User talk:Camillaworld

1

Image copyright problem with Image:Robertoago.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Robertoago.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Robertoago.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:Robertoago.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Robertoago.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Q ^{T C} 02:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:200px-JohnRawls.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:200px-JohnRawls.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 01:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also Image:Robertoago2.jpg needs a source. Your other uploads (Image:Si cover 2008small.jpg, Image:Nairobi3Mait.gif, Image:Maitreyahand2.jpg, Image:Artofliving.jpg, Image:BC2.jpg) need evidence for their licenses - the front page of http://shareintl.org/ says "All rights reserved", not "public domain" or a free license. --dave pape (talk) 01:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and information about Benjamin Creme[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Camillaworld, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Regarding your comment at talk:Benjamin_Creme, information that you received personally from Creme himself is insufficient for inclusion in the article. You may however suggest it at the talk page and may be others will find a reliable third party source (e.g. newspaper article) for the information that you received from him personally. And then it can be included in the article. Andries (talk) 18:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Independence Wealth Management[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Independence Wealth Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Independence Wealth Management, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. E. Fokker (talk) 21:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Independence Wealth Management. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. E. Fokker (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Independence Wealth Management. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. E. Fokker (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Independence Wealth Management, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. E. Fokker (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Iwmlogo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Iwmlogo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Independence Wealth Management[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you have run into some troubles with your article Independence Wealth Management that suggest you may not understand why it keeps being proposed for deletion. There two main reasons:

(1) Notability - All articles on Wikipedia must meet our notability guidelines. To pass our notability guidelines, a topic must have significant coverage in reliable independent sources. The most common examples of this are independent news stories (going beyond merely repeating a press release), or coverage in published books. Not all topics pass our guidelines - in fact, most don't. It may be that Independence Wealth Management may simply not be notable. Please note that while many large, successful or innovative companies are notable, being large or successful or innovative does not make you notable. A company can be large or successful without a great many people ever having heard of it. The reason successful companies are often notable is that their success attracts independent news outlets to write stories about them. If this has not happened then the company may not be notable.
(2) Promotional style - Most digitally-savvy companies want to have an article on Wikipedia, because it helps clients find them. Many task employees or marketers with making articles for them. Generally, Wikipedia prefers articles to be written by people who are independent - i.e., are not paid by or related to the subject of the article. However, there is nothing inherently wrong with someone writing an article for money so long as they are able to prove the topic is notable and write the article in a WP:NPOV neutral, non-promotional style, referring to criticism and praise of the company in proportion to their representation in reliable sources. However, where an article appears promotional (ie. reads like an advertisement or brochure, or contains text similar to that which might appear on the company's official website) it will often be proposed for deletion, because Wikipedia is not in the business of providing free advertising or promotion. The effect of us not enforcing this policy would be that Wikipedia would be drowned in articles about individual products, start-up companies, wealth creation scams, and investment ventures, making it hard to find information on genuinely encyclopaedically notable topics and causing users to reject Wikipedia as a source of generally accurate and useful information.

The effect of all this is that, despite your best intentions, it may be that there is simply no place for your article on Wikipedia. Don't despair! If you are genuinely interested in improving Wikipedia there are many other articles that need your help! Get to work on improving them! - 05:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thai Childrens Trust Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thai Childrens Trust Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NEF The Innovation Institute logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NEF The Innovation Institute logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Independence Wealth Management[edit]

The article Independence Wealth Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

'Delete' WP:BEFORE reveals nothing that reaches the requirements of WP:CORPDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]