due to your block). L.tak (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Camoka4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK. I have been using sockpuppets. I ACCEPT MY MISTAKES. AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. Please see my useful contributions in commons because commons account was not banned during that time. I want to make useful contributions, not fight with anyone, and not use any sockpuppets either. I promise. I accept all my mistakes. and I apologize again.Camoka4 (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have just blocked a sock account you were using to edit, Ali.carik (talk · contribs), after you promised you would create a new account and edit using a new IP address. As such, I cannot accept your unblock request. If you really want to edit Wikipedia again, you should follow WP:OFFER. Do not employ socks for six months and then ask again. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Camoka4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK. The story is I was banned for a month. Then I logged in as IP and asked my ban to be lifted. I didn't know it was forbidden to ask a ban lifted from another IP. I was banned for this. Then I started using sockpuppets Ali.carik etc. to edit articles, because the block was indefinite) It has become a vicious cycle. It all started when I asked my ban lifted which was written from an IP. I apologize for everything. Please give me a fresh start, I will follow the rules.I have a long history of useful edits like this this map I apologize for the sockpuppets I promise again and again not to use sockpuppets and follow the rules. Please give me a fresh start thanks... :1) I understand why I was blocked for. ::2) I won't repeat them again. :::3) I will make useful contributions. ::::4) Please give me a fresh start for this. Camoka4 (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Socking, and still more socking. You are not getting unblocked today or anytime soon, and your repeatitive unblock requests call for me to remove your access to this page, given you are also engaging in antagonistic reverting of others here. Courcelles 01:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Ford transit taxi nyc 03032011 1.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ford transit taxi nyc 03032011 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nissan cab.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nissan cab.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dogan holding logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dogan holding logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]